Search This Blog

Showing posts with label british virgin islands. Show all posts
Showing posts with label british virgin islands. Show all posts

Wednesday, 30 December 2015

NEW MOVE IN KING’S JET COURT DISPUTE



A court has confirmed that King Mswati III of Swaziland cannot sell or dispose of his private jet until a dispute over his alleged failure to pay a US$3.5 million debt is resolved.

The ruling was made in the British Virgin Islands on 23 December 2015after the East Caribbean High Court was told that there might be plans to lease the plane and then lease a second plane for King Mswati’s use.

There has been a long-running dispute between Shanmuga Rethenam, who owns a company called SG Air, and the King.

Rethenam, popularly known as Shan, succeeded in getting a freezing order from the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) in September 2015. 

SG Air claims that King Mswati owes it the money for repairs and modifications undertaken to his private McDonnell Douglas DC-9-87 aircraft in 2012. The case was heard in the Superior Court in Ontario, Canada, in June 2015, when the King won on a legal technicality.
 
However, pending possible appeals, King Mswati, through a company he owns called Inchatsavane, was forced to lodge a letter of credit for US$3.5 million with Canadian lawyers, in case he lost the appeal. The money was due to be released on 15 September 2015.

Since the Canadian court case, the Swazi Government announced it intended to try to lease out the aircraft, valued at about US$14.5 million, and in turn lease the King a larger, more luxurious jet, with the possibility of buying it at a later date.

The BVI Commercial Court was told the DC-9-87 was flown from Swaziland to South Africa and back again since September 2015. There was a dispute that this might violate the freezing order. The plane is presently at Matsapha Airport in Swaziland.

The freezing order means the King cannot dispose of the aircraft or its engines until the court case over the alleged debt is resolved.

The court order was made in the BVI because that is where SG Air is incorporated. 

The judgment of the BVI Commercial Court, delivered by Judge Gerald St. C. Farara, was that the freezing order on the aircraft’s movement should continue pending the outcome of the financial dispute.

See also

KING WINS JET CASE ON A TECHNICALITY


SWAZI KING NOT ABOVE LAW IN CANADA


Tuesday, 20 October 2015

KING: ‘I’VE NO ASSETS OUTSIDE SWAZILAND’

King Mswati III of Swaziland who was once reported to have a personal net worth of US$200 million has told a court that he has no assets outside of Swaziland.
 
He made his statement in a case where he is personally being sued over a US$3.5 million debt relating to repairs and improvements to his private jet aircraft. 

The Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) made a freezing order against the King, who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch, which meant he could not dispose of his jet until the debt dispute was resolved. King Mswati was also required by the court to disclose his assets. 

In an affidavit to the court, Sihle Dlamini, the King’s Private Secretary and Director of Administration at the King’s Office, who had been authorised by the King to swear on his behalf, stated the King had no ‘commercial assets’ outside of Swaziland. He also stated the King, ‘does not own any assets in the United Kingdom’ and that the King did not ‘own any assets in any overseas territories of the United Kingdom’.

He also stated that the King and the King’s company Inchatsavane, which is also being sued, ‘do not own any other property, solely or jointly, in their own name or not, in any other jurisdiction outside of Swaziland’.

King Mswati’s wealth is a closely guarded secret. In August 2007, Forbes magazine first disclosed that his personal net worth was US$200 million (E1.4 billion at the then exchange rate). That figure was revised downwards in later years. 

In June 2014, Forbes estimated his wealth had fallen to US$50 million, which made him the third wealthiest monarch in Africa. 

Forbes reported, ‘The King is one of Africa’s wealthiest royals. His personal net worth is at least $50 million, based on the annual $50 million salary that he is paid out of government coffers. 

‘He also controls Tibiyo TakaNgwane, an investment holding company that owns stakes in sugar refining giants Ubombo Sugar and Royal Swaziland Sugar Corporation (RSSC), dairy company Parmalat Swaziland, spirits manufacturer Swaziland Beverages and hotel chain Swazi Spa Holdings. The company has assets worth over $140 million, but he holds it in trust for the people of Swaziland.’

In 2012, Forbes named King Mswati as one of the top five worst rulers in Africa. 

It reported the King ruled over a kingdom which has one of the world’s highest HIV prevalence rates: over 35 percent of adults. Its average life expectancy is the lowest in the world at 33 years; nearly 70 percent of the country’s people live on less than US$1 a day and 40 percent are unemployed. 

It added, ‘But for all the suffering of the Swazi people, King Mswati has barely shown concern or interest. 

‘He lives lavishly, using his kingdom’s treasury to fund his expensive tastes in German automobiles, first-class leisure trips around the world and women. But his gross mismanagement of his country’s finances is now having dire economic consequences. Swaziland is going through a severe fiscal crisis. 

‘The kingdom’s economy is collapsing and pensions have been stopped. In June last year [2011], the King begged for a financial bailout from South Africa.’

In February 2011 the Mail & Guardian newspaper in South Africa reported King Mswati also had US$10-billion that was put in trust in King Mswati’s name for the people of Swaziland by his father, King Sobhuza II.

In 2015, a report from the United States government concluded there was no oversight in the kingdom on how the King, his 15 wives and vast Royal Family spent public money.

See also

KING DIVERTS WEALTH FROM HIS SUBJECTS
KINGDOM’S WEALTH STAYS WITH THE KING
KING MSWATI SPENDS AND SPENDS

Wednesday, 23 September 2015

SWAZI KING’S JET DISPUTE BACK IN COURT

A court has ordered that King Mswati III of Swaziland cannot sell or dispose of his private jet until a dispute over his alleged failure to pay a US$3.5 million debt is resolved.

This is part of a long-running legal dispute between Shanmuga Rethenam, who owns a company called SG Air, and the King.

Rethenam, popularly known as Shan, has succeeded in getting a freezing order from the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court in the British Virgin Islands (BVI). If the King fails to comply with the order he faces contempt of court charges and possible imprisonment.

SG Air claims that King Mswati owes it the money for repairs and modifications undertaken to his private McDonnell Douglas DC-9-87 aircraft in 2012. The case was heard in the Superior Court in Ontario, Canada, in June 2015, when the King won on a legal technicality.
 
However, pending possible appeals, King Mswati, through a company he owns called Inchatsavane, was forced to lodge a letter of credit for US$3.5 million with Canadian lawyers, in case he lost the appeal. The money was due to be released on 15 September 2015.

Since the Canadian court case, the Swazi Government announced it intended to try to lease out the aircraft, valued at about US$14.5 million, and in turn lease the King a larger, more luxurious jet, with the possibility of buying it at a later date.

The DC-9-87 is reportedly undergoing repairs in South Africa and one of its engines might be sent to the United Kingdom for further work. The BVI court freezing order applies to both South Africa and the UK.

The new freezing order means the King cannot dispose of the aircraft or its engines until the court case over the alleged debt is resolved.

The court order was made in the BVI because that is where SG Air is incorporated. It is impossible to take court action against King Mswati in Swaziland, because as the kingdom’s absolute monarch he is immune from the law.

See also

KING WINS JET CASE ON A TECHNICALITY
SWAZI KING NOT ABOVE LAW IN CANADA

Tuesday, 22 September 2015

SWAZI KING PERSONALLY SUED FOR US$1.5m

King Mswati III of Swaziland is to be personally sued for US$1.5 million after the collapse of the Ngwenya iron ore mine in his kingdom.

The court action will take place in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) because the King is immune from the law in Swaziland where he rules as an absolute monarch.

The case is expected to shed new light on the way the King does business with foreign investors and the control he exerts over them.

At one point it is said the King took US$1.5 million from the company running the Ngwenya mine to buy art work from a New York dealer. He refused to repay the company the money and it collapsed soon after with the loss of 700 jobs and debts to creditors of about US$4 million. 

The court case to be heard in the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court in BVI has been started by Shanmuga Rethenam, a businessman popularly known as Shan. In an affidavit to the court Shan stated that on 30 June 2011 King Mswati (referred to throughout the document as HMK) granted a seven-year mining lease to SG Iron, which was formerly known as Salgaocar Swaziland, to mine iron ore dumps left in the  Ngwenya mining area by the Anglo American Mining Corporation in the 1970s.

Twenty-five percent of the shares were issued to the Swaziland Government for no payment; 25 percent went to the King ‘in trust for the Swazi nation’, and 50 percent were issued to Southern Africa Resources Africa Limited (SARL), which was formerly known as Salgaocar Resources Africa Limited.

In his affidavit, Shan stated, ‘The arrangement by which HMK owned 25 percent of SG Iron “in trust for the Swazi nation” is a familiar one in Swaziland. I am aware that HMK owns the Tibiyo Taka Ngwane and Tisuka Taka Ngwane funds, which account for about half of Swaziland’s economy, on that basis. In my experience, HMK takes an active interest in the commercial success of his investments and commonly issues instructions through his representatives such as Mr Lutfo [Dlamini] or Mr Sihle [Dlamini], on commercial issues.’

Shan stated that SARL provided all the capital, more than US$50 million, and all the expertise to undertake the iron ore operations at Ngwenya.

He stated, ‘On 6 April 2012, HMK requested through Mr Sihle [the King’s representative on the company’s board] that SG Iron pay him an “advanced dividend,” which was in effect a loan of US$10 million. SG Iron’s directors were given no choice and so, on 16 April 2012, we resolved to agree to HMK’s “request” and to make the payment of US$10 million. It was HMK’s desire to avoid repaying this loan that subsequently led to the collapse of operations at the Ngwenya mine.

Shan added, ‘In about June 2011, shortly before the mining lease was awarded, I met HMK in Swaziland. He requested that SARL agree to pay him a personal benefit of US$0.50 per dry metric tonne of iron ore from the Ngwenya mine exported from Swaziland. SARL’s directors were given no choice and so we agreed to HMK’s “request”. SG Commodities [a company that trades in commodities] was to be the vehicle through which payments would be made, and the payments were always directed to third party recipients on HMK’s behalf, so that no payments would be made directly from SARL to HMK. Prior to December 2013, SARL paid HMK through SG Commodities approximately US$700,000 pursuant to that agreement.’

Shan added, ‘In or about October or early November 2013, I met HMK in Swaziland. He requested that SG Commodities agree to grant him a loan of US$1.5 million, to be repaid to SG Commodities out of the payments anticipated to be due to HMK pursuant to his agreement with SARL. SG Commodities was given no choice and so I agreed on SG Commodities’ behalf to HMK’s “request”. On 18 December 2013 Mr Sihle directed SG Commodities on HMK’s behalf to advance the US$1.5 million capital sum by making payment to a New York art dealer, Metropolitan Fine Arts & Antiques Inc, from whom HMK had purchased certain artworks.’

Shan added that in early 2014 King Mswati told him he was unable to repay his loan from SG Iron. 

In his affidavit, Shan stated, ‘To avoid his repayment obligations, HMK then set about engineering the collapse of SG Iron and expropriating SARL’s investment in Swaziland. On 21 August 2014, Mr Sihle issued an order on HMK’s behalf to SG Iron, without consulting or informing me or anyone else from SARL, to stop all sales of iron ore cargo from the Ngwenya mine. Mining operations were progressing satisfactorily and there was no proper reason to issue any such order. Indeed, the immediate result of the order was that perfectly saleable cargo began to stockpile. The inability to sell cargo cost SG Iron millions of dollars of working capital and created an artificial and wholly avoidable cashflow crisis.’

Shan added, ‘In September 2014, in the midst of the crisis, Mr Sihle demanded on HMK’s behalf that SARL agree to SG Iron writing off HMK’s debt to SG Iron, that SARL write off some of SG Iron’s US$57,186,022.53 debt to SARL and that SARL inject further capital into SG Iron. None of the steps demanded by Mr Sihle would have been necessary had HMK simply permitted the sales of cargo to resume, and would have been pointless since sales were prohibited, and so SARL refused. Mining operations collapsed shortly thereafter.’

Shan added, ‘Mr Sihle told me that HMK had instructed him to shut down SG Iron and to start afresh, and that if I did anything to retaliate then I would be arrested and an Interppol [international police] notice would be issued against me.’

Shan added, ‘What happened next illustrates the power of an absolute monarch who exercises complete control over Swaziland’s judiciary, as well as its legislative and executive branches of government. Mr Sihle applied on SG Iron’s behalf, without consulting or informing me or anyone else from SARL (and having intimidated me to prevent me from intervening as described above) to the High Court of Swaziland for orders which had the effect of destroying SG Iron and expropriating SARL’s investment in Swaziland. At HMK’s direction, the court appointed to SG Iron a judicial manager on 10 October 2014, a provisional liquidator on 16 December 2014and a liquidator on 30 January 2015.

Shan added, ‘The expropriation of SARL’s investment is the subject of an ongoing dispute between SARL and the Kingdom of Swaziland under the Swaziland Investment Promotion Act (1998) and the Southern African Development Community Protocol on Finance and Investment (2006).’

Shan added, ‘I caused SG Commodities to make payments to Metropolitan [the art dealer] because HMK, through Mr Sihle, demanded that I do so. I understood that demand to come with an implied threat that, if HMK’s demand was not met, the Ngwenya iron ore mine project would be placed in jeopardy. SG Commodities therefore also seeks restitution of those monies by reason of economic duress applied by HMK.’

King Mswati III is one of two respondents in the case. The other is Inchatsavane Company (Proprietary) Limited. King Mswati is described as the sole shareholder in this company.

The case is to be heard in the BVI because that is where SG Commodities is incorporated.

See also
HOW SWAZI KING DESTROYED IRON MINE
MYSTERY OF SWAZI KING’S 10m LOAN
KING AT CENTRE OF IRON MINE FAILURE
 
ONLY KING GAINS FROM MINE FAILURE