Fewer than 270,000 people voted at the Swaziland national
election in 2013: only 44 percent of those entitled to do so.
The percentage turnout was lower than in the previous
election in 2008.
The low turnout casts doubts on claims by King Mswati
III, sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch, that his subjects support what
he calls his kingdom’s ‘unique democracy’.
Political parties are not allowed to take part in
elections and most of the political groupings in Swaziland that advocate for
democracy have been banned under the King’s Suppression of Terrorism Act.
The Swazi people are only allowed to select 55 of the 65
members of the House of Assembly, the other 10 are appointed by the King. None
of the 30 members of the Swaziland Senate are elected by the people: the King
appoints 20 members and the other 10 are appointed by the House of Assembly.
Neither the House of Assembly nor the Senate are
independent of King, who can, and does, overrule
decisions he does not like.
The people do not elect the government; the Prime
Minister and Cabinet ministers are handpicked
by the King.
Immediately before the national election in September
2013, King Mswati announced that the political system in Swaziland that had until
then been called tinkhundla would in future be known as ‘Monarchical
Democracy.’ He said this would be a partnership between himself and the
people.
The supporters of King Mswati saw the election as a way
for the Swazi people to endorse the King’s version of democracy. At the same
time prodemocracy groups urged people to boycott the election.
The full results of the election have not been made
public by King Mswati. This is not unusual in Swaziland where ordinary people
are starved of information about the Royal Family and how the government is
run.
Information about the turnout in September’s election
slipped out in a report from the African Development Bank. In its Southern
Africa Quarterly Review and Analysis for the fourth quarter of 2013, the Bank
devotes a mere seven lines to the election but manages to reveal, ‘Swaziland
held its parliamentary elections in September 2013 and the voter turnout was 65
percent.’
If that was the case it means that about 267,000 of the
411,000 people who registered to vote actually did so. It also means that only
44.5 percent of the 600,000 people Swaziland’s Elections and Boundaries
Commission (EBC) said
were entitled to vote did so.
This compares to the 47.4 percent of people entitled to
vote in the previous election
in 2008 who actually did so. At that election 189,559 people of the 400,000
entitled to vote did so.
The vote for the 2013 election contradicts King Mswati,
who in a speech at
the opening of parliament in February said, ‘We wish to thank the nation
for going out in their numbers to elect a new government in a highly successful
election.’
It also exposes the Weekend
Observer newspaper, which is in effect owned by the King and is considered
to be a propaganda operation for the monarchy. Immediately after the vote
in September it reported
the turnout of people on election day was ‘about 400,000’ which would have
equated to a turnout by voters of about 97 percent.
It is impossible to tell whether the low turnout in the
2013 election was in support of the boycott call by prodemocracy advocates. It
could easily have been because ordinary Swazi people saw no point in voting as
it would change nothing in their lives.
The power wielded by King Mswati was criticised by two
independent international groups which observed the Swazi election in 2013.
Both the African
Union and the Commonwealth Observer Mission suggested the kingdom’s
constitution should be reviewed to allow political parties to contest
elections.
The Commonwealth
Observer Mission added that, ‘The presence of the monarch in the structure
of everyday political life inevitably associates the institution of the
monarchy with politics, a situation that runs counter to the development that
the re-establishment of the Parliament and the devolution of executive
authority into the hands of elected officials.’
Whatever the reason for the low turnout in the 2013 election,
King Mswati and his supporters can no longer claim with justification that the
Swazi people wholeheartedly support the political system in Swaziland.
No comments:
Post a Comment