Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts

Friday, 9 September 2022

Swaziland Newsletter No. 743 – 9 September 2022

 

Swaziland Newsletter No. 743 – 9 September 2022

News from and about Swaziland, compiled by Global Aktion, Denmark (www.globalaktion.dk) in collaboration with Swazi Media Commentary (www.swazimedia.blogspot.com), and sent to all with an interest in Swaziland - free of charge.

 

9/11’s anti-human rights legacy in eSwatini

By Kgalalelo Gaebee and David Kode, Vanguard Africa Foundation, 8 September 2022

SOURCE

 

Twenty-one years on, the legacy of the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 still reverberate. This year’s anniversary offers an opportunity to reflect on the unfortunate legacy in the proliferation of anti-terrorism laws. These laws have been used by numerous states, including many in Africa, to target dissent and limit the freedoms of expression, assembly and association. Between 2001 and 2018, African states were among over 140 countries worldwide that passed such counter-terrorism laws and other security-related legislation.

While the global counter-terrorism framework is clear about the fact that any strategy to combat terrorism must be based on respect for the rule of law, many countries in Africa, including those without a history of terrorist threats, now use anti-terrorism and related ‘security’ laws to silence critics. Eswatini is among the worst offenders.

Just a few months ago, the Kingdom of Eswatini, a nation subject to no threats from terrorism, used its Suppression of Terrorism Act (STA) to target people  raising legitimate concerns over actions of the government, which remains under absolute monarchical control. This time the target was journalist Zweli Martin Dlamini and his Swaziland News outlet. Backed by Eswatini’s Attorney General who designated Zweli as a ‘threat to national security,’ Prime Minister Cleopas Dlamini officially declared the journalist and the paper as entities that ‘knowingly facilitate’ the commission of terrorist acts.  

Zweli Martin Dlamini’s story mirrors those of several journalists and human rights defenders who report on the actions of King Mswati III and the government of Eswatini. He was forced to flee the kingdom for South Africa in February 2020 after being arbitrarily arrested and interrogated on suspicion of sedition after publishing two articles that were critical of Mswati and the monarchy. 

With a severely limited number of independent news outlets in Eswatini, the Swaziland News website is a major source of independent news. The Eswatini authorities have even approached South African courts with a request to interdict Swaziland News and force it to send drafts of any article about the King, the government or the royal family for vetting before they are published. 

The case of Zweli Dlamini is eerily similar to that of other human rights defenders, activists and journalists in many African countries – such as Algeria, Burundi and Cameroon, for example – those who have been arrested and charged using security-related legislation since the 11 September attacks. 

The context in which human rights defenders are charged using security-related laws is similar across the continent. Usually this happens when there are pro-democracy protests and calls for democratic reforms – including during election campaigns, when there are unconstitutional changes of government, or when activists are critical of state actions. Authorities know that when the rationale of security and anti-terrorism is activated, constitutional protections are thereby lowered. Authorities are also aware that invoking security-related laws elicits sympathy and collaboration from other states.

In Eswatini, the STA was promulgated partly as a response to growing calls from political groups to be formally recognised and allowed to duly register and participate fully in political activities, including elections. The law was immediately used by royal authorities to designate the main opposition party, the People’s United Democratic Movement (PUDEMO) and three other organisations, as ‘terrorist groups.’

In July 2021, pro-democracy activists Mduduzi Bacede Mabuza and Mthandeni Dube were arrested and charged under the STA as pro-democracy protests spread across the country.  As it stands today, they have now been in custody for over one year.  

In Eswatini, the STA has been routinely used to target civic organisations, journalists and activists for offences such as wearing t-shirts bearing the logos of political groups or shouting slogans and making speeches at public gatherings - harmless acts of free speech that in no way constitute terrorism.

To read more of this article, click here

https://www.vanguardafrica.com/africawatch/2022/9/7/911s-anti-human-rights-legacy-in-eswatini



King Mswati accused of delaying eSwatini national dialogue

By Peter Fabricius, Daily Maverick (South Africa), 4 September 2022

SOURCE

 

It’s been almost a year since Swazi King Mswati III met President Cyril Ramaphosa in Eswatini and agreed to launch a national dialogue to address the kingdom’s growing political crisis.

Several regional summits and fact-finding missions later, amid growing tensions in the country, no dialogue has begun. And last month the Southern African Development Community (SADC) decided to convene yet another summit and send yet another fact-finding mission to the country, adding further to the delay.

Eswatini’s political opposition, under the umbrella of The Multistakeholders Forum (MSF) has mildly rebuked SADC leaders for “reinventing the wheel” by agreeing to the new summit and fact-finding mission. It has accused Mswati of dragging his feet and has warned SADC leaders not to be hoodwinked by the king into believing the crisis in Eswatini is a security rather than a democracy issue. They insist that the growing insecurity in the country is the result of Mswati denying democracy.

SA lawyer expelled

The Swazi government is in the meantime showing no signs of creating an environment for dialogue by allowing more democratic space. Last week, on the contrary, it expelled South African lawyer Sicelo Mngomezulu who is representing two jailed, pro-democracy members of Parliament, Bacede Mabuza and Mthandeni Dube.

Government spokesperson Mlandvo Dlamini said in a statement that this was because Mngomezulu had called on Swazi maidens not to attend the annual traditional Reed Dance to be held on 5 September. The government said it was against the national interest as it had contradicted a call by the country’s authorities. Mngomezulu had therefore violated the Public Order Act.

The Reed Dance has become a political issue this year, probably because it is strongly supported by the Palace as part of the country’s traditional culture. But critics say it demeans the young women for the prurient pleasure of men.

Mngomezulu denied calling on the maidens to boycott the Reed Dance and said the government’s real reason for effectively banning him was that he had publicly supported the two MPs in calling for democratic reforms in Eswatini.

The two MPs — and a third, Mduduzi Simelane, who fled Eswatini before he could be arrested — last year allowed their constituents to petition them with grievances, including a call for the country’s prime minister and executive to be elected by Parliament and not appointed by the king.

When the government banned these petitions, it sparked protests which spiralled into rioting in June 2021, widespread destruction and the deaths of scores of people, mostly protesters shot by security forces. The government accused the MPs of inciting the violence.

It was this violence which prompted SADC to address the crisis and send three fact-finding missions to the country. In early November 2021 Ramaphosa — then heading SADC’s security organ — visited Eswatini and met Mswati who agreed to convene a national dialogue to plot a way out of the crisis.

But this has stalled. Part of the reason has been that Mswati and the political opposition have widely divergent views on how the dialogue should unfold. Mswati and his ministers have made it clear that they want it to be framed entirely as “Sibaya” which is a traditional consultation — enshrined in Eswatini’s constitution — which the king occasionally holds with his people.

But the MSF and others have rejected Sibaya, saying it is not a dialogue but a monologue, entirely managed by the palace where the king talks down to his subjects and does not elicit their views. Instead, the MSF wants a genuine negotiating forum managed by a neutral entity and including all stakeholders, as well as opposition political parties which are now banned. Though Ramaphosa agreed at his November meeting with Mswati that Sibaya could be part of the process, SADC also made it clear later that the dialogue should be much more representative — and include political parties now banned. This was clear from a draft framework for a multistakeholder national dialogue that SADC wrote in February.

The framework also set out a timetable for the national dialogue, to begin in April. But not even preparatory discussions about establishing it have begun. After that, Mswati missed two SADC summits to discuss how to kickstart the dialogue.

Eventually, he attended the ordinary annual SADC summit on 22 August in Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) where Eswatini was discussed, but where the national dialogue was kicked down the road again.

The communique from the summit said the Eswatini government had presented a report on the security situation in the country. The leaders had condemned the violence, but had also ordered an extraordinary summit of SADC’s security organ to be held, “aimed at finding a peaceful and lasting solution to the security challenges facing the country.”

Ramaphosa, the outgoing chairperson of the SADC security organ, said afterwards that “SADC is now going to take this firmly in hand”, by setting up a fact-finding mission and sending SADC’s new Panel of Elders, headed by former Tanzanian president Jakaya Kikwete, “to go and find effective ways of dealing with the situation…” 

On his return from the summit, Mswati addressed the nation to explain that the SADC organ summit with his government would be held in Eswatini “to address issues affecting peace and security.”

This meant that the next move would be this summit and not the national dialogue, he added, significantly. He said the other SADC leaders had been surprised by the continued violence in Eswatini, which he had reported to them.

Democratic governance

The MSF issued a statement last week that said Mswati “should stop misleading his peers in SADC” that the problem in Eswatini was only a security issue. 

“The issue affecting the nation is more than just a security concern; it is fundamentally a political question. The security issue arises from the political problem, which is the lack of and absence of democratic governance in the country. The security issue can and will never be resolved without addressing the political question.

“The security instability is but a symptom of a sickness of our politics. SADC cannot resolve the Swaziland crisis by addressing symptoms and not the crux of the crisis.”

The MSF politely welcomed SADC’s decision “to send yet another fact-finding mission of the Elders” and to hold another summit on Eswatini. But it said that “we will impress on the SADC not to reinvent the wheel. The process has to proceed along the lines set out in the ‘Draft framework for inclusive multistakeholder national dialogue in the Kingdom of Eswatini’ which SADC had already drafted in February”. 

This was a good foundation for the national dialogue to start. “The delay has no justification; except that the King is buying time to delay the inevitable.” 

 

Escalating eSwatini crisis triggers diplomatic tension: Mswati blasts President Ramaphosa for announcing Panel of Elders.

By Zweli Martin Dlamini, Swaziland News, 7 September, 2022

SOURCE

 

MBABANE: Eswatini King through his Private Secretary Sihle Dlamini came hard on South African President Cyril Matamela Ramaphosa for announcing that the Southern African Development Community (SADC) has appointed a Panel of Elders to try and resolve the political crisis in the troubled Kingdom.

Dlamini, who was allegedly acting on behalf of King Mswati created a Facebook Page where he blasted the South African President for announcing the appointment of a Panel of Elders, however, the King’s Private Secretary was very careful by avoiding to mention the name of the Head of State.

“A Head of State uttered outright lies saying there’s a Panel of Elders that has been appointed, there’s nothing like that,” said the King’s Private Secretary.

But royal insiders told this Swaziland News that King Mswati ordered his Private Secretary to counter the information or narrative by the media suggesting that a Panel of Elders would visit the Kingdom of eSwatini.

“The King is very angry with President Cyril Ramaphosa, he believes he is out to remove him from power. You must understand that diplomacy doesn’t allow the King to publicly attack another Head of State so he sent his Private Secretary to correct this narrative,” said the royal insider.

Mswati refused to attend SADC Troika Summits while President Ramaphosa was still the Chairman after the South African President stated clearly, when addressing the media that he advised the King to participate in a political dialogue with all stakeholders.

The sentiments by King Mswati’s Secretary were supported by Government Spokesperson Alpheous Nxumalo when speaking to the South African Broadcasting Cooperation (SABC) on Tuesday, Nxumalo expressed disappointment that a Head of State decided to leave a SADC meeting while it was in progress, convene a press conference and announced the appointment of a Panel of Elders.

“It is very unfortunate that one particular and single leader of the SADC States who stood-up to make a presentation and a submission in the meeting, decided to leave the meeting before it close and convened a press conference and disseminate misinformation and disinformation. Every meeting of SADC as Heads of State, the resolutions are reflected only, in one document,” said the Government Spokesperson when speaking to the SABC on Tuesday.

The eSwatini Government Spokesperson subsequently ‘attacked’ SABC International Editor live on air accusing her of being ‘creative’ when dealing with eSwatini political issues.

President Ramaphosa is the only Head of State who announced that SADC has appointed a Panel of Elders when addressing journalists during the SADC Summit in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

“SADC is going to take this firmly in hand, setup a fact-finding mission and send a panel of elders to go and find effective ways of dealing with the situation,” said President Cyril Ramaphosa, the out-going SADC Troika Chairperson when addressing journalists during the SADC Summit held in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

 

Alarming number of pupils treated for STIs during lockdown

By Nomthandazo Nkambule, eSwatini Observer, 7 September 2022

SOURCE

 

While the world was grappling with COVID-19 especially in 2020/21, it has since surfaced that the number of school going children that were treated for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) during the lockdown in the country was alarming.

Not only that, about 1 760 learners in Grade VII, Form III and Form V got pregnant during the lockdown.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) HIV and Health Education Eswatini National Programme Officer Dr Bethusile Mahlalela said COVID-19 exposed lots of challenges, especially those pertaining to young people.

She revealed that some learners were abused at family setting, adding that a number of issues emerged since the outbreak of COVID-19, including mental and health issues, while some learners had their parents dying and many other challenges. Dr Mahlalela said the abuse amongst school going children occurred despite efforts to curb teenage pregnancies which in turn results to pupils dropping out of school. She said UNESCO and its partners collaborated to ascertain what causes early pregnancy amongst children.

She said in June, 2018, UNESCO launched the EUP campaign in Eastern and Southern Africa (ESA) during the Southern African Development Community (SADC) ministers of education meeting in Durban, South Africa.

She said the launch of the campaign was part of the ESA ministerial commitment, which was endorsed in December 2013 by ministers of education and health in the ESA region. The commitment has prompted significant progress by member states to address the needs of adolescents and young people with respect to ensuring access to life skills-based HIV and sexuality education and youth-friendly SRH services.

One of the targets of the ESA commitment was to reduce EUP by 75 per cent by the year 2020. In the 2017 Technical Coordination Group (TCG) meeting of the ESA commitment, countries agreed to focus on the issue of EUP as an area requiring intervention across all countries and there was a clear recommendation to launch a regional EUP campaign. Following this recommendation, UNESCO commissioned a situation analysis on EUP in 10 countries in ESA to assess the magnitude of the problem in the region. The study revealed that EUP in ESA is very high with at least 15 per cent of 15 to 19-year-olds ever having been pregnant.

To read more of this report, click here

http://new.observer.org.sz/details.php?id=18801

 

Suppression of students’ voices continues in Swaziland as police crush peaceful protest

By Lwazi Maseko, Communist Party of Swaziland, 8 September 2022

SOURCE

MBABANE:  On Wednesday 7 September 2022, an armed police battalion violently crushed a peaceful protest action by students from the Limkokwing University of Creative Technology (LUCT) in the capital city, Mbabane.

The police had camped at the university premises following the students’ resolution to protest over various demands, including the demands for face-to-face learning and disbursement of students’ allowances as part of the right to free education campaign.

Mswati, who rules Swaziland as an absolute monarch, in his desperation to cling to power, has vowed to violently crush all protests in the country.

A student at LUCT, Buhle Dlamini, said, "We found armed police officers around the university as early as around 8am. The private security guards, together with the armed police officers, closed the university’s main gate. They locked out those who wanted to enter, while locking in those who wanted to leave the university premises.”

Students on both sides of the gate demanded that the police open the gate.

“We waited impatiently by the gate until one police officer started issuing threats and arrogantly commanded that we leave the school gate immediately," continued Buhle.

After a few minutes, another group of armed police officers arrived to back up the first group who were already shivering in fear of the students’ anger.

Police then started firing teargas towards students at the gate and those inside campus.

The police then targeted six members of the Communist Party of Swaziland (CPS) who were on their way back to their respective houses, accusing them of instigating the students’ protest.

The police thereafter apprehended two CPS members and detained them at the Mbabane Police Station, releasing them at around 4:30 pm after intense interrogation.

CPS Member Mhlojobe Mtsetfwa who was part of the detained comrades said, "The police held us, assaulted us with batons and with the buts of their guns. We thus sustained injuries due to the police brutality.”

The police later released them without charge.

Among the students’ demands was the call for the lifting of suspension for students who had been dragged through the university’s one-sided disciplinary process.

The students also demanded the appointment of a new director for the university. On this demand, one student who preferred to remain anonymous said, “Tfobile Gumedze, the current Director, has failed dismally, and she does not place the interests of the students as her top priority.”

Students have also complained about the inadequate security in the university campus. They thus demand the change of the private security company that is enjoying the tender to secure their campus.

Despite the attack by the police, the students remain upbeat about the struggle for freedom in Swaziland and have vowed to continue organising themselves and inspiring the nation in that regard.

The “Democracy Now” campaign, first launched by the CPS in 2019, continues to gain ground across the country as the people have become resolute in the demand for total freedom.

 

eSwatini: Internet disruptions occurring nationwide as of Sept. 7

By Crisis 24

SOURCE

 

Reports indicate that internet disruptions are occurring across the country, as of early September 7. The reasons for the outage remain unclear, as well as how long it may last.

Business disruptions are possible for companies that use internet services for their operations. Locals in parts of eSwatini may stage demonstrations to oppose the internet disruptions, especially if the outage is deemed to be a result of purposeful government action. Heightened security measures and localized transport disruptions are likely nearby any rallies.

 

No independence / pro-democracy women establish their organisation

By Simanga Nxumalo, Swati Newsweek, 6 September, 2022

SOURCE

MANZINI: As the royal regime celebrates independence, Eswatini Pro-democracy women had established a new Women Organisation in an effort to support the struggle for multiparty democracy in Swaziland.

The new organisation consists of different members from the different political parties.

Candy Dlamini, the Communications Officer confirmed the matter.

“Thank you for the opportunity to give a brief about our new Organisation.

Dlamini said, “The name of our Organisation is Progressive Women’s Alliance of SWAZILAND (PWAS).

“This organisation is formed by progressive women in the struggle. Having participated in the country's struggle activities, we realised that women are part of the struggle yet they are not seen nor heard. We then decided to come together to form an organisation that will incorporate women in the struggle locally and beyond our borders as we still have Swazi women that are actively involved in the struggle.

“Currently we have representatives from the following Organisations

NNLC

EFFSWA

SPLM

UED

SIVESIYINCABA

SWALIMO

SWADEPA .

“Today we had our meeting where we elected an Interim Task Team that will be in office for 6 months, their Duty is to facilitate the drafting of our Constitution, by laws, terms of reference before electing our executive.

From today's elections, the portfolios stand as follows (we elected parties not individuals)

Chairperson. SPLM

Vice chair. NNLC

Sec General. SWALIMO

DSG. Sivesiyincaba

International Affairs. UED

Organiser. SWADEPA

Spokesperson / Communication. EFFSWA.

She concluded, “The President of SNAT was our Electoral officer for the day.”

 

SWAZI MEDIA COMMENTARY

Find us:

Blog: www.swazimedia.blogspot.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/142383985790674

Twitter: @Swazimedia

 

Wednesday, 18 November 2020

Swaziland Govt. wants law to make it illegal to send social media posts that cause ‘emotional distress’

The Swaziland (eSwatini) Government wants to introduce a law making it illegal to post material online that would deliberately cause a victim serious emotional distress.

The Harmful Digital Communications Bill intends to deter, prevent and mitigate harm caused to individuals by harmful digital communications and provide victims of harmful digital communications with a quick and efficient means of redress.

On conviction, offenders face a minimum fine of E500,000 (US$27,000) and a maximum fine of E5 million or a jail sentence of up to seven years. 

A ‘victim’ is the person who is the target of a posted digital communication.

The Harmful Digital Communications Bill, 2020 has been prepared by the Swazi  Ministry of Information, Communication and Technology. This is the same ministry that last week withdrew the Computer Crime and Cybercrime Bill, 2020 that could have sent people who published ‘fake news’ to jail for 10 years. It is expected it will be re-presented after consultations have been completed.

The proposed law would impact on social media sites including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and WhatsApp.

Human Rights Commissioner Sabelo Masuku told the Times Sunday newspaper (15 November 2020) in Swaziland the new Bill was no different from the withdrawn Computer Crime and Cybercrime Bill.

 

See also

Swaziland Govt. withdraws controversial Computer Crime Bill, seeks more discussion

https://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2020/11/swaziland-govt-withdraws-controversial.html

Sunday, 15 November 2020

Swaziland Govt. withdraws controversial Computer Crime Bill, seeks more discussion

A Bill that set out to impose 10 years’ jail time on people publishing ‘fake news’ has been withdrawn by the Swaziland (eSwatini) Government after protests in the House of Assembly.

The Computer Crime and Cybercrime Bill, 2020 introduced a wide range of offences including spamming and cyberstalking. Cyberstalking included making false accusations, defamation and identity theft.

The most controversial section of the Bill set out to make it unlawful for any person to publish any statement or fake news through any medium, including social media, with the intention to deceive any other person or group of persons. On conviction a person would be liable to a fine not exceeding E10 million (US$600,000) or imprisonment not exceeding 10 years or both.

The House of Assembly Ministry of Information, Communication and Technology Portfolio Committee rejected the section on ‘fake news’ at a meeting last week and days later committee chair Macford Sibandze told the House the Bill would be taken back for further consultations.

Among criticisms made were the large fines and lengthy prison sentences that would be imposed.

King Mswati who rules Swaziland as an absolute monarch has been widely criticised by human rights groups. He controls much of the mainstream media in Swaziland. Nearly all broadcasting is state-controlled and one of the only two daily newspapers in the kingdom is in effect owned by the King. Formal censorship and self-censorship by journalists when reporting matters about the King is almost total.

In recent years news websites that call for human rights reforms in Swaziland have been launched. The editors of two of them are in exile in neighbouring South Africa after publishing articles deemed critical of the King. They face sedition charges if they return to Swaziland. There are also a number of Facebook sites and other social media platforms that carry material critical of the King.

See also

Swaziland rethinks law on ‘fake news’ that could lead to 10 years’ jail time

https://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2020/11/swaziland-rethinks-law-on-fake-news.html

 

Swaziland proposes law with 10 year jail term for publishing ‘fake news’ https://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2020/08/swaziland-introduces-law-with-10-year.html

Monday, 9 November 2020

Swaziland rethinks law on ‘fake news’ that could lead to 10 years’ jail time

A committee of members of the Swaziland (eSwatini) parliament have voted to amend a Bill that could impose a E10 million fine or 10 years’ jail time on people publishing ‘fake news’.

The section of the Computer Crime and Cybercrime Bill, 2020 on ‘fake news’ was removed by the Ministry of Information and Technology Portfolio Committee, its chair Macford Sibandze told the news website Swati Newsweek.

The Bill set out to make it unlawful for any person to publish any statement or fake news through any medium, including social media, with the intention to deceive any other person or group of persons. On conviction a person would be liable to a fine not exceeding E10 million (US$600,000) or imprisonment not exceeding 10 years or both.

The new law would allow the courts to prosecute in some circumstances Swazi nationals who live outside of Swaziland. It also covers a wide range of offences including spamming and cyberstalking. Cyberstalking includes making false accusations, defamation and identity theft.

Sibandze told Swati Newsweek, ‘A section on fake news was completely removed. Fines were cut by 50 to 75 percent, whilst others up to 90 percent.’

Swaziland has a poor human rights record and media are severely restricted by more than 30 laws. The Computer Crime and Cybercrime Bill which was announced in August 2020 was widely criticised by human rights campaigners.

The Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC) in a 14-page response to the new Bill said the definition of ‘fake news’ and the offence itself was not included in a Southern African Development Community (SADC) model law that covered these areas.

It added, ‘The offence of fake news is highly subjective and overly broad and ought to be qualified further or repealed altogether. Intentionally deceiving only one person ought never to be an offence under this section, and if the deceit was for a purpose of fraud, for example, that would be the appropriate offence to charge a person with.’

It said, ‘The offences of cybersex or sexual grooming with a child, cyberbullying, cyber stalking, harassment, and trafficking in humans, all attach a penalty of up to E10m fine or 10 years’ imprisonment or both. Fake news and violation of intellectual property rights, which do less harm to the individual attach the same penalties of E10m or 10 years’ imprisonment,’ it added.

 

See also

Swaziland proposes law with 10 year jail term for publishing ‘fake news’

https://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2020/08/swaziland-introduces-law-with-10-year.html

 

Swaziland journalist critical of King flees, hides in forest five days https://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2020/05/swaziland-journalist-critical-of-king.html

 

‘No media freedom’ in Swaziland, Reporters Without Borders annual report states https://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2020/04/no-media-freedom-in-swaziland-reporters.html

 

Swaziland journalist ‘tortured by police after criticising absolute monarch in newspaper articles’ https://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2020/03/swaziland-journalist-tortured-by-police.html

Monday, 31 August 2020

Swaziland proposes law with 10 year jail term for publishing ‘fake news’


The government in the absolute monarchy of Swaziland (eSwatini) has introduced a law aimed at censoring all forms of media which could lead to a 10-year jail sentence for people publishing ‘fake news’.

The kingdom ruled by King Mswati III as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch already has been labelled ‘not free’ by human rights groups.

A government gazette has been published detailing the proposed law. The bill will be piloted by the Ministry of Information, Communication and Technology which is headed by the King’s daughter, Princess Sikhanyiso.

The Times of eSwatini reported that the bill states that any person who publishes any statement or fake news through any medium, including social media, with the intention to deceive any other person or group of persons commits an offence. On conviction a person would be liable to a fine not exceeding E10 million (US$600,000) or imprisonment not exceeding 10 years or both.

The new law would allow the courts to prosecute in some circumstances Swazi nationals who live outside of Swaziland. It also covers a wide range of offences including spamming and cyberstalking. Cyberstalking includes making false accusations, defamation and identity theft.

King Mswati who has been widely criticised by human rights groups controls much of the mainstream media in Swaziland. Nearly all broadcasting is state-controlled and one of the only two daily newspapers in the kingdom is in effect owned by the King. Formal censorship and self-censorship by journalists when reporting matters about the King is almost total.

In recent years news websites that call for human rights reforms in Swaziland have been launched. The editors of two of them are in exile in neighbouring South Africa after publishing articles deemed critical of the King. They face sedition charges if they return to Swaziland. There are also a number of Facebook sites and other social media platforms that carry material critical of the King.

Reporters Without Borders in its World Press Index released earlier in 2020 reported that there was no media freedom in Swaziland. It reported, ‘No court is allowed to prosecute or try members of the government, but any criticism of the regime is liable to be the subject of a prosecution. Far from being an independent protector of rights and freedoms, the judicial system is often used to undermine journalism.’

Freedom House scored Swaziland 16 out of a possible 100 points in its Freedom in the World 2019 report. It concluded that Swaziland was ‘not free’.

Freedom House stated, ‘The King exercises ultimate authority over all branches of the national government and effectively controls local governance through his influence over traditional chiefs. Political dissent and civic and labor activism are subject to harsh punishment under sedition and other laws. Additional human rights problems include impunity for security forces and discrimination against women and LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) people.’

In Swaziland political parties are barred from taking part in elections. Groups advocating for democracy are outlawed under the Suppression of Terrorism Act.



See also

Swaziland journalist critical of King flees, hides in forest five days

Swaziland journalist critical of absolute monarch, beaten, arrested, faces treason charge

‘No media freedom’ in Swaziland, Reporters Without Borders annual report states
Swaziland journalist ‘tortured by police after criticising absolute monarch in newspaper articles’
https://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2020/03/swaziland-journalist-tortured-by-police.html

Newspaper editor flees Swaziland for second time after arrest and police torture
Swaziland democracy leader charged with sedition for criticising absolute monarch on news website