Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Hlatshwayo Vuyisile. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hlatshwayo Vuyisile. Show all posts

Saturday, 2 February 2013

MISA BACKS GOVT ATTACK ON ‘TIMES’



Media Institute of Southern Africa - Swaziland Chapter
Media Alert, February 1, 2013

Government tells media to sort itself out

The government of Swaziland is aware that the media is acting irresponsibly.

Principal Secretary of the Ministry of Information, Communication and Technology, Sikelela Dlamini, issued a statement on 30 January 2013, in which he criticises the Times of Swaziland Sunday, a weekly tabloid, for breaching not only its own code of ethics but also the country’s Constitution.

The ministry was responding to an article published by the Times of Swaziland Sunday on 27 January 2013 under the headline ‘The Naked Truth?’. The article chronicled the fallout between a Swazi diplomat based in London and her former Zimbabwean boyfriend. He is allegedly trying to recover money from her, and because she allegedly refused – or didn’t repay what he thought was the required amount – he posted a series of intimate and naked photos of her to Swazi diplomatic offices as well as posting the photos online. It is a seemingly a simple yet messy case of blackmail. And it is not unreasonable to suggest that none of this should have entered the public domain in the first place.

However, the Times of Swaziland Sunday – published by the Times of Swaziland Group of Newspaper – ran a lopsided story and published a naked photo of the woman with her breasts, private parts and face blurred. The photo does not protect her identity nor does it respect her right to privacy, despite ‘efforts’ to the contrary.

The ICT ministry was “horrified” by the story and the photo, stating that freedom of expression could not be used to breach professional boundaries or used to overstep ethical or legislative limitations.

“The recent blatant publication of indecent photography of one of our female Citizens, who equally enjoys protective Constitutional provisions, has generated wide public outcry… while questioning the professional discretion of certain establishments [The Times of Swaziland], within the local press corps.”  

The Swaziland chapter of the Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA-Swaziland) is the first to decry the endemic censorship in the kingdom, however on this issue, we acknowledge the position of government.

The ICT ministry may not have the finest record on matters of freedom of speech, but MISA-Swaziland must give credit where it is due. The government is invoking the media code of ethics and the Constitution as it was meant to be invoked: to protect people from degrading and inhuman treatment.

As it stands, in early 2013, there is no operating independent media complaints commission (MCC) in Swaziland. It only exists on paper, however after its ‘launch’ in mid-2011 it failed to get off the ground. This commission has been in ‘discussion phase’ for ten years. MISA-Swaziland urges members of the MCC, Swaziland National Association of Journalists (SNAJ), and Swaziland Editors Forum (SEF) to push hard to get the MCC operating. If there was an operating and trusted complaints commission, aggrieved or defamed citizens – such as the woman who has had her naked body unwittingly splashed into the public’s view – could approach this organisation to seek an apology, resolution, or some other form of damages. Moreover, with a self-regulatory ‘mechanism’ in place the government will be less inclined to introduce a statutory media tribunal.

The government has been telling the media to ‘sort itself out’ for a long time. MISA-Swaziland shares this sentiment, and will continue working with the media and the government to ensure progress is made.

National Director of MISA-Swaziland Vuyisile Hlatshwayo said the Times of Swaziland Sunday was “wrong” to run the story and publish the photo, thereby feeding into a former lover’s blackmail plot.

“It is obscene,” he said. “We have a constitution that should protect against this sort of thing. Article 18 speaks of 'protection from inhuman or degrading treatment'. In MISA’s view, the publication of the photo is in direct violation of the Swaziland Constitution.

“The reason why this happens – unethical stories and photos get published – is because there is a lot repression and censorship when it comes to ‘real’ and ‘hard’ news, therefore the media has resorted to tabloid journalism, which thrives on scandals.

“In other words,” Hlatshwayo continues, “it is this soft and superficial news which is increasingly creeping into our media. MISA urges the Swazi media to be courageous enough to tackle issues which are in the public interest, rather than focusing on scandals and stories of insignificance." 



See also
‘TIMES SUNDAY’ ENCOURAGES BLACKMAIL

Thursday, 31 January 2013

‘TIMES SUNDAY’ ENCOURAGES BLACKMAIL



The Times Sunday newspaper in Swaziland has come under renewed criticism for its sensationalist journalism after it published a photograph of a blackmail victim and gave intimate details of her love life.

Under a headline ‘The naked truth’ it revealed that the former boyfriend of the woman had put nude pictures of her on Facebook and sent copies to her work colleagues and others who would know her. 

The Times Sunday did not name the woman but did name her ex-boyfriend and published a photograph of the couple with their arms around each other. Although the newspaper put a black strip across the woman’s eyes she would be clearly identifiable to people who knew her and her ex-boyfriend. The newspaper also gave enough details of her place of work to make identification easy.

Vuyisile Hlatshwayo, national director of the Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA) Swaziland chapter, in a statement to Swazi Media Commentary said, ‘It is wrong and it is obscene. We have a constitution that should protect against this sort of thing. Article 18 speaks of “protection from inhuman or degrading treatment”. In MISA’s view, the publication of the photo is in direct violation of the Swaziland Constitution.’

The ex-boyfriend told the Times Sunday his intention was to get the woman to pay him 9,000 British pounds – money he claimed she owed him. When she refused to pay, he published the photographs.

The ex-boyfriend told the paper said that by publishing the photographs, he wanted to make sure that his ex-girlfriend lost her job. He threatened that he would not stop spreading them until this happened.

‘He will not stop exposing her dirty linen until she paid the money,’ the newspaper said.

He told the newspaper, ‘I warned her of the consequences of going public. She did not care, so here we are now.’

The Times Sunday quoted an email the man had sent to his ex-girlfriend’s sister in which he said, ‘You have seen nothing yet. Days and weeks to come videos will be circulating in Swaziland and everywhere.’

By publishing his story, the Times Sunday in effect became an accessory to his blackmail.

This is not the first time the Times Sunday has been criticised for its sensationalist and misogynist reporting. In December 2012, readers boycotted the newspaper and complained to the paper’s advertisers after it published an article from one of its regular columnists that, among other criticisms, called women who leave their physically abusive partners ‘bitches’. 

The Times of Swaziland’s reader’s representative, the ombudsman, dismissed the complaints and said the newspaper always followed the kingdom’s journalism codes of ethics.

But, clearly it does not. The latest report violates a number of the Swaziland National Association of Journalists (SNAJ) code of conduct.

Article 5 is about ‘ Respect for Privacy and Human Dignity’ and it breaks down into five sections: (i) ‘Journalists should respect the right of the individual, privacy and human dignity; (ii) Inquiries and intrusions into a person’s private life can only be justified when done in the public interest; (iii) a journalist should guard against defamation, libel, slander and obscenity; (iv) a journalists shall avoid identifying the exact place of survivors in sexual offences;(v) a journalist shall seek consent of the survivor before taking pictures or conducting interviews with survivors of sexual offences.

If we substitute the word ‘blackmail’ for ‘sexual offences’, the Times breaks all five of the sections in Article 5.

The story has no public interest: it is basically a tale about two people who had a relationship that broke down and then disagreed about dispersal of their assets. The Times intrudes on many aspects of the woman’s private life for no other reason than dwell on the sexual allegations made by her ex-boyfriend.

The Times took the opportunity to turn an ordinary private matter into a public spectacle, drooling over naked pictures and descriptions of the couple’s sex lives.

Vuyisile Hlatshwayo, of  MISA, summed up the criticism of the Times, ‘The reason why this happens - obscene and unethical photos get published - is because there is a lot of repression and censorship when it comes to “real” and “hard” news, therefore the media has resorted to tabloid journalism, which thrives on scandals.

‘In other words, it is this soft and superficial news which is increasingly creeping into our media. MISA urges the Swazi media to be courageous enough to tackle issues which are in the public interest, rather than focusing on scandals and stories of insignificance.’ 

See also

THE STATE OF SWAZI JOURNALISM, 2013