Search This Blog

Showing posts with label oil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oil. Show all posts

Friday, 29 May 2026

Swaziland Newsletter No. 928 – 29 May 2026

 

Swaziland Newsletter No. 928 – 29 May 2026

News from and about Swaziland, compiled by Global Aktion, Denmark (www.globalaktion.dk) in collaboration with Swazi Media Commentary (www.swazimedia.blogspot.com), and sent to all with an interest in Swaziland - free of charge. The newsletter and past editions are also available online on the Swazi Media Commentary blogsite.

 

eSwatini’s oil reserve gamble

By Edwin Naidu, Mail & Guardian (South Africa), 27 May 2026

SOURCE 

Eswatini has signed a $300 million agreement with Taiwan to build a massive strategic oil reserve but the project is raising difficult questions in a country battling deepening poverty, soaring unemployment and allegations of elite enrichment

Eswatini is a country standing at a crossroads — and increasingly, at the edge of a cliff. The latest World Bank data paints a stark picture: one in three citizens is unemployed and nearly half the population lives in poverty, surviving on less than $3 (about R50) a day. 

Youth unemployment hovers near catastrophic levels and the economy, though showing flickers of growth, remains too small, too fragile and too undiversified to absorb the thousands of young people entering the labour market each year.

Against this bleak backdrop, under the absolute leadership of King Mswati III since 1986, eSwatini government officials have signed a $300 million (12 billion Emalangeni) financing agreement with Taiwan for the construction of the Phuzumoya Strategic Oil Reserve — a project pitched as a cornerstone of national energy security. 

The deal, formalised in Taipei, commits eSwatini to a 36-month build of an 80 million litre fuel reserve, split evenly between petrol and diesel. It is the largest infrastructure financing agreement eSwatini has entered in years.

But the question that hangs over the announcement is unavoidable: Can a country battling deepening poverty and chronic unemployment afford such a project and can it afford not to? 

The project has become further mired in controversy amid allegations about the beneficiaries of the agreement. According to allegations circulating among activists and political insiders, the project could financially benefit members of the royal family and politically connected figures. The government denies the claims. 

After a controversial visit to eSwatini by Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te earlier this month, the Taiwanese agreed to increase the transfer of interests to the nation. 

Ambassador Liang Hong-sheng was reportedly instructed to inform the royal family that once the storage facility was built, the income would belong to the king and royal family. 

Members of the royal family, including the king and Natural Resources Minister Prince William Dlamini, will allegedly receive a pro rata share of the $300m investment. 

Liang will also allegedly receive $2.5m, to be administered by a Taiwanese businessman in eSwatini, with other officials and “green interest” groups set to benefit.

The king’s spokesperson, Percy Simelane, however, denied any wrongdoing, saying a feasibility study was conducted before the Phuzumoya Oil Reserve project received the green light.

To read more of this report, click here

https://mg.co.za/africa/2026-05-27-eswatinis-oil-reserve-gamble/

 

Still no trace of missing E67m elderly grants

By Ntombi Mhlongo, Times of eSwatini, 28 May 2026

SOURCE 

LOBAMBA: Sixteen years after millions meant for elderly grants could not be traced, the Deputy Prime Minister’s (DPM) Office has admitted that it has failed to recover the money and has since referred the matter to the Losses Committee.

The issue resurfaced yesterday during the appearance of the office before the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), where officials were responding to audit queries raised by Auditor General (AG), Timothy Matsebula.

According to the Auditor General’s Financial Audit Report for the year ended March 31, 2024, the Department of Social Welfare still has unretired cash advances amounting to E67 671 963.88 dating back to the 2010 financial year.

Matsebula said the money had originally been issued to government officials as imprests for the payment of elderly grants in constituencies when beneficiaries were still receiving grants in cash.

However, the cash advances were never retired against the wages advance suspense account as required under government financial regulations.

The auditor general stated that in the 2010 financial year alone, E26 941 081.70 remained unretired and the amount continued accumulating over the years to the current E67.6 million, with no recoveries made from the public officers responsible for the funds.

Matsebula advised the controlling officer to investigate the matter, hold the officers involved accountable and ensure the retirement of the cash advances.

He also directed that the matter be reported to the Losses Committee and relevant authorities for further investigation.

The controlling officer had previously informed the AG that internal investigations had been conducted, but were unsuccessful because some documents were incomplete while others could no longer be located. Officials who had handled the transactions at the time were reportedly asked to provide reports explaining what transpired, but no meaningful progress was made.

The matter was also reported to the Royal Eswatini Police Service. However, the AG raised concern that supporting evidence showing the progress of police investigations, as well as proof that the matter had been formally submitted to the Losses Committee, had not been provided.

Read more of this report, click here

https://times.co.sz/news/readmore.php?bhsadjgfoh=Still+no+trace+of+missing+E67m+elderly+grants&yiphi=4002&bvhdgsj=News

 

MOFA still assessing recruitment of eSwatini workers

ICRT (Taiwan), 27 May 2026

SOURCE 

The [Taiwan] Ministry of Foreign Affairs says government is still assessing the possible recruitment of workers from Eswatini.

According to the ministry’s Department of West Asian and African Affairs, a feasibility study on labor cooperation between the two countries was still in its early stages.

The statements come amid renewed speculation the Lai administration is seeking to source workers from Eswatini.

The foreign ministry has recently dismissed online rumors that the government has already agreed to recruit 1,000 workers from Eswatini annually following President Lai Ching-te’s trip to the kingdom earlier this month.

The ministry has insisted that such online reports are “a classic case of disinformation” with “no basis in fact.”

The 1,000-worker figure also appeared in a 2025 report published by the Eswatini Observer.

Meanwhile, the foreign ministry says it is currently focusing on upgrading vocational training in Eswatini and working with the Ministry of Labor’s Workforce Development Agency to help strengthen workforce training in the Southern African country.

 

King Mswati’s R10billion budget prioritized by Ministry of Finance ahead of SACU receipts, Government suppliers might be paid in September 2026 after civil servants outstanding salary review payments

By Zweli Martin Dlamini, Swaziland News, 26 May 2026

SOURCE 

MBABANE: King Mswati’s R10billion budget as reflected in the National Budget remains a top priority for the Eswatini Government and according to a Ministry of Finance payment plan leaked to this publication, the King through his King’s Office, will receive a larger amount shortly after the country receives payment from the Southern African Customs Union (SACU).

The King and his royal family consume about forty percent (40%) of the National Budget in a country where about 70% of the population lives below the poverty line and as a result, the country is facing a health crisis and, Government is struggling to timely pay suppliers resulting to private companies struggling to pay salaries as the Government financial challenges manifest into a National cash flow crisis.

But the tiny Kingdom ruled by an absolute Monarch recently faced shortage of passports and other Identity Documents (IDs) amid rampant looting allegedly by a royal syndicate, linked to King’s sister Home Affairs Minister Princess Lindiwe.

Acting Eswatini Government Spokesperson Thabile Mdluli declined to comment when reached by this Swaziland News on Tuesday morning.

On another note, the Government 2026/27 payment plan further suggests that, civil servants will receive their outstanding eighty-five percent (85%) salary increment in July 2026, the Eswatini Revenue Service (ERS) and SACU are highly expected to fund the budget items.

 

King Mswati II


50% of UN funds returned due to poor implementation

By Nomalungelo Phiri, eSwatini Observer, 25 May 2026

SOURCE 

Minister of Economic Planning and Development Dr Tambo Gina has raised concern over Eswatini’s inability to fully utilise funding received from the United Nations (UN), revealing that in some cases up to 50% of allocated resources are returned due to implementation challenges.

Speaking during the Joint National Steering Committee meeting held at the UN House on Thursday, Gina said the situation was worrying, especially at a time when the country continues to face poverty and unemployment.

“In some cases, at least 50% of the resources we receive go back because of lack of implementation. With all the problems we face, including poverty, it is a shame to have resources returned simply due to delays in implementation,” said Gina.

The minister commended development partners, including ambassadors and international stakeholders, for their continued support to Eswatini’s development agenda.

“It is very impressive to see our European partners and high-level ambassadors continuing to support the country.

“I strongly appreciate government, the resource group and all their teams for the work they are doing,” he said.

Gina also raised concern about the effectiveness of some collaborating structures involved in development programmes, saying their large size does not always translate into meaningful implementation.

“Sometimes the collaborating groups are very big, but some members only attend meetings. The key issue in many African countries is weak implementation,” he said.

Despite these challenges, he said the UN Cooperative Framework remains aligned with government priorities and development goals.

“This programme is very much aligned with government priorities. There is commitment in terms of aspirations, but we must also show commitment through action,” he said.

He cited early childhood development as an example of an area that is widely recognised but still not fully integrated into national systems.

“We all understand the importance of early childhood learning and its impact on human development, but we must move from aspiration to full implementation,” he said.

Gina reaffirmed government’s commitment to strengthening cooperation with the UN and development partners.

“Government is committed and the UN is equally committed. We will do everything to ensure we also play our part,” he said.

He further urged the UN to maintain its presence in Eswatini, saying government would work hard to ensure continued partnership.

“We will work hard to encourage the UN not to reduce its presence in the country,” he added.

  

SWAZI MEDIA COMMENTARY

Find us:

Blog: https://swazimedia.blogspot.com/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/142383985790674

 

Wednesday, 19 August 2020

Swaziland King’s controversial oil storage project rises from the dead and could cost kingdom E3bn


The projected cost of building an oil facility in Swaziland (eSwatini), enthusiastically supported by the kingdom’s absolute monarch King Mswati III, has risen to more than E3 billion (US$170 million) even though it was reported that the contract to build it had been cancelled by the Swazi Government in 2017.

A strategic oil reserve facility to store about 90 million litres of fuel at Phuzumoya in eastern Swaziland was originally estimated to cost E900 million.

The Sunday edition of the Times of eSwatini reported a private company called Kantey & Templer had originally been contracted to build the facility but was dismissed from the project in October 2017.

Now, the Times said the project was continuing and so far E54.89 million had been spent and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Energy’s estimated costs could eventually reach E3.2 billion. 

The project was controversial from the start when the contract was awarded without going out to tender.

It had the enthusiastic backing of King Mswati who receives 25 percent of all mineral income in Swaziland which he holds ‘in trust for the Swazi nation’. In reality he uses the money to fund a lavish lifestyle. In November 2019 he purchased between 13 and 15 luxury Rolls-Royce cars at an estimated cost of up to US$4 million. He also has two private airplanes, at least 13 palaces and fleets of top-of-the-range cars. At his 50th birthday in 2018 he wore a watch worth US$1.6 million and a suit beaded with diamonds that weighed 6 kg. Days earlier he had taken delivery of his second private jet. This one, an Airbus A340, cost US$13.2 to purchase but with VIP upgrades was estimated to have cost US$30 million.

In February 2018, the Observer on Saturday, a newspaper in effect owned by the King,  reported the Ministry of Natural Resources and Energy was in the process of terminating the contract because little progress had been made.

In October 2013, King Mswati officially launched the construction of the project at a sod cutting ceremony. He said at the time, ‘The project that I bring to you today is one that is geared into transforming lives and take the entire region into higher heights.’

Construction was supposed to take two years and create 300 jobs.

Even though it had already missed its deadline, King Mswati, during the official opening of parliament in 2016, encouraged investors to take advantage of the project.

Once completed the facility would have a capacity for 90 million litres of fuel, enough to last Swaziland 90 days. No independent analysis had been undertaken to see if this was needed in the kingdom.

In January 2015 media were excluded from a House of Assembly session where a special Act of Parliament was passed to allow the Government to make the payment for the project. 

Members of parliament had previously rejected a Bill to guarantee the payment.

Claims of malpractice circulated in the kingdom and members of parliament were concerned that the lucrative contract had not put out to open tender. Media in Swaziland also reported that some people had registered imposter companies as part of a plan to destabilise the project.

After a year the project had not started. It emerged that the company originally contracted to build the project American Tank and Vessel (AT&V) had withdrawn from the contract.

The reason for the withdrawal of AT&V has not been explained publicly, but it is believed that the move was permitted under the terms of the company’s contract.

Then, without public consultation or going through the legal open tendering process, the contract was awarded to South African Company, Kantey & Templer Consulting Engineers.

The Swazi Observer reported the Natural Resources and Energy Minister Jabulile Mshwama saying that ‘since His Majesty had already announced that work had to begin by cutting the sod, her ministry had been working round the clock that the project kick starts and according to Swazi custom once the King has spoken, things have to be done’.

When a Government Bill was first introduced to the House of Assembly, members of parliament threw it out. The Times of Swaziland, the only independent daily newspaper in the kingdom, reported, ‘The MPs had tossed out the Bill after concerns had been raised about why the tender for the construction of the about E900m facility had not been an open one and they also questioned the particulars of Kantey & Templer Proprietary Limited (Swaziland) [a company formed to oversee the project].’

The Times Sunday, an independent newspaper, reported, ‘MPs are unhappy that other companies were not engaged, through an open tendering system, to bid for the multimillion project.  Suspicion reached high levels when the MPs learnt that a closed tendering system was used to engage the South African company to embark on the project. The nature of the suspicions cannot be repeated for now.’

The Sunday Observer, another newspaper in effect owned by the King, reported that individuals were trying to destabilise the project. It reported, ‘Two prominent individuals identified as being behind the hijack include a present cabinet minister and a businessman who also happens to be a former cabinet minister.’ 

The newspaper reported, ‘An individual close to the project confided that there is serious lobbying, by those who want a stake in the project, to have it stalled.  “The very same people who wanted to register impostor companies are the ones who are now lobbying members of parliament and cabinet ministers to have the project grounded. They are doing this to serve their own selfish interests. They want to create bad publicity around Kantey & Templer and the project in the hope that the tender award would be cancelled,” the well-informed individual said.’ 

Senators also questioned the awarding of the tender. The Observer on Sunday reported, ‘Senator Chief Kusa had also strongly questioned why the initial company AT&V had suddenly withdrew from the project and questioned how the whole project was costed and how the tendered company Kantey & Templer was eventually awarded tender. 

‘Senator Chief Kekela also wondered if the credibility of the company was considered as the country has experienced a number of projects that have failed as a result of companies whose profiles and credibility was not considered. “We have seen companies that have come and made heavenly promises that have however not come to effect and failed and I must say I do not want to work on risks here as a risk is dangerous, we should not therefore risk with the Swazi people,” the Senator said.’

In February 2018, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Energy told the Observer on Saturday, ‘The contractor [Kantey & Templer] did not meet the agreed upon timelines and we are working within the framework of the agreement for the next steps in this project. It is envisaged that the project will be returned to tendering in the very near future.’

See also

Swazi King fell for US$5bn con-trick

Thursday, 15 February 2018

US$90-M SWAZILAND OIL PROJECT SINKS

A E900 million (US$90 million) oil contract that was awarded without being tendered has been cancelled by the Swaziland Government after more than four years.
 
Kantey & Templer had been contracted to build a ‘Strategic Oil Reserve’ at Phuzumoya in the Lubombo region. It was to store up to 170 million litres of fuel. 

The project had the enthusiastic backing of King Mswati III who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch. The King receives 25 percent of all mineral income on Swaziland which he holds ‘in trust for the Swazi nation’. In reality he uses the money to fund a lavish lifestyle that includes at least 13 palaces, fleets of top-of-the-range BMW and Mercedes cars and a private jet. He is due to take delivery of a second jet during 2018.

The Ministry of Natural Resources and Energy is in the process of terminating the contract, the Observer on Saturday newspaper reported (10 February 2018). It said little progress had been made. 

In October 2013, King Mswati officially launched the construction of the project at a sod cutting ceremony. He said at the time, ‘The project that I bring to you today is one that is geared into transforming lives and take the entire region into higher heights.’

Construction was supposed to take two years and create 300 jobs.

Even though it had already missed its deadline, King Mswati, during the official opening of parliament in 2016, encouraged investors to take advantage of the project.

The project was surrounded in controversy. Once completed the facility would have a 90 million litres fuel capacity to last Swaziland 90 days. It would store 42 million litres of diesel and 38 million litres of petrol. No independent analysis had been undertaken to see if this was needed in Swaziland.

In January 2015, Swazi Media Commentary reported that media had been excluded from a House of Assembly session where a special Act of Parliament was passed to allow the Government to make the payment for the project. 

Members of parliament had previously rejected a Bill to guarantee the payment.

Claims of malpractice circulated in the kingdom and members of parliament were concerned that the lucrative contract had not put out to open tender. Media in Swaziland also reported that some people had registered imposter companies as part of a plan to destabilise the project.

After a year the project had not started. It emerged that the company originally contracted to build the project American Tank and Vessel (AT&V) had withdrawn from the contract.

The reason for the withdrawal of AT&V has not been explained publicly, but it is believed that the move was permitted under the terms of the company’s contract.

Then, without public consultation or going through the legal open tendering process, the contract was awarded to South African Company, Kantey & Templer Consulting Engineers.

The Swazi Observer, a newspaper in effect owned by King Mswati, reported the Natural Resources and Energy Minister Jabulile Mshwama saying that ‘since His Majesty had already announced that work had to begin by cutting the sod, her ministry had been working round the clock that the project kick starts and according to Swazi custom once the King has spoken, things have to be done.’

She said that Kantey & Templer Consulting Engineers had previously erected fuel reserve tanks at the King Mswati III International Airport. 

When a Government Bill was first introduced to the House of Assembly, members of parliament threw it out. The Times of Swaziland, the only independent daily newspaper in the kingdom, reported, ‘The MPs had tossed out the Bill after concerns had been raised about why the tender for the construction of the about E900m facility had not been an open one and they also questioned the particulars of Kantey & Templer Proprietary Limited (Swaziland) [a company formed to oversee the project]. 

‘The MPs had said all government ministries were expected to adhere to the provisions of the Procurement Act without first resorting to the single provision in the same Act even when the requirements of same are not met by the project at hand as it was in this present case.’ 

The Times Sunday, an independent newspaper, reported, ‘MPs are unhappy that other companies were not engaged, through an open tendering system, to bid for the multimillion project.  Suspicion reached high levels when the MPs learnt that a closed tendering system was used to engage the South African company to embark on the project. The nature of the suspicions cannot be repeated for now.’

The Sunday Observer, another newspaper in effect owned by the King, reported that individuals were trying to destabilise the project. It reported, ‘Two prominent individuals identified as being behind the hijack include a present cabinet minister and a businessman who also happens to be a former cabinet minister.’ 

The newspaper reported, ‘An individual close to the project confided that there is serious lobbying, by those who want a stake in the project, to have it stalled.  “The very same people who wanted to register impostor companies are the ones who are now lobbying members of parliament and cabinet ministers to have the project grounded. They are doing this to serve their own selfish interests. They want to create bad publicity around Kantey & Templer and the project in the hope that the tender award would be cancelled,” the well-informed individual said.’ 

Senators also questioned the awarding of the tender. The Observer on Sunday reported, ‘Senator Chief Kusa had also strongly questioned why the initial company AT&V had suddenly withdrew from the project and questioned how the whole project was costed and how the tendered company Kantey & Templer was eventually awarded tender. 

‘Senator Chief Kekela also wondered if the credibility of the company was considered as the country has experienced a number of projects that have failed as a result of companies whose profiles and credibility was not considered. “We have seen companies that have come and made heavenly promises that have however not come to effect and failed and I must say I do not want to work on risks here as a risk is dangerous, we should not therefore risk with the Swazi people,” the Senator said.’

In February 2018, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Energy told the Observer on Saturday, ‘The contractor [Kantey & Templer] did not meet the agreed upon timelines and we are working within the framework of the agreement for the next steps in this project. It is envisaged that the project will be returned to tendering in the very near future.’

See also

SWAZI KING FELL FOR US$5bn CON-TRICK

Tuesday, 6 January 2015

SWAZI KING FELL FOR US$5bn CON-TRICK



The controversy surrounding the Swazi Government’s award of a US$90 million contract to build an oil storage facility without going through the legally-required tender process has rekindled memories of the time King Mswati III fell for a US$5 billion con-trick. 

It involved a contract that was similarly awarded without a public tender process and it raised doubts over the Swazi King’s ability to do business in the international arena.

In 2009, King Mswati, who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch, announced he had secured US$5 billion through ‘donor aid’ to pay for two coal-powered electricity generating stations to be built in the kingdom.

The King deliberately bypassed the Swazi Government (which he personally hand-picked) and the King’s Office negotiated the deal with a firm calling itself Franken Mining. 

Prince Mangaliso-Logcogco, chair of Liqoqo, the group that advises the King, said at the time, ‘We wanted to avoid the delays, bickering and disagreements that characterise many government projects.’
The Times of Swaziland quoted the Prince saying the rights to coal reserves in Swaziland had been allocated to Franken Mining.
The Times of Swaziland quoted Prince Mangaliso-Logcogco saying that to avoid delays in seeing the project actually taking off, government had not been involved. He said government would only be brought on board once all important aspects had been covered. 

Prince Mangaliso-Logcogco said, ‘Land and minerals are under the control of the King.’ He said, ‘That is the level at which this matter is being handled.’ 

The NGO, the Swaziland Coalition of Concerned Civic Organisations (SCCCO), was quick to raise concerns about the project. In a statement it said the project, ‘has the potential to destabilise the country, ruin the environment, destroy communities and set back the cause of poverty reduction by many years if not forever.’

Prince Mangaliso-Logcogco, in an interview with the Times Sunday newspaper, called the SCCCO ‘Judas’ and launched a bitter personal attack on SCCCO chair Bishop Mabuza and the whole Anglican Church. 

The sums involved in the power station deal were vast: US$5 billion was roughly the equivalent of Swaziland’s entire gross domestic product at the time. The total amount of imports into Swaziland in 2008 was worth roughly US$2 billion. 

Within hours of the King’s announcement which received wide coverage in Swaziland itself, journalists outside the kingdom smelt a rat when they could find no trace of a company called Franken Mining.

Swazi Media Commentary reported at the time, ‘The deal is shrouded in secrecy. [Swazi Media Commentary] and others have separately been trying to find out more details and have come up against a brick wall. Top of our list of concerns is that none of us can even find a company with the name Franken Mining. Nor is it clear which international donor agencies have contributed the funding or what process was gone through before awarding the contract to Franken.’ 

‘We are right to be suspicious since Swaziland has a long track record of corruption and financial incompetence. It is estimated by the Swazi Government itself that E40 million (US4 million) is lost to corruption in Swaziland each and every month.’

It took more than 18 months before Prince Mangaliso-Logcogco admitted the King and Liqoqo had been conned by criminals who wanted to use Swaziland to launder money.

In an interview in the Times Sunday in December 2010, he said the main intention for the unnamed donors to finance the projects in Swaziland was to gain tax relief for their respective companies and associations. 

They were to apply to the US and some governments affiliated to the European Union (EU) for their companies to be granted tax relief because of their involvement in humanitarian activities in developing countries across the globe.

‘We discovered that they were a syndicate hell-bent on money laundering tactics when we checked their genuineness. I can confirm that the projects we announced last year will not take off. We can’t deal with those people who wanted to help us because their financial activities are not so clean,’ Prince Mangaliso-Logcogco told the newspaper.

He did not explain why the King ever thought Franken was legitimate, since there was no trace of their company anywhere and the amount of money it claimed to have to invest was so huge – about five times the size of Swaziland’s annual budget. 

In December 2014, in controversial circumstances, the Swazi House of Assembly passed an Act of Parliament to pay a legitimate South African company called Kantey and Templer Consulting Engineers nearly US$90 million to build oil storage facilities at Phuzumoya, in the Lubombo region.

The contract had not been put out to open tender and a number of Swazi parliamentarians questioned the manner in which the deal was done. 

One Senator, Chief Kekela, said Swaziland had experienced a number of projects that have failed as a result of companies whose profiles and credibility was not considered. ‘We have seen companies that have come and made heavenly promises that have however not come to effect and failed and I must say I do not want to work on risks here as a risk is dangerous, we should not therefore risk with the Swazi people,’ the Senator said.

See also

$5bn SWAZI POWER PLANT WAS A CON

GOVT UNDER FIRE IN US$90m OIL DEAL