Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Law Society of Swaziland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Law Society of Swaziland. Show all posts

Friday, 18 August 2023

Swaziland Newsletter No. 790 – 18 August 2023

 

Swaziland Newsletter No. 790 – 18 August 2023

News from and about Swaziland, compiled by Global Aktion, Denmark (www.globalaktion.dk) in collaboration with Swazi Media Commentary (www.swazimedia.blogspot.com), and sent to all with an interest in Swaziland - free of charge.

 

Corruption within the judiciary escalating at a very alarming rate, Judges taking bribes

Opinion by Zweli Martin Dlamini, Swaziland News, 12 August 2023

SOURCE

 The Law Society of Swaziland (LSS) must consider establishing a Commission to investigate allegations of corruption involving some Judges.

This week I was chatting to a very senior court official and by co-incidence, he/she(to protect identity) spoke about a Judge who received four hundred thousand Rands(R400,000.00) as a bribe, the intention was to influence a judgement.

The court official said she/he won’t give me the name for now but confirmed that some Judges are taking bribes these days due to financial challenges.

But with this information, I will conduct my own investigations and will definitely uncover the identity of the alleged corrupt Judge.

It is becoming extremely difficult to access justice in eSwatini, the corruption starts from the office of the Attorney General (AG) Sifiso Khumalo and networked to the Judges.

I asked the court official what happened if the aggrieved party in the matter appeals to the Supreme Court against the bias judgement and the court official said;

“The person who bribed the Judge of the High Court will also bribe the Supreme Court Judges to confirm the judgement otherwise, the judgement will be overturned. Some cases involve millions so it’s not difficult for those who want judgements to be delivered in their favour to bribe Judges”.

Worth-noting, lawyers spend time researching and preparing for cases only for justice to be sold.

The late lawyer Mandla Mkhwanazi who assisted me to win an unfair dismissal case at the Industrial Court, once highlighted that justice was for sale within the judiciary, Chief Justice Bheki Maphalala challenged him to provide evidence.

Well, as the head of judiciary, the Chief Justice was supposed to establish a Commission to investigate the allegations, these allegations came from Mkhwanazi, the then Secretary General (SG) from the Law Society of Swaziland(LSS) and therefore, it was a concern from the organization and/or the entire legal fraternity.

One of the reasons why the Chief Justice demonstrated reluctance to investigate the allegations was the fact that, he is corrupt to the core.

The concerns with regards to the ongoing corruption within the judiciary must addressed as a matter of urgency and the removal of the Chief Justice should be taken into consideration.

Even the calls for democracy are meaningless if we disregard what is happening within the courts, the judiciary is the cornerstone of democracy, it administers the rule of law.

Indeed, in a democratic dispensation, the law rules and this means, we have an obligation to work collectively to restore the rule of law and/or mitigate corruption within the justice system.

It should be noted that if we continue to disregard, ignore and/or allow such critical arm of the State to be paralyzed by corruption, disorder will erupt and subsequently manifest into anarchy.

The judiciary is a very important and critical arm of the State, any breakdown in the administration of justice does not only undermine public order but, threatens social and economic development including investor confidence.

Even the highly anticipated political dialogue must be conducted within the confines of the law and in this regard, the independence of the judiciary is of paramount importance.

 

We are being bullied into sex work

By Thokozani Mazibuko, eSwatini News, 12 August 2023

SOURCE

MATSAPHA: Some women working in Matsapha and surrounding areas, have alleged that they are being forced into sex work.

Matsapha is the hub of activity in Eswatini, where most textile firms and industries are geographically located. With the demand of cheaper and affordable accommodation, some people have invested in property business to meet that demand; however, some women have alleged that it was no longer safe for them to rent the so called cheaper accommodation in some locations around Matsapa. Eswatini News spoke to some textile workers, who  preferred to remain anonymous. They disclosed that they were no longer staying in Matsapha after they were allegedly threatened with assault by a group of women.

“I was on my way back from work one evening when I was approached by a group of women who told me to join them when they go out at night for sex work. I told them that I was not interested but one of them threatened to deal with me because I thought I was better than them. I immediately looked for alternative accommodation at Ngwane Park just to escape from them as I realised that they meant what they said,” narrated one of the textile workers.

Meanwhile, another textile worker revealed that many girls and women had been involuntarily forced to join the group of sex workers in Matsapha.

“Many of my colleagues are already sex workers as they have been bullied by these women into joining them. If they refused to join them, some of them had their houses mysteriously broken into,” she further alleged. Another sex worker, who agreed to speak to Eswatini News on condition of anonymity, said that it was true that some of them were bullied into joining the team of sex workers.

“I was new in Matsapha and fresh from school when I arrived to seek employment at one of the textile companies. Immediately when I found a job, I was approached by a group of women who issued a lot of threats in the event I refused to join them after hours. Today  I am a sex worker by night and a textile worker by day,” revealed the woman. It has been reliably gathered that some alleged sex workers are already advertising their services in other locations in Matsapha. Eswatini News happened to come across some papers with contacts and the list of service which, however, cannot be repeated, along the streets of Matsapha.

 

Accepting imali yekuta, disappearing is criminal - police

By Mbono Mdluli, eSwatini Observer, 15 August 2023

SOURCE 

Police have warned women that it is a criminal offence to accept transport money from a man and end up not seeing him.

According to the police, the woman’s freedom may as a result of this be at the mercy of that man.

This was shared by Sindi Ndlovu, a Crime Prevention Officer within the Royal Eswatini Police Service (REPS) on Saturday during a crime prevention event organised by the Big-Bend police, in conjunction with Stefanutti Stocks.

Ndlovu said such culprits needed to be brought to book.

“There are these ladies who convince men to provide them with money for transport so that they can be able to see them and end up not honouring that promise.

That is a criminal offence and I encourage men to approach the nearest police station so that these women can be brought to book,” she said.
Her message was met with amusement from the over 200 men and women who had attended the event.

The subject generated interest, especially from the men. Some were heard saying they had many women to report to the police station for such an offence.
Some admitted that they did not know that such an act was criminal.

They were further educated by the police that such an act was theft by false pretences.
Ndlovu further encouraged men who were victims of abuse from their wives to report them to the nearest police stations.

She said she was aware that some wives had a tendency of beating their husbands because they knew that men would feel embarrassed to report such matters to the police.

The crime prevention officer also stated that many women were abused by their husbands and such incidents had to be reported to alleviate crime in the country.

Ndlovu pleaded with men to know that a rod was not supposed to be used on their wives because that would not ensure the welfare of the residents of their homesteads.
She spoke of a special rod that was supposed to be used to beat women.

To read more of this report, click here

http://new.observer.org.sz/details.php?id=20958

 

No leave of absence for elections for civil servants

By Joseph Zulu, Times of eSwatini, 12 August 2023

SOURCE 

MBABANE: Caught between a rock and a hard place.

Civil servants have to decide between completely resigning from employment or continue working while pursuing their political dreams. In the past, as soon as nominees were chosen, civil servants would be allowed to take leave of absence after being nominated. This allowed them to have time to campaign for their political positions such as bucopho, indvuna yenkhundla or even Member of Parliament (MP).

This was the case in the previous general elections, including in 2018. This year, the country is to hold the much-anticipated national exercise again and in about two weeks, nominees will take part in the first phase of elections, known as primary elections. This will then be followed by secondary elections. Eswatini’s elections are different from how those of many countries, where individual candidates are selected based on parties they represent. However, constitutionally, Eswatini does not allow political parties during elections and candidates are elected based on individual merit, first at their chiefdom level. Unlike in the past, this time around, all civil servants have been ordered to be at work and are not allowed to take leave of absence. Under leave of absence, civil servants are not paid salaries but this time, the government has not stopped the salaries and instead ordered the civil servants to continue working.

This is contained in a memo dated July 28, 2023, issued by the Ministry of Public Service. Some civil servants have been left furious with these developments, while others are said not to be aware that they are not suppose to be away from work while campaigning for the political positions.

The Principal Secretary (PS) in the ministry, Sipho Tsabedze, confirmed the memo, pointing out that it applied to all civil servants. This was after he was contacted following concerns from civil servants, who expressed displeasure that they were not allowed to take leave of absence by the relevant authorities in the various work stations. Tsabedze said all the civil servants who had been nominated were affected by this memo. He said this was because they were still getting paid and for that reason needed to be at work.

The PS stated that civil servants who were nominated to stand in the 2023 General Elections were expected to be at work until they won the elections.

He said constitutionally, only politicians who were civil servants were allowed to take absence of leave. Tsabedze said for now, the nominees were not politicians and that if they were civil servants, they did not qualify for leave of absence until the time they won the elections and also made their oaths to serve. He said winning the elections was not just enough but that they should also make the required oath to serve.

“For now, they are like a woman who has not been smeared with red okra. Even if lobola is paid for one, she is not a wife until the red okra is smeared,” said Tsabedze. He also added that for now, the nominees were still ‘gambling’ as they could win, or may not do so. Tsabedze also revealed that even the outgoing politicians such as MPs, tindvuna tetinkhundla and bucopho were still getting paid. He said it would be unfair to say that civil servants, who wanted to stand for elections, should go on leave of absence and not get paid when the other outgoing politicians were still getting paid.

He revealed that the only time their salaries would be stopped was if they had won the elections and reached the stages where they made oath to serve the country. “For now, they are not politicians,” said Tsabedze adding that they were still ordinary civil servants. Some civil servants are of the view that this would work to their advantage. They said this was because some of them were able to apply for leave and still be able to earn their salaries.

“In the past, it meant that you had to lose your salary while campaigning,” one said. He also said it would give an equal advantage for others who did not have enough money for campaigning and relied purely on their salaries. Also, some of the police officers said they did not mind being at work because they knew that their duty called for them to work 24 hours a day. “We can be called at any time just like it was during the unrest,” said a police officer. It was also gathered that even the warders were called yesterday to be informed of the situation. This is according to some warders who were nominated for elections. The Public Relations Officer (PRO) for His Majesty’s Correctional Services (HMCS) could not be reached for comment.

See also

It’s now up to the voter (new polling laws passed)

http://www.times.co.sz/feature/141440-it%E2%80%99s-now-up-to-the-voter.html

Elections: some chiefs want self-exiled emaswati barred

http://www.times.co.sz/news/141477-elections-some-chiefs-want-self-exiled-emaswati-barred.html

Times journalists must guard against ‘insulting’ emaSwati who are experiencing pain in exile, Alec Lushaba landed in trouble

http://swazilandnews.co.za/fundza.php?nguyiphi=4960

 

LUCT lecturers challenge Christian faith, prayers

By Kwanele Dlamini, Times of eSwatini, 14 August 2023

SOURCE 

MBABANE: Unionised lecturers and support staff of Limkokwing University of Creative Technology (LUCT) have run to court to stop Christian prayers during their meetings.

They want the management of the institution not to impose the Christian faith on them. Through their union, the National Workers Union of Swaziland Higher Institutions (NAWUSHI), the unionised lecturers want the High Court to interdict the management of LUCT, or anyone acting on its behest, from directing them to pray during their weekly stand-up meetings. It was further their plea to the court that it should declare the conduct of the respondent (LUCT) of imposing the Christian religion and practices on them to be unlawful. In motivating their application, the applicants (union) argued that such practice was in violation of their constitutional right to freedom of religion.

They wondered why the management of the university allegedly imposed its prayers on people who were unequivocally opposed to it. They argued further that they made it clear that the prayers were unsolicited and unappreciated due to differences in religion. “One finds no other conclusion than to conclude that this is a blatant abuse of power and sheer disrespect to the workers’ constitutional right to freedom of religion and conscience,” submitted the union on behalf of the support staff and lecturers. Section 23 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Swaziland (Eswatini), under the protection of freedom of conscience or religion, provides that: ‘‘Except with the free consent of that person, a person shall not be hindered in the enjoyment of the freedom of conscience, and for the purposes of this section freedom of conscience includes freedom of thought and of religion, freedom to change religion or belief, and freedom of worship either alone or in community with others’’. Respondents in the matter are LUCT and its Head of Academics, Stella Hlezephi.

To read more of this report, click here.

http://www.times.co.sz/news/141458-luct-lecturers-challenge-christian-faith-prayers.html

 

Life in exile drains you in subtle, terrible ways not properly understood, even by its victims

By Pius Vilakati, Daily Maverick (South Africa). 14 August 2023

SOURCE

Pius Vilakati is a Central Committee Member of the Communist Party of Swaziland and is its Head of Research and Policy Development. He has been exiled in South Africa since 2010. He writes in his personal capacity.

One evening last July, I returned from the annual winter school of the Communist Party of Swaziland (CPS), sneaked into my room, dropped to the floor and, leaning against the door, let loose a flood of tears.

This went on for quite a while, longer than all the previous times I had broken down.

Any specific reason for this final meltdown? I don’t even know! That’s the petrifying part.

But, having spent 13 years exiled in South Africa, since 16 May 2010, I’ve learnt through personal experiences that when it comes to exile life, every day something will remind you that you’re living in a foreign country — and living horribly. Since then, I haven’t been able to go home as Swaziland remains hell for the majority of the people, and worse for democracy activists.

Since at least the 1980s, the Swazi regime has intensified its attacks on pro-democracy activists, forcing many into exile, arresting and torturing many, while killing others and destroying lives in its wake.

Political parties have been banned in Swaziland since 12 April 1973, when the monarch seized all executive, legislative and judicial powers to rule by decree. The sham 2005 constitution further entrenched the powers of the absolute monarchy, the last such institution in Africa.

This year has been particularly bad for the CPS, whose activists have been targeted by the regime due to the party’s campaign for a mass boycott of Mswati’s sham elections. In its campaign for the unbanning of all political parties and the holding of truly free and fair elections, the CPS has become Mswati’s prime target.

Like others before me, my student activism was viciously attacked by the regime. In 2010 I was president of the Student Representative Council at the University of Swaziland and a member of the Swaziland National Union of Students when we united all tertiary institutions in an unprecedented national march for free education.

Mswati’s police made their intentions clear when, in February 2010, they detained me together with about 20 other student activists and leaders for a whole day, tortured us and further threatened us with violence if we protested again.

But I wasn’t going to let Mswati and his police tell me to stop fighting for justice. To this day, it still shocks many, including me, that I had to escape the police’s clutches by jumping into a hearse as part of my escape journey to exile. The hearse was carrying the lifeless body of Sipho Jele, a member of the People’s United Democratic Movement (Pudemo), who had been allegedly murdered after being detained by the police for wearing a Pudemo T-shirt on Workers’ Day. I was one of the speakers at his memorial service and night vigil in Manzini.

I only found out later that the police had disrupted and stopped Sipho Jele’s funeral that Sunday morning. By then I was “safely” in South Africa. A few weeks later, four other activists joined me in exile.

But I clearly wasn’t ready for the tough life in exile that I’ve lived through for the past 13 years.

Exile isn’t a choice, it’s but one of the many heinous crimes committed by the oppressive regime. The vicissitudes of exile life always throw everything at you, at any time, without expectation. You might be very careful and anticipate things, but something, I dare say anything, from an unexpected angle will remind you and drag your soul into the darkest night.

Exile isn’t a holiday or a mere excursion. It’s traumatic. Refugee status does not guarantee you security.

To read more of this article, click here.

https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2023-08-14-life-in-exile-drains-you-in-subtle-terrible-ways-not-properly-understood-even-by-its-victims/#:~:text=Exile%20drains%20the%20life%20out,the%20United%20States%2C%20in%201965.

SWAZI MEDIA COMMENTARY

Find us:

Blog: www.swazimedia.blogspot.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/142383985790674

X (formerly Twitter): @Swazimedia

 

Wednesday, 14 August 2019

Spotlight on absence of rule of law in Swaziland

Bheki Maphalala, the Chief Justice of Swaziland / eSwatini, has accused a group he calls a ‘political elite’ of undermining the kingdom’s judges. He has not named these people but has called them traitors.

His remarks have drawn attention to the small undemocratic southern African kingdom which is ruled by King Mswati III as an absolute monarch. Political parties are banned from taking part in elections. No members of the 30-seat Senate are elected by the people and the King chooses 10 of the 69 members of the House of Assembly. The King also appoints the Chief Justice, top judges and senior civil servants.

Groups that advocate for multi-party democracy have been banned under the Suppression of Terrorism Act.

Human rights campaigners have been drawing attention to the absence of the rule of law in the kingdom for many years. Chief among these is the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) which has published a number of reports. The ICJ is composed of 60 eminent judges and lawyers from all regions of the world.

The rule of law is a principle in governance which means that all people – including those in authority – are subject to the law. Under this principle the law is supreme, setting out acceptable limits for behaviour and safeguarding against abuse of power.

In 2015 the ICJ stated the King stood in the way of the kingdom having independent judges. In a submission to the United Nation’s Human Rights Council’s Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review of Swaziland, it called for an overhaul of laws and regulations in Swaziland to take power away from the King.

The ICJ stated, ‘The judges’ appointment process continues to pose a threat to judicial independence and impartiality. The Constitution of Swaziland provides that the judges are appointed by the King after consultation with the Judicial Service Commission (JSC). 

‘The King has the ultimate and final say in respect of the appointments to the bench.’ 

The ICJ also noted that King Mswati was personally immune from the law. It stated that in 2011, ‘the then Chief Justice Ramodibedi issued a Practice Directive ordering the non-registration of lawsuits that challenge the King “directly or indirectly”, effectively barring access to justice in any case against corporations, companies, trust or any entities in which the King owns shares or has an interest.’

In a separate report in 2016 the ICJ said the kingdom’s constitution needed to be changed to bring it in line, ‘with regional and universal international law and standards, in particular on the separation of powers and respect for judicial independence’.

It added, ‘Swaziland’s constitution, while providing for judicial independence in principle, does not contain the necessary safeguards to guarantee it. Overall, the legislative and regulatory framework falls short of international law and standards, including African regional standards.’

In 2018 the ICJ stated laws in Swaziland had been used by the State as weapons against human rights defenders. ‘There is a growing perception that the law, in particular the law of sedition, defamation, public order and anti-terrorism is systematically used to target human rights defenders (HRDs) and legitimate pro-democracy campaigners.’

It stated, ‘As far back as 1990, the Sedition and Subversive Activities Act 1938 (SSA) and the King’s 1973 Proclamation to the Nation were used against HRDs and legitimate pro-democracy campaigners. Leaders of the pro-democracy banned political opposition, the Peoples’ United Democratic Movement, were charged and tried for high treason for having convened a meeting to discuss the political problems in the country,’ it stated in a report called Achieving Justice for Gross Human Rights Violations in Swaziland - Key Challenges.

It is not only the ICJ that has raised concerns. In January 2019 Law Society of Swaziland Secretary Thulani Maseko criticised then-recent appointments of judges in the kingdom saying there was no transparency in the choices and the Swazi Constitution was ignored.

Maseko said five appointments to the kingdom’s High Court and Industrial Court ‘undermined the integrity, independence and accountability of the judiciary’. He said the appointing process had to be fair, transparent and competitive in line with Section 173 (4) of the constitution which also states appointments should be made on the basis of suitable qualifications, competence and relevant experience.

He said, ‘If these appointments were done in an open, transparent and competitive way, it would be clear that some of the appointees would not [have] passed the standard of integrity required of the judicial office.’

He added the appointments put the judiciary and the entire justice system into disrepute and undermined the rule of law. 

Richard Rooney

See also

Swaziland Chief Justice says kingdom under siege by ‘treasonous’ political elites
https://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2019/08/swaziland-chief-justice-says-kingdom.html 

Renewed criticism that rule of law in Swaziland is ignored as new judges appointed
‘King blocks judges’ independence’

Wednesday, 30 January 2019

Renewed criticism that rule of law in Swaziland is ignored as new judges appointed

The Law Society of Swaziland Secretary Thulani Maseko has criticised recent appointments of judges in the kingdom saying there was no transparency in the choices and the Swazi Constitution was ignored.

This was not the first time Swaziland / eSwatini which is ruled by absolute monarch King Mswati III has been criticised for ignoring the rule of law.

Maseko said five recent appointments to the kingdom’s High Court and Industrial Court ‘undermined the integrity, independence and accountability of the judiciary’. He said the appointing process had to be fair, transparent and competitive in line with Section 173 (4) of the constitution which also states appointments should be made on the basis of suitable qualifications, competence and relevant experience.

He said, ‘If these appointments were done in an open, transparent and competitive way, it would be clear that some of the appointees would not [have] passed the standard of integrity required of the judicial office.’

He added the appointments put the judiciary and the entire justice system into disrepute and undermined the rule of law. 

The rule of law is a principle in governance which means that all people – including those in authority – are subject to the law. Under this principle the law is supreme, setting out acceptable limits for behaviour and safeguarding against abuse of power.

The independence of judges in Swaziland has been questioned for many years. In 2015, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) in a submission to a United Nations panel that was reviewing human rights in Swaziland called for an overhaul of laws and regulations in the kingdom to take power away from the King.

The ICJ which is composed of 60 eminent judges and lawyers from all regions of the world said,The judges’ appointment process continues to pose a threat to judicial independence and impartiality. The Constitution of Swaziland provides that the judges are appointed by the King after consultation with the Judicial Service Commission (JSC). 

‘The King has the ultimate and final say in respect of the appointments to the bench. 
‘Moreover, the composition of the JSC and the appointment of its members undermine confidence in the independent discharge of its mandate, including the consultative role in the appointment of judges. The JSC is chaired by the Chief Justice, and in addition comprises two legal practitioners, the Chairman of the Civil Service Commission and two other persons. All of these individuals are appointed by the King.’

The ICJ added, ‘In addition, some recent judicial appointments have given rise to concern about the lack of qualification of those appointed. Certain appointments have been publicly questioned by Swaziland’s legal practitioners and by the Law Society.’

The ICJ called for an overhaul of the legal system in Swaziland. ‘The authorities of Swaziland must immediately review the laws and regulations pertaining to the JSC with a view to bringing them in line with regional and international law and standards, including by removing the Crown’s [the King’s] control over the JSC’s composition,’ it said.

In a separate report in 2016 the ICJ said the kingdom’s constitution needed to be changed to bring it in line ‘with regional and universal international law and standards, in particular on the separation of powers and respect for judicial independence’.

It added, ‘Swaziland’s constitution, while providing for judicial independence in principle, does not contain the necessary safeguards to guarantee it. Overall, the legislative and regulatory framework falls short of international law and standards, including African regional standards.’

In 2014 Caroline James of the Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC) wrote the judiciary under the then Chief Justice MichaelRamodibedi had ‘become a puppet of King Mswati III, and the courts, which are supposed to hold the other branches of government to account, instead further his interests and protect his actions.

‘In 2011 the Chief Justice issued an official practice directive that no courts could entertain any legal suits filed against the King and his office. This directive shields the King from constitutional challenges brought against him as head of government, as well as actions brought against him in his personal capacity. This allows him to act with impunity, and completely removed any mechanism for accountability.

‘Later that year, one of the few independent thinking judges on the High Court bench, Judge Thomas Masuku, was impeached and removed from his position. Without Masuku the number of judges willing to apply the law impartially has been reduced, and as the Chief Justice himself allocates all cases before the High Court, he is able to ensure that any politically sensitive matters are given to judges he knows will rule in the government’s favour.’

She said the judiciary was being used to punish those who dared to speak out.

‘The offence of contempt of court exists to protect the integrity of the judiciary and prevent interference with justice, and not to prevent legitimate criticism of judges and their conduct. However, the range of conduct covered by the offence appears to have been widened, and is being used in Swaziland to shield judges from criticism. This broad interpretation has removed any certainty individuals may have over what they may or may not say about the judiciary.’

See also

Jurists: deep flaws in legal system
http://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2015/05/judicial-crisis-kings-word-is-law.html

Monday, 23 April 2018

CHIEF JUSTICE UNDER FIRE FROM LAWYERS

The Law Society of Swaziland has criticised the kingdom’s Chief Justice for banning two lawyers from practising.

It says he has no legal right to do this.

The row started when CJ Bheki Maphalala banned two lawyers from appearing in courts because they had allegedly not passed on monies due to their clients. He said he could do this under sections 139 (5)| and 142 of the Constitution.

The Law Society of Swaziland disputed this and said it was the body to deal with the matter through its disciplinary tribunal.

Now, the Times of Swaziland reports that the CJ is threatening to close down 70 law firms in the kingdom where King Mswati III rules as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch. The newspaper reported on Monday (23 April 2018) he had given firms 21 days to submit audited trust certificates that demonstrate financial worthiness. About 70 firms have failed to do this, the Times reported.

Swaziland has a long history of disputes with the Chief Justice. In February 2016, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) reported King Mswati III’s absolute monarchy in Swaziland ‘ultimately is incompatible with a society based on the rule of law.’

The report, Justice Locked Out: Swaziland’s Rule of Law Crisis, called on Swaziland’s Constitution to be amended to bring it in line ‘with regional and universal international law and standards, in particular on the separation of powers and respect for judicial independence.’

An international mission investigated Swaziland following the attempted arrest and the impeachment of former Chief Justice Michael Ramodibedi and the arrest of the Minister of Justice Sibusiso Shongwe, two High Court judges Mpendulo Simelane and Jacobus Annandale and High Court Registrar Fikile Nhlabatsi in April 2015. 

The report stated the judicial crisis was ‘part of a worrying trend of repeated interference by the Executive and of the Judiciary’s inability to defend its independence, exacerbated by apparent strife within the ruling authorities of Swaziland. 

  
‘Swaziland’s Constitution, while providing for judicial independence in principle, does not contain the necessary safeguards to guarantee it. Overall, the legislative and regulatory framework falls short of international law and standards, including African regional standards.’

It added, ‘The mission found that some members of the Judiciary have exercised their mandate with a lack of integrity and professionalism. In particular, former Chief Justice Ramodibedi failed to protect and defend the institutional independence of the Judiciary, and played a reprehensible role in undermining both the institutional independence of the Judiciary and that of individual judges in Swaziland. 

‘He also presided over, or was involved in the case allocation of, legal proceedings in which he had a personal interest or in which he acted at the apparent behest of members of the Executive, further undermining the independence and impartiality of the Judiciary.  

‘Based upon its independent research, including its consultations with various stakeholders, the fact-finding mission determined that this latest crisis has served to expose already existing divisions within and between the Judiciary and the Executive.  The consequence has been an abuse of the justice system to settle political scores, further damaging the independence of the Judiciary in the process.  

‘Overall, the events that triggered the international fact-finding mission are both a reflection of a systemic crisis and potentially a contributing factor to its deepening further. In light of its findings, this report includes the fact-finding mission’s recommendations for reform to the Crown, Executive and Legislature, the Judiciary, the legal profession, the international community and civil society, which it considers will strengthen the rule of law, respect for human rights and access to justice and effective remedies in the Kingdom of Swaziland.’

See also

JURISTS: DEEP FLAWS IN LEGAL SYSTEM
SWAZI JUDICIAL CRISIS: KING’S WORD IS LAW
http://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2015/05/judicial-crisis-kings-word-is-law.html

Tuesday, 5 August 2014

LAW SOCIETY TAKES ON TOP JUDGES

The Law Society of Swaziland is taking on the kingdom’s judiciary, arguing that King Mswati III has appointed judges in violation of the constitution.

An attempt to challenge the appointment as a High Court Judge of Mpendulo Simelane failed on Friday (1 August 2014) when a case at the High Court was dismissed before the Law Society’s lawyers arrived at the court.

The Law Society argues that Simelane is too inexperienced to be a High Court Judge. It says the constitution states that a High Court Judge must have at least 10 years’ experience in legal practice. The Law Society says Simelane only has five years’ experience, which the judge disputes.

In Swaziland, King Mswati rules as an absolute monarch and he chooses the judges. Critics say that Swazi judges tend to do the bidding of the King, rather than uphold the constitution.

The King reappointed Michael Ramodibedi as Chief Justice in contravention of the constitution that states the holder of this position should be a Swazi. Ramodibedi comes from Lesotho.

The three judges on the High Court bench in the Simelane case were themselves inexperienced. The chair, Judge Abande Dlamini, sits in the Industrial Court and had been sworn in as an acting High Court Judge only the day before.

The other two judges on the bench, Justices Mbuso Simelane and Bongani Dlamini are also only acting judges.

Together they dismissed the Law Society’s case and awarded punitive damages against the organisation when at 9.30am the case was called three times and the Law Society failed to answer. The Law Society’s legal team arrived at the court 15 minutes later.

The Law Society is to appeal the decision. Meanwhile, it is also to challenge the appointment of Judge Abande Dlamini, because, as with Simelane, Dlamini has not been a legal practitioner for at least 10 years.

It also says that Justices Mbuso Simelane and Bongani Dlamini should not hear a case brought by the Law Society because they are themselves members of that organisation.

Judge Mpendulo Simelane was criticised by the United States, the European Union and many human right organisations across the world last month when he sentenced a magazine editor Bheki Makhubu and human rights lawyer Thulani Maseko to two years imprisonment after they wrote and published articles critical of the judiciary in general and Chief Justice Michael Ramodibedi in particular.

Following the dismissal of the Law Society’s application, the Swazi Observer, a newspaper in effect owned by King Mswati III, reported that permanent High Court judges were available to hear the case and it was not necessary to have acting judges on the bench.

It speculated that Chief Justice Ramodibedi did not trust some of the permanent High Court judges. 

The newspaper reported that in May 2014 Ramodibedi issued warrants for the arrest of three High Court judges, but had to withdraw them after Supreme Court judges threatened to resign if the arrests went ahead.

The newspaper reported, ‘The move to sideline the judges is consistent too with the CJ’s recent interview in one of the tabloid weekly publications that some judges were being used to overthrow the Monarch and he would not allow them whilst he was still in charge.

‘This recent move by the CJ is a vote of no confidence to the rest of the judges of the High Court to listen to such an application,’ the newspaper reported.

See also

OSISA ON SWAZI JUDICIAL CRISIS

Friday, 21 March 2014

CALLS TO RELEASE JAILED CRITICS GROW

More organisations within Swaziland and internationally have joined the chorus of support for the two ‘prisoners of conscience’ who have been jailed on remand accused of contempt of court for criticising the judiciary in magazine articles.

Human rights lawyer Thulani Maseko and Bheki Makhubu, editor of the Nation magazine, were sentenced to seven days in jail ahead of a court hearing scheduled for 25 March 2014.

They are accused of contempt of court for criticising judges, including the Swazi Chief Justice Michael Ramodibedi, for the way they handled a court case involving Government Chief Vehicle Inspector Bhantshana Gwebu.

It was CJ Ramodibedi himself who jailed the two men, described by Amnesty International as ‘prisoners of conscience’. No hearing was heard in open court and Maseko and Makhubu were denied proper legal representation.

The US Embassy in Swaziland said it had ‘deep concern’ about the arrest of the two men and added it strongly supported the democratic principles of freedom of speech, freedom of expression and freedom of the press. 

The Law Society of Swaziland said Makhubu and Maseko were irregularly arrested and detained on the instruction of the chief justice. It also criticised the summary manner in which the two were dealt with subsequent to their arrest.

In a statement it said, ‘It is the view of the Law Society that every citizen of Swaziland is entitled to the due process of the law which entails the right to legal representation, equality before the law, right to appear in a open court before an impartial judicial officer, a right to a fair hearing, a right to administrative justice and a right to personal liberty, including the right to bail as provided in terms of the provisions enshrined in the Constitution of Swaziland and the founding principles of natural justice.’

Members of a number of progressive organisations attended court last week to support the two men, described by Ditshwanelo, The Botswana Centre for Human Rights, as ‘two human rights defenders’. These included the Swaziland Association of Teachers (SNAT), the Trade Union Congress of Swaziland (TUCOSWA), the Swaziland Coalition of Concerned Civic Organisations (SCCCO), the Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA), the Coordinating Assembly of Non-Governmental Organisations (CANGO) and Lawyers for Human Rights Swaziland (LHRS).

Meanwhile, the international organisation Reporters Without Borders (RWB) said, ‘The arbitrary arrests of Maseko and Makhubu are the latest examples of the persecution that awaits anyone voicing the least criticism of Swaziland’s institutions.’

Lucie Morillon, head of research and advocacy at RWB, said, ‘In a country where the only voices tolerated are those of King Mswati and his government, how much leeway do journalists have to cover and comment on local news developments? None.’

Morillon added, ‘The detention orders that the chief justice himself issued, without any respect for Swaziland’s legal standards, are blatant violations of freedom of expression, motivated by a desire for personal revenge. We call on the authorities to free these two men at once.’

Freedom House also called for the immediate release of Makhubu and Maseko. It said, ‘The Kingdom of Swaziland must uphold the basic rights and freedoms of its citizens and put an end to its sustained campaign to suppress its citizens’ basic right to freedom of expression.’

It added, ‘These arrests, indictments and imprisonment constitute a direct violation of the Swaziland constitution’s section 21, which guarantees a fair trial and the section 24, the right to freedom of expression.’

The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) Africa Program Coordinator Sue Valentine said in a statement, ‘These arrests make a mockery of Swaziland’s constitution, which is supposed to uphold freedom of expression.’

The International Commission for Jurists (ICJ) said that both men appear to be detained for exercising their right of freedom of expression’.

Also calling for the release of the accused are the SADC Lawyers Association, the Southern Africa Litigation Centre and the Law Society of South Africa (LSSA).

See also

AMNESTY ATTACKS SWAZI JUSTICE
SUPPORT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS