Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Parker Maurice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Parker Maurice. Show all posts

Sunday, 28 June 2015

SWAZILAND’S MASSIVE MILITARY SPENDING

A new report shows Swaziland spent US$259.8 million on its military in the past three years. 

In 2014 military spending amounted to 5.9 percent of all government, spending in Swaziland, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) in its Military Expenditure Database for 2015.

The military spending amounted to 2.2 percent of Swaziland’s entire gross domestic product (GDP).

Swaziland has a population of nearly 1.3 million people. Seven in ten of them live in abject poverty, with incomes of less than US$2 per day.

In the calendar year 2014, Swaziland’s military spending was estimated to be US$80.6 million; about the equivalent of US$62 for every person in the kingdom.

King Mswati III, who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch, and the government he handpicks, refuse to publicly discuss military spending citing ‘national security’ issues as an excuse.

Swaziland is a tiny landlocked kingdom and is not at war and there are no potential enemies at the borders ready to invade. Swaziland’s international obligations in the military arena are few, and Swazi troops are not expected to be deployed abroad anytime soon.

Despite the reluctance of the King and Government to discuss military spending it is possible to piece together a picture of what might be behind the large spending.

In 2011, the Swazi Government set aside more than E1 billion (US$100 million) for spending on the army and police force and the then Finance Minister Majozi Sithole admitted that the army was prepared for an uprising by the population in Swaziland.

This followed a series of prodemocracy uprisings in North Africa, leading to what became known as the ‘Arab Spring’. King Mswati was fearful something similar could happen in his kingdom.  A Facebook group calling itself the April 12 Uprising had already called for an overthrow of the King.

In February 2011, Sithole told an open stakeholder dialogue on the 2011-2012 budget and Fiscal Adjustment Roadmap, ‘Yes, we are spending a lot on the army but we are not anticipating what is happening in North Africa to come here,’ he said.

He added, ‘However, the army is there to avoid such situations.’ 

In 2009, the Swazi Government was revealed to be engaged in arms dealing by the United States. A diplomatic cable written by Maurice Parker, the then US Ambassador to Swaziland, and later published by WikiLeaks revealed that the UK Government had blocked an arms deal between a UK company Unionlet and the Swaziland Government because it feared their ‘possible use for internal repression’. 

The Swazi Government wanted to buy equipment worth US$60 million.

Among items listed for purchase were, ‘3 Bell Model UH-1H helicopters, FN Herstal 7.6251mm Minimi light machine guns, blank and tracer ammunition, armored personnel carriers, command and control vehicles including one fitted with a 12.7x99mm M2 Browning heavy machine gun and others fitted with the FN Herstal light machine guns, military ambulances, armored repair and recovery vehicles, weapon sights, military image intensifier equipment, optical target surveillance equipment, 620 Heckler & Koch G36E assault rifles, 240 Heckler & Koch G36K assault rifles, 65 Heckler & Koch G36E rifles, 75 Heckler & Koch UMP submachine guns 9x19mm, and 35 Heckler & Koch USP semi-automatic pistols’.

The Swaziland Government said it wanted the items to fulfil its United Nations ‘peacekeeping’ obligations in Africa.

The UK Government did not believe it and thought either the weapons would be used against the Swazi civilian population, or they were being bought in order to sell on to another country, possibly Iran. The UK Government blocked the deal.

In his diplomatic cable, Parker said, ‘The array of weapons requested would not be needed for the first phases of peacekeeping, although it is possible someone tried to convince the Swazi government they were required. The GKOS [Government of the Kingdom of Swaziland] may have been attempting to build up domestic capability to deal with unrest, or was possibly acting as an intermediary for a third party such as Zimbabwe or a Middle Eastern country that had cash, diamonds or goods to trade.’

The Guardian newspaper in the United Kingdom, which first broke the story, reported at the time, Swaziland had a poor human rights record which was criticised by the US state department in its 2009 report (the year the deal was to have taken place).

‘Government agents continued to commit or condone serious abuses, and the human rights situation in the country deteriorated. Human rights problems included inability of citizens to change their government; extrajudicial killings by security forces; mob killings; police use of torture, beatings, and excessive force on detainees,’ the report said.

In the months before the attempted arms sale, Swaziland’s government declared the People’s United Democratic Movement (PUDEMO) the main opposition political party a terrorist organisation and arrested its leader, Mario Masuku.

Once the cable became public in 2011, John Kunene, Principal Secretary in the Ministry of Defence, who signed the original deal in 2008, said the kingdom had never given up trying to buy the weapons.

The Swazi News, an independent newspaper in Swaziland, reported (26 February 2011) that Kunene was still trying to broker a deal. 

In March 2011 Lutfo Dlamini, who was then Minister of Defence, denied the Wikileaks report and, according to a report in the Times of Swaziland, told the Swazi Senate there was at no stage where the country spoke of purchasing guns.  

The Swazi Observer reported him saying, ‘We never bought any guns anywhere and never spent E429 million. The information leaked was misleading, it was written by someone who had his own agendas.’

Clearly, Lutfo Dlamini was not telling the truth since Kunene had already confirmed that he was still trying to broker the deal.

In March 2011 Kunene was sacked from his job after a disclosure that the Umbutfu Swaziland Defence Force (the army) had run out of food to feed its soldiers. 

A month after the Wikleaks revelation about possible arms sales to the Middle East, the AFP news agency reported Swaziland was importing two containers of firearms through a Mozambican port. 

AFP quoted Mozambican state daily newspaper Noticias as its source. It reported the arms arrived in Maputo, the Mozambican capital, on a Panamanian vessel on 28 February 2011 from an unspecified country.

Swaziland is in effect broke and has been struggling for the past four years to come up with a recovery package that could revive the economy. It has ignored advice from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to cut its public service wage bill and to increase the amount of money it collects in taxation. The IMF wants moneys to be transferred from capital expenditure projects to help poor and disadvantaged people.

In March 2013 it was revealed that the Swazi government had sold US$3 million worth of maize donated by Japan as humanitarian aid to feed malnourished people, including children. It put the money raised in a special account at the Central Bank of Swaziland.  

See also

SECRET ARMS DEAL FOR IRAN
SWAZILAND AND SECRET ARMS DEAL
SUPPORT FOR BLOCK ON SWAZI ARMS
ARMS SHIPMENT HEADS TO SWAZILAND
 

Saturday, 26 February 2011

SWAZILAND ARMS DEAL ‘IS STILL ON’

Swaziland is still trying to buy the US$60m (E429 million) worth of weapons, the UK Government refused to allow.


John Kunene, Principal Secretary in the Ministry of Defence, who signed the original deal in 2008 said the kingdom had never given up trying to buy the weapons.


It was revealed by Wikileaks this week that the Swazi Government wanted to buy the weapons through an arms broker in the UK called Unionlet. The UK Government refused to allow the deal to go through because it believed the weapons would be used by the Swazi Government to suppress its own people, or they would be sold on to another country, possibly Zimbabwe or Iran.


Among the weapons were assault rifles, heavy machine guns, armoured personnel carriers and helicopters.


The Swazi News, an independent newspaper in Swaziland, reports today (26 February 2011) that Kunene is still trying to broker a deal.


‘We have been in constant discussion with Unionlet in buying arms for peacekeeping exercises in other countries, and have never abandoned the idea,’ the newspaper reports Kunene saying.


Kunene said the United Nations would reimburse the money Swaziland spent on the weapons. He said the weapons would be kept in Swaziland.


He attacked Maurice Parker, the former US Ambassador to Swaziland, who had raised concerns in 2009 that the weapons could be used to suppress the Swazi population or be sold on.


He told the Swazi News that Parker’s allegation was ‘unfortunate’ and he accused him of interfering in the affairs of Swaziland.


The Swazi News reported Kunene saying, Swaziland is a sovereign state and can purchase anything, including arms, as long as the laws have been followed. ‘This will mean there is interference into the affairs of the country.’


See also


SWAZI ‘SECRET ARMS DEAL FOR IRAN’

http://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2011/02/swazi-secret-arms-deal-for-iran.html

Thursday, 24 February 2011

SUPPORT FOR BLOCK ON SWAZI ARMS

Action for Southern Africa (ACTSA) has welcomed the news that the UK Government refused to allow a shipment of arms worth US$60 million to be sold to Swaziland. In the following media statement ACTSA says, ‘Britain was right to block the shipment. In recent years Swaziland has experienced a massive increase in the use of force to crush dissent. King Mswati III rules a population of just over one million people by authoritarian means; political and civic activists are threatened and imprisoned. There is less political freedom than in Zimbabwe.’


Swaziland: Wikileaks documents shows government prioritises repression over poverty and democracy, says ACTSA


24 February 2011


According to a US diplomatic cable, released by Wikileaks, the British Government refused a US$60M export licence for assault rifles, heavy machine guns, armoured personnel carriers and helicopters to be exported to Swaziland in 2008.


The leaked cables show the US Ambassador to Swaziland suggested the arms might be destined for ‘a middle eastern country’, however, it is more likely that they were for use in Swaziland itself. Official documents show the British government’s concern was these arms may be used for internal repression.


Britain was right to block the shipment. In recent years Swaziland has experienced a massive increase in the use of force to crush dissent. King Mswati III rules a population of just over one million people by authoritarian means; political and civic activists are threatened and imprisoned. There is less political freedom than in Zimbabwe.


Swaziland is in a major economic crisis yet is proposing to spend almost 10 per cent of its 2011-12 budget on the army and police. On 23 February the Minister of Finance Majozi Sithole said “Yes, we are spending a lot on the army but we are not anticipating what is happening in North Africa to come here…However, the army is there to avoid such situations.”


The king and his government spend money the country does not have lining their pockets and buying weapons of repression. They are cutting jobs and services which will undoubtedly drive the nation’s poorest deeper into poverty.


Tony Dykes, Director of ACTSA said, “We are pleased that the British Government blocked this shipment of arms to Swaziland. We hope they did not get the arms from anywhere else. The Swazi government has an appalling record of crushing dissent. For a country enduring a major financial crisis, where 70 per cent of the population live in absolute poverty, it cannot be right for a government to prioritise repression over tackling poverty and supporting democracy.”


See also


SWAZI ‘SECRET ARMS DEAL FOR IRAN’

http://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2011/02/swazi-secret-arms-deal-for-iran.html

E1bn SPEND TO STOP SWAZI UPRISING

The Swaziland Government is spending more than E1 billion this year on the army and police force to try to avoid an uprising of the Swazi population.


Majozi Sithole admitted as much yesterday (23 February 2011) at an ‘open stakeholder dialogue on the 2011-2012 budget and Fiscal Adjustment Roadmap’.


‘Yes, we are spending a lot on the army but we are not anticipating what is happening in North Africa to come here,’ he said.


‘However, the army is there to avoid such situations,’ the minister warned.


Sithole was responding to a question about why so much money was being spent on the army and police – the total budget for Swaziland in the coming year is only E10.7 billion. The budget for the army and police is the equivalent of about half the national budget deficit (E2.243 billion for the 2011/12 fiscal year).


Or put another way, if this vast money wasn’t spent, Swaziland wouldn’t be in the economic mess that it is.


It is difficult to see why the Swaziland Government wants to spend E1 billion on the army and police, unless it is to be able to use the forces against the civilian population. Swaziland is not at war and it has no serious foreign affairs commitments that require it to have a large army.


A clue to the thinking of the Swaziland Government, appointed by King Mswati III, sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch, came yesterday via a Wikileaks United States diplomatic cable.


The cable, written in 2009 by Maurice Parker, the then US Ambassador to Swaziland, revealed that the UK Government had blocked an arms deal between a UK company and the Swaziland Government because it feared their ‘possible use for internal repression’.


The Swazi Government wanted to buy equipment worth US$60 million (E426 million).


Among items listed for purchase were, ‘3 Bell Model UH-1H helicopters, FN Herstal 7.6251mm Minimi light machine guns, blank and tracer ammunition, armored personnel carriers, command and control vehicles including one fitted with a 12.7x99mm M2 Browning heavy machine gun and others fitted with the FN Herstal light machine guns, military ambulances, armored repair and recovery vehicles, weapon sights, military image intensifier equipment, optical target surveillance equipment, 620 Heckler & Koch G36E assault rifles, 240 Heckler & Koch G36K assault rifles, 65 Heckler & Koch G36E rifles, 75 Heckler & Koch UMP submachine guns 9x19mm, and 35 Heckler & Koch USP semi-automatic pistols’.


The Swaziland Government said it wanted the items to fulfil its United Nations ‘peacekeeping’ obligations in Africa.


The UK Government didn’t believe a word of it and thought either the weapons would be used against the Swazi civilian population, or they were being bought in order to sell on to another country. The UK Government blocked the deal.

In his diplomatic cable, Parker said, ‘The array of weapons requested would not be needed for the first phases of peacekeeping, although it is possible someone tried to convince the Swazi government they were required. The GKOS [Government of the Kingdom of Swaziland] may have been attempting to build up domestic capability to deal with unrest, or was possibly acting as an intermediary for a third party such as Zimbabwe or a Middle Eastern country that had cash, diamonds or goods to trade.’

As the Guardian newspaper reminded its readers, Swaziland has a poor human rights record which was criticised by the US state department in its 2009 report (the year the deal was to have taken place).

‘Government agents continued to commit or condone serious abuses, and the human rights situation in the country deteriorated. Human rights problems included inability of citizens to change their government; extrajudicial killings by security forces; mob killings; police use of torture, beatings, and excessive force on detainees,’ the report said.

In the months before the attempted arms sale, Swaziland's government declared the People’s United Democratic Movement (PUDEMO) the main opposition political party a terrorist organisation, and arrested its leader, Mario Masuku.

See also


SWAZI ‘SECRET ARMS DEAL FOR IRAN’

http://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2011/02/swazi-secret-arms-deal-for-iran.html

‘ARMS DEAL’: FULL WIKILEAKS CABLE

Swaziland is being accused of attempting to broker an arms deal between the UK and Iran. Wikileaks published a cable from the US Embassy in Swaziland that gave details of a US$60 million package that would have included helicopters, armored personnel carriers, command and control vehicles, a field ambulance, machine guns, assault rifles and ammunition.


Below is the full cable written by the then US Ambassador to Swaziland, Maurice Parker in June 2009.


Wikileaks has XXXXXX names of some people to protect their identities.


SOURCE


[ID:211524 Cable dated:2009-06-11T15:27:00]
S E C R E T MBABANE 000141

DEPT FOR DS/IP/AF, DS/IP/ITA; AF/S (MJWILLS,EPELLETREU, MHARRIS); AF/RSA; LONDON, PARIS FOR AFRICA WATCH

SECRET

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/09/2019
TAGS: KDEM, PGOV, PINR, PREL, WZ, PINS, MASS, ETTC, XF">XF


SUBJECT: SWAZILAND ARMS PURCHASE ATTEMPTED


Classified By: AMB. MAURICE PARKER FOR REASONS 1.4 (b) AND (d)


1. (S) SUMMARY: In December 2008, the GKOS sought to purchase approximately 60 million USD worth of military equipment, including helicopters, vehicles, weapons, and ammunition from a British weapons manufacturer. The British government denied the request over end-use concerns. In documents requesting permission to purchase the equipment, Swaziland's Ministry of Defense stated that the equipment was for use by the Umbutfo Swaziland Defense Force (USDF) on United Nations peacekeeping deployment in Africa. It is unclear whether this was the intended purpose, or whether GKOS was attempting to build up domestic capability to deal with unrest, or was possibly acting as an intermediary for a third party. END SUMMARY


2. (S) In December 2008, the GKOS sought to purchase approximately 60 million USD worth of military equipment from British weapons manufacturer Unionlet Limited (please protect). The British government denied the request over end-use concerns. A senior level contact with the British High Commission in Pretoria (please protect) recently provided Ambassador Parker with documentation on the attempted purchase.


3. (S) The purchase application, signed by XXXXXXXXXXXX, included requests for 3 Bell Model UH-1H helicopters, FN Herstal 7.6251mm Minimi light machine guns, blank and tracer ammunition, armored personnel carriers, command and control vehicles including one fitted with a 12.7x99mm M2 Browning heavy machine gun and others fitted with the FN Herstal light machine guns, military ambulances, armored repair and recovery vehicles, weapon sights, military image intensifier equipment, optical target surveillance equipment, 620 Heckler & Koch G36E assault rifles, 240 Heckler & Koch G36K assault rifles, 65 Heckler & Koch G36E rifles, 75 Heckler & Koch UMP submachine guns 9x19mm, and 35 Heckler & Koch USP semi-automatic pistols. SwazilandQs Ministry of Defense stated in the purchase documents that the equipment was for use by the Umbutfo Swaziland Defense Force on United Nations peacekeeping deployment in Africa.


4. (S) COMMENT: Post is disappointed that XXXXXXXXXXXX did not disclose anything about this request to Ambassador Parker or DATT Langdorf in one of several very candid and private discussions since this order was placed. If XXXXXXXXXXXX were coerced into making the order, he might have been embarrassed to discuss it, though from his experience, one would think he would assume we would find out about it and that he might have wanted to do damage control.


5. (S) The array of weapons requested would not be needed for the first phases of peacekeeping, although it is possible someone tried to convince the Swazi government they were required. The GKOS may have been attempting to build up domestic capability to deal with unrest, or was possibly acting as an intermediary for a third party such as Zimbabwe or a Middle Eastern country that had cash, diamonds or goods to trade. XXXXXXXXXXXX, traveled to Iran and later to Libya, and several GKOS Ministers made trips to Kuwait, Dubai, and other Arab nations. We also understand that an Iranian ambassador, resident in either Pretoria or Maputo, recently presented his letters of credence to King Mswati to establish formal diplomatic relations with Swaziland.


6. (S) We are not aware of subsequent purchase requests. XXXXXXXXXXXX


7. (S) Please protect information on the identity of the British weapons manufacturer. The British contact providing documentation for this purchase informed Ambassador Parker that if the information becomes public, the manufacturer could sue the British Government for violating confidentiality. ENDCOMMENT.


PARKER


See also

SWAZI ‘SECRET ARMS DEAL FOR IRAN’

http://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2011/02/swazi-secret-arms-deal-for-iran.html