Stiffkitten blog
September 9, 2012
Reports: Swazis
starve because of corrupt, undemocratic and inefficient regime
The Swazi government is largely to blame for the economic
recession and subsequent increasing amount of Swazis who have to skip meals due
to the financial mismanagement of the Swazi government, according to recent
reports from the World Economic Forum, United Nations and the Institute for
Security Studies.
The reports list low growth levels, government
wastefulness and corruption, and lack of democracy and accountability as some
of the main reasons for the economic downturn that has led to as increasing
amount of starving Swazis.
According to the new Global Competitiveness Report by the World Economic Forum,
Swaziland is one of the least competitive countries in the world – ranked 135th
out of the 144 measured. The main reasons for this, says the report, are
inefficient government bureaucracy and corruption.
The Global Competitiveness Report more specifically names
wasteful government spending, lack of savings and budgetary balance, lack of
government transparency, and health related issues such as tuberculosis, Aids
and a low life expectancy as areas where Swaziland rank poorly compared to the
other 143 countries in the survey.
The Swazi government’s claims that it is suffering due to
the Global Economic Crisis is contested by another recent report, the United
Nations Rapid Assessment of the Fiscal Crisis in Swaziland.
Instead, the report claims that “weak governance and especially the lack of
sound public financial management” are “key factors behind these developments.”
“Even prior to the fiscal crisis,” says the report, “Swaziland was among the
least growing countries in Sub-Saharan Africa.”
The effect of the economic downturn, says the report, is
amongst other things lack of food in one out of four of the surveyed
households. “Some households were eating less than three meals a day, skipping
for the entire day.” 63 per cent of the population live in poverty, 29 per cent
in food poverty, says the report, making “Swaziland akin to a low income
country.”
Finally, the Institute for Security Studies’ Situation Report on Swaziland says that the present Swazi Tinkundla election system, that amongst other things outlaws political parties and lets the king select the cabinet and many of the parliamentarians, “reproduces the prevailing political status quo in Swaziland” and results “in a parliament which does not have power.”
Finally, the Institute for Security Studies’ Situation Report on Swaziland says that the present Swazi Tinkundla election system, that amongst other things outlaws political parties and lets the king select the cabinet and many of the parliamentarians, “reproduces the prevailing political status quo in Swaziland” and results “in a parliament which does not have power.”
Swaziland is one of only three African countries that do
not have multiparty constitutions.
The report also quotes a democratic movement that sees the “tinkhundla system as being the bedrock of the Swazi system of autocratic governance devoid of accountability; as a tool for entrenching economic mismanagement and corruption, poverty and inequalities.”
The report also quotes a democratic movement that sees the “tinkhundla system as being the bedrock of the Swazi system of autocratic governance devoid of accountability; as a tool for entrenching economic mismanagement and corruption, poverty and inequalities.”
No comments:
Post a Comment