Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Swazi News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Swazi News. Show all posts

Monday, 23 October 2017

WIVES SAY HUSBANDS CAN RAPE THEM

Four of six married women interviewed by a newspaper in Swaziland said their husbands had the right to rape them.

The Swazi News reported on Saturday (21 October 2017) some wives said their husbands deserved sex whenever they wanted.

The newspaper did street interviews in the Swazi capital Mbabane. It did not say how this was done but the women appeared to have been chosen at random.

A Sexual Offences and Domestic Violence (SODV) Bill is stalled in the Swazi Parliament because traditionalists object to four clauses about incest, unlawful stalking, abduction and flashing. 

The newspaper reported, ‘With or without their consent, some women believe their husbands have a right to “rape” them.’

It added, ‘The reason given by four women out of the six interviewed was that part of their wifely duties was to provide sex to their husbands at all times.’

One woman said she had to give her husband ‘unlimited access to sex’ to stop him seeking pleasure elsewhere.

The Swazi News reported, ‘The women were of the view that their husbands should not be arrested because they were breadwinners.’

Section 151 of the SODV makes it clear that a marital relationship will not provide a defence against any offence.

Silindelo Nkosi, the Communication and Advocacy Officer for Swaziland Action Group Against Abuse (SWAGAA), told the newspaper that forced sex within a marriage was recognised by international conventions that Swaziland had signed as a crime.

However, the SODV Bill runs counter to tradition and culture in Swaziland, where King Mswati III rules as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch.  The Indigenous Law and Custom of the Kingdom of Swaziland, a document from 2013 that clarifies traditional law states that rape is committed only if the woman forced is not the man’s wife or lover.
 
It is not known how man husbands force themselves on their wives but recorded figures on rape have shown Swaziland to have the fourth highest rate of rape in the world. In 2015, a report from a US organisation ABCNewspoint stated there were 77.5 registered cases of rape among 100,000 people.

In traditional culture in Swaziland women are owned by their men (husbands or fathers). In 2015 a survey conducted in Swaziland suggested four in 10 women believed a husband was justified in beating his wife because he was the head of the household. 

The APA news agency said at the time a demographic health survey called the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey Comparative Report gave a number reasons for wife-beating which included; ‘if she refused to have sex with him, if she argued with him, if she went out without telling him, if she neglected the children and if she had sex with other men’.

APA reported, ‘Silindelo Nkosi, the Communication and Advocacy Officer for Swaziland Action Group Against Abuse (SWAGAA) said, “These beliefs of justifying abuse have increased to the worst rate resulting in more young women dying in the hands of their lovers or husbands.”’

It added, ‘Clinical Psychologist Ndo Mdlalose describes this as an abusive mentality where men also tend to claim they are correcting their women by beating them.’

In June 2008 it was reported that the National Democratic and Health Survey found that 40 percent of men in Swaziland said it is all right to beat women. The same year, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) found that the status of some women in Swaziland is so low that they are practically starved at meal times, because men folk eat first and if there is not enough food for everyone, the women must go without.

See also

SEX BILL HIGHLIGHTS CULTURE ISSUES
IN SWAZILAND, CHILD RAPE NOT UNUSUAL
http://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2012/12/in-swaziland-child-rape-not-unusual.html

Sunday, 21 April 2013

EDITOR: ‘SUN SETS ON MEDIA FREEDOM’



The editor of the Swazi News says she finds it ‘very scary’ to write for her newspaper following the High Court ruling that could send one of her fellow editors to jail for two years.

Phephisa Khoza said the decision to fine the Nation magazine editor Bheki Mukhubu E200,000 (US$22,000) or send him to jail if he does not pay by 23 April 2013, was ‘one of the harshest sentences to be handed down by our courts’.

Mukhubu was sentenced for ‘scandalising’ the courts after he wrote two articles for his magazine criticising the judiciary.

Writing in the Swazi News on Saturday (20 April 2013), Khoza said, ‘The sun has set on media freedom in the country.’

She said, ‘For a long time the country’s politicians have been saying media practitioners in the country are free to write on any issue.

‘As a journalist I find it very scary to write this piece. I do not know what those in charge of the administration of justice will perceive it as but the sentence on Bheki Mukhubu and The Nation magazine is one of the harshest sentences to be handed down by our courts.’

Khoza, edits the Swazi News, part of the Times of Swaziland group, which publishes the only independent daily newspaper in the kingdom ruled by King Mswati III’s, sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch.

Khoza said, ‘A free media is the epitome of democracy and basic liberties. A country’s freedom is measured through the way the country treats its media. An independent press should be the mirror of society and that helps to play the role of watchdogs where there are no political parties.

‘The world measures a free society through the freedom of its press.’

See also

FUND SET UP IN BID TO PAY EDITOR’S FINE

NOT FIRST ATTACK ON ‘NATION’ EDITOR

EDITOR’S SENTENCE ‘UNCONSTITUTIONAL’

EDITOR FACING JAIL TO APPEAL SENTENCE

VOICES SUPPORTING BELEAGUERED EDITOR

A TALE OF TWO SWAZI EDITORS

PUDEMO CONDEMNS EDITOR’S CONVICTION

ARTICLES THAT MIGHT GET EDITOR JAILED

SOUTH AFRICA EDITORS BACK MAKHUBU

HIGH COURT SUPPRESSES MEDIA FREEDOM

MISA: EDITOR’S CONVICTION ‘BRUTAL’

EDITOR’S CONTEMPT SENTENCE ‘SHOCKING’

EDITOR SET FOR TWO YEARS IN JAIL

Saturday, 12 November 2011

PANIC AS SALARIES CUT NEWS LEAKS















The Swaziland Government is panicking after an internal memo saying that salaries of public servants could not be paid this month and would be delayed by about two weeks was leaked yesterday (11 November 2011).

The memo (pictured), sent to the secretary to cabinet, all principal secretaries and all heads of department, got into the hands of pro-democracy activists and within hours the international news agencies AFP and Reuters had published the news.

Then the Swazi Government at first refused to confirm the memo existed and then hastily convened a late-night press conference to say the memo had been published in haste and the Cabinet would discuss the matter on Monday.

The memo signed by Fikisiwe Mabila, the Acting Accountant General, said that salaries that should be paid on 20 November 2011 would be paid on various dates from 5 – 8 December.

The memo gave no reasoning for the delay, but it comes days after Majozi Sithole, the Swaziland Finance Minister, admitted that there was not enough money to government salaries this month. About E350 million is needed to pay the salaries.

This is as a result of the meltdown in the Swazi economy caused by years of financial mismanagement by successive governments handpicked by King Mswati III, sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch.

Once news of the memo became public yesterday, Percy Simelane, the government spokesperson, refused to confirm its existence. The Weekend Observer reports that he said he had not seen the memo, but had heard about it on the ‘grapevine’.

Then Sithole called an impromptu press conference last night withdrawing the memo, saying it had been issued in haste and that the cabinet would meet on Monday.

The fact that state-controlled radio SBIS had by then run with the story on its 6pm news bulletin suggests that the memo did have the official backing of government. The station is not known for its independent journalistic endeavour and it is inconceivable that it would have made the report without official approval.

The swift U-turn by the government came after angry reaction from union leaders.

Vincent Dlamini, secretary general of the National Public Service Allied Workers Union (NAPSAWU), told the AFP news agency, ‘In light of the developments, we call upon the workers of Swaziland to rise up and change their conditions. There shall be no messiah but only their power shall set them free.’

In a statement published in the Observer today (12 November 2011) (NAPSAWU) said there was no doubt that the news would lead to civil disobedience in Swaziland.

‘We do not expect government to have done that because there had been no consultations prior to the memo, this is an imposition. But since the beginning of the year our members have been on the streets, it is easy to predict the same would happen this time around.’

The Swazi News reports today, ‘Some people believe that government is using this as a litmus paper to provoke their reaction so that it gets a picture of how public servants would react once the proposed pay cuts are eventually implemented. Others think this is a strategy to deliberately rob the employees of one month’s salary as the trend of shifting pay dates progresses.’

See also

GOVT CAN’T PAY NOVEMBER SALARIES

http://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2011/11/govt-cant-pay-november-salaries.html

SWAZI FINANCE MINISTER LIES ONLOAN

http://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2011/11/finance-minister-lies-on-loan.html

Saturday, 16 July 2011

POLICE BLOCK PAPERS AT BORDER

The Sowetan newspaper from South Africa was held by police at the Swaziland border yesterday (15 July 2011) and copies were confiscated, because it carried an article critical of Michael Ramodibedi, the Swazi Chief Justice.

Copies of the newspaper that is usually freely available to buy in Swaziland were taken at the Ngwenya Border Post.

The Sowetan included an article reporting that the Law Society of Swaziland wanted the chief justice to be dismissed immediately for his mishandling of the judiciary in the kingdom, ruled by King Mswati III, sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch.

It also carried a report that the Times of Swaziland, the only independent newspaper in the kingdom, had received a High Court order to stop it publishing its own story about the Ramodibedi dispute.

The Swazi News, a companion newspaper to the Times, reports today that according to one of the distributors of the Sowetan, police officers forcefully confiscated copies of the newspaper which were going to various news-stands in the country.

Sources told the Swazi News that as early of 7am a considerable number of police officers had already been deployed at the border to ‘block’ two South African newspapers, the Mail and Guardian and the Sowetan.

The Sowetan was a bit delayed and arrived much later than the usual time. It is not reported what happened to the Mail and Guardian.

When the paper finally arrived in the vehicle for media couriers, the police on the Swazi side of the border confiscated it and took the copies to the police headquarters in Mbabane.

The police, it is reported, said they were acting on a court order.

Sources say the police confiscated the Sowetan newspaper and ‘detained’ the paper at the police headquarters for more than two hours.

They later handed it back to the distributors after finishing their ‘investigations’ after 10am, The Swazi News reports.

See also

LAWYERS CHARGE CHIEF JUSTICE

http://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2011/07/lawyers-charge-chief-justice.html

SWAZI LAWYERS BOYCOTT COURTS

http://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2011/07/swazi-lawyers-boycott-courts.html

Saturday, 2 July 2011

IN DEFENCE OF JUDGE THOMAS MASUKU

Letter to the editor


Swazi News


2 July 2011


SOURCE


In defence of Judge Thomas Masuku


Madam,


Please publish my email in your esteemed Swazi News, so I too may add my voice in defence of Judge Thomas Masuku, a loyal subject of His Majesty, King Mswati III, and a patriotic Swazi whose unwavering commitment is to work for a better Swaziland.


REALLY, CJ [Chief Justice]? Like all right-thinking Swazis and residents of Swaziland I am in a state of shock over what is happening to Judge Thomas Masuku, a truly patriotic professional and a man of integrity, whose interest is to see his beloved Swaziland having a functioning judiciary.


As a regular reader of The Times of Swaziland and its sister weekend papers, I have always found his reported judgments laced with compassion for his fellowman. So, I share the same sentiments as those expressed by ‘Dlamini’ in yesterday’s (Friday) Times of Swaziland that there’s some self-interest involved in all these flimsy allegations against this outstanding judge. I say ‘flimsy’ because, thanks to The Times of Swaziland’s reproduction of Masuku’s judgement extract, there’s nowhere where Masuku called His Majesty the King ‘fork-tongued’. But the CJ says he did!


The CJ’s actions smell of belly-crawling. Let us also remember, fellow-citizens of Swaziland, that this CJ has been surrounded by controversy since his arrival here in Swaziland. I also wish to remind the CJ of the wisdom of the sages that ‘If you decide to dig a hole for someone, make sure you dig two…"


Thank you, Judge Qinisile Mabuza, for standing up to be counted on the side of truth and justice. I pray and hope that as this man sets out to investigate Judge Thomas Masuku, the Law Society and the Human Rights lawyers will investigate him too.


There’s something phony here. Please expose it and put to pay the pettiness of this tongue-twister. Judge Thomas, you have our prayers. I once again join ‘Dlamini’ in calling out that, "Let us not sit back and watch the judicial system crumble like our economy," for here is the highest official of the judiciary on a self-serving mission. I also pray that the authorities see through this man and shudder at his obvious tactics of keeping his job.


Another Dlamini (L. Dlamini, Mbabane)

Saturday, 23 April 2011

'POLICE WILL KILL TERROR SUSPECT'


Community police will murder terror suspect Musa Ngubeni is he is allowed out on bail, a Swaziland magistrate court was told.



According to a report in the Swazi News, Kwaluseni community leader Indvuna Musa Dlamini said ‘the Kwaluseni community was not pleased with the serious offence he committed’. The paper quoted Indvuna Dlamini saying, ‘People are talking and if he would set foot in the community, the community police would kill him together with the people who are angry.’

Indvuna Dlamini was in court to speak about Ngubeni’s character and to oppose his bail. But, in an astonishing turn of events, he told the court that he didn’t actually know Ngubeni, but he did know his father well.

Despite Indvuna Dlamini’s ignorance, the court decided to side with him and denied bail.
If the Swazi News report is anything to go by, no one questioned why the court chose to rely on Indvuna Dlamini’s testimony even though he openly admitted he didn’t know Ngubeni.

Ngubeni, an activist with the banned Swaziland Youth Congress (SWAYOCO) was in court along with Maxwell Dlamini, president of the Swaziland National Union of Students.

They are charged under the Explosives Act 1961 with possessing explosives.

There were about 50 supporters at the court hearing on Thursday (21 April 2011). They reacted noisily when they heard that the police would murder Ngubeni. Senior Magistrate Msibi threatened to put them in jail if they didn’t shut up.

If the Swazi News account of the case is to be trusted, she made no comment about the murder threat.
The bail hearing was adjourned until Tuesday.

Although the pair have yet to stand trial, the Swazi News has already decided that they are guilty. Twice in its report it said the two men ‘committed’ the offence. The Times of Swaziland newspaper group should issue a correction and apology in the next available issue. It should, but I’m not holding my breath.