Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Masuku Bongani. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Masuku Bongani. Show all posts

Tuesday, 10 November 2015

SWAZILAND, AN ‘OPEN-AIR PRISON’

Swaziland has become an ‘open-air prison, a militarised society and a royal farm’ in which people become mere farmworkers for the King and his family, according to new research published in an international academic journal.

‘The autocratic system parasitically feeds off the labour of the poor, whose primary reason for existence is to work for the royal family and reproduce future workers of the same’, Bongani Masuku and Peter Limb conclude.

Masuku and Limb say that the education system in the kingdom, ruled by King Mswati III as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch, is in decline and only 6 percent of high school graduates go on to further education.

‘The aim appears to be to deny wider educational opportunities and discourage various forms of critical thinking and action so that more and more people see success tied to the mercy of the King, whose propaganda is pushed on state-owned radio and exploited in cultural spheres,’ they write in the Review of African Political Economy.

They say, ‘Many rural areas lack basic services such as clean water, health facilities, schools and roads whilst the royal family and its politicians enjoy lavish lifestyles.’

Masuku, the International Relations Secretary of the Congress of South African Trade Unions and Limb, of the Michigan State University, United States, analyse the present state of ‘political freedom and democracy’ in Swaziland.

They say the monarchy ‘exercises absolute power’ through the system of governance known as tinkhundla. The royal family controls key economic sectors and has its ‘footstalls’ in the form of chiefs at community levels.

They add that key appointments of power are exclusively the King’s prerogative. ‘He appoints the prime minister, chief justice, principal secretaries and political commissions. State legal immunity, absence of political parties and suppression of the media and civil society undermine the rule of law and accountability.’

Friday, 13 December 2013

ANGER OVER MANDELA PRAYER BLOCKADE

The Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) has joined a growing chorus of condemnation of Swaziland for blocking a peaceful memorial service in the kingdom for Nelson Mandela on Friday (13 December 2013).

Bongani Masuku, COSATU Secretary of International Affairs, said, ‘It is the most desperate act of shame imaginable.’

Swaziland police blocked the Lutheran Church in Manzini, Swaziland’s main business city, to stop a service to mourn the death of Mandela. It had been organised by the Swaziland United DemocraticFront (SUDF), an organisation that is campaigning for democracy in Swaziland, where King Mswati III rules as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch.

Masuku said in a statement, ‘When the whole world recognises that whether you want freedom or not, it shall eventually come, we have a denialist of note in Mswati. He still entertains the illusion that he can stop the tide of freedom by closing out those who represents the best in human values.’

Earlier, the People’s United Democratic Movement (PUDEMO), a political party, which like all others is banned in Swaziland, said, ‘Swaziland has proven yet again to be the skunk of the world by breaking up a peaceful memorial service to honour Mandela.’

It added, ‘The Swazi regime continues to show its intolerance for anything resembling democracy by forcing a halt of a Mandela memorial in Swaziland.’

Masuku of COSATU said, ‘In the same way that the apartheid regime failed to stop Madiba for more than 30 years of the long walk, they won't stop the people of Swaziland and the world in pushing forward with the cause. Mandela was labelled a terrorist in apartheid RSA [South Africa] and PUDEMO have been declared terrorists too, what a striking similarity, what a common future for all freedom fighters.’

See also

MANDELA MEMORIAL FREEDOM PLEDGE
SWAZI POLICE BREAK UP MANDELA PRAYERS

Thursday, 3 July 2008

SWAZILAND KING AS ‘PEACEMAKER’

Swaziland’s King Mswati III is set to have a bigger role in trying to solve Zimbabwe’s elections crisis.

The king will continue in a ‘peacemaking role’, following on from his chairmanship of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Organ Troika Summit that met days before Robert Mugabe stole the election in Zimbabwe at the end of last month (June 2008).

The king is soon to be appointed as permanent chair of the Organ Troika, the Swazi Observer reports today (3 July 2008). It says that ‘observers view this as a strategic position for the king to continue with his peacemaking role’.

The newspaper that is known to be close to the king reports a ‘political analyst’ saying that South African president Thabo Mbeki now needed to understand the importance of working with King Mswati.

As I reported last week, King Mswati’s role in trying to ensure that there is a ‘free and fair’ election in Zimbabwe has raised some eyebrows on the international scene. Swaziland is not a democracy and its own elections are far from free.

Only yesterday I reported that the European Union (EU) had turned down an invitation to ‘observe’ Swaziland’s forthcoming national election, because the EU thinks there are ‘shortcomings’ in the kingdom’s democracy.

Today, a leading trade unionist in South Africa has criticised King Mswati for showing an ‘arrogant and extreme display of double standards’ over Zimbabwe.

Bongani Masuku, International Relations Secretary of the Congress of South African Trade Unions, has sent an ‘personal letter to the media’ in which he points out that Swaziland’s elections are a sham.

Since it is unlikely that any of the media in Swaziland are going to give space to Masuku, here is an extended extract from the letter.

The full letter was published by Africa Contact (Denmark) which is distributed throughout Southern Africa, Europe and the United States of America.

Discussing King Mswati III, Masuku says,

‘Here is a man who bans political parties and all forms of political activity from his country, he has appointed himself the goliath of Swazi political affairs and has, through brutal bully tactics, outlawed and persecuted political opposition in his country, presiding over a major political discussion to determine the plight of an election and what environment is necessary for that election to be deemed free and fair or democratic enough for the effective and full participation of the peoples of our sister country, Zimbabwe.

‘He has no shame, whatsoever, that his guilt would haunt him about the very situation in his backyard, where as he chaired the very proceedings, political parties remained banned, all forms of protest remain criminalized and decisions about the country’s future lies with him and a bunch of his rotten sycophants and cheerleaders.

‘For him, the situation of the Zimbabwean people is a distant reality that has no relevant bearing to the immediate conditions of his own home yard. It is about some people far away in space, whose fundamental concerns are not about living beings, similar to those who, for years, have been subjected to the most extreme forms of royal oppression, using state of emergency decreed in 1973 by himself.

‘In a typical Machiavellian style, Mswati is guilty of the same crimes he has, hypocritically, put on the doorstep of his colleague, Mugabe.

‘What are the conditions prevailing in Swaziland that the “benevolent” Mswati would like us to believe he does not condone or he condemns in Zimbabwe; political parties remain banned, rights to organize and speak freely are outlawed and only the royal family has a right to monopoly over public political life and all institutions that have failed the people of Zimbabwe, such as the media, judiciary and all the supposed safeguards of a democratic society, which are virtually a sham, if not a total royal mirage in Swaziland, serving to massage the fragile ego of the corrupt monarchy.

‘In a desperate attempt to bail out his discredited image, following his disgraceful elections controversy and political shambles into which he has driven the country, Mswati needed something that would divert his attention away from his mess and this scenario presented that opportunity.’

The letter goes on, ‘One wonders whether SADC will ever wake up to the reality of the need for credible, consistent and democratic leadership. George Bush certainly can’t tell any other head of state to resolve conflicts peacefully, in the same breadth and vein that Mswati can never tell any other head of state to hold democratic and free elections much against his record.

‘Swaziland is going for “royal elections” soon, however conditions for free elections are not anywhere nearer. The constitution affirms the historic ban on political parties, criminalization of free political activities, suppressing of all institutions of justice and information, and continued monopoly leverage by the royal family over public affairs. What will the newly found preacher of democracy tell the world about his own conduct and lessons from the Zimbabwean situation?’


See also
EU SNUBS SWAZILAND ELECTION
SWAZI-ZIMBABWE SUMMIT UPDATE