Democrats in Swaziland are calling on SADC to press King Mswati
III to allow democracy in his kingdom.
The call comes in a new report – the latest in a long
line – on the lack of human rights in Swaziland.
AfriMAP, a group that monitors and promotes compliance by African states with the requirements of good governance, democracy, human rights and the rule of law, in a report recently published, said the kingdom is ‘an island of autocratic rule’ in the SADC [Southern African Development Community] region.
AfriMAP, a group that monitors and promotes compliance by African states with the requirements of good governance, democracy, human rights and the rule of law, in a report recently published, said the kingdom is ‘an island of autocratic rule’ in the SADC [Southern African Development Community] region.
King Mswati rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africa’s last
absolute monarch. Political parties are banned and campaigners for democracy
are labelled ‘terrorists’ by the king and his supporters.
Swaziland is set to hold parliamentary elections in
September 2013.
Ozias Tungwara, director of AfriMAP, said in a statement launching the report, ‘The current form
of governance in Swaziland is a complete anathema to the conventional wisdom
that prevails in almost all AU [African Union] member states, and certainly in
SADC; the issue of dictatorships, absolutism and total state control of the
citizenry is a forgotten and unacceptable notion; which is why Swaziland
government must realize that it cannot delay political reforms, since it will
only undermine its credibility, delay progress, economic and social development
of the very people it is supposed to uplift and protect.’
The AfriMAP report, which has the support of civil
society groups in the kingdom, concluded that Swaziland does not have minimum
polling and democratic standards, because the right of assembly and the
formation of political parties are forbidden. The report says that the
political system in the country is ‘chronically deficient, and without any
democratic culture or values of good governance’.
The AfriMAP report is the latest in a string of reports
critical of Swaziland’s human right record.
A report published earlier this year by the US State
Department revealed, ‘The three main human rights abuses [in 2012] were police
use of excessive force, including use of torture, beatings, and unlawful
killings; restrictions on freedoms of association, assembly, and speech; and
discrimination and abuse of women and children.
‘Other human rights problems included arbitrary arrests
and lengthy pretrial detention; arbitrary interference with privacy and home;
prohibitions on political activity and harassment of political activists;
trafficking in persons; societal discrimination against members of the lesbian,
gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community and persons with albinism;
harassment of labor leaders; child labor; mob violence; and restrictions on
worker rights.
‘In general perpetrators acted with impunity, and the
government took few or no steps to prosecute or punish officials who committed
abuses.’
In May 2013, in its annual report on Swaziland, Amnesty International reported, rights to freedom of expression, association and
peaceful assembly continued to be violated in the kingdom. There were also
‘arbitrary arrests and excessive force used to crush political protests,’ the
report stated, and ‘torture and other ill-treatment remained a persistent
concern’ in Swaziland.
Amnesty noted that in May 2012 the African Commission on Human
Rights adopted a resolution ‘expressing alarm’ at the Swazi Government’s
failure to implement previous decisions and recommendations of the Commission
relating to the rights of freedom of expression, association, and assembly.
These violations included the use by police of, ‘rubber
bullets, tear gas and batons to break up demonstrations and gatherings viewed
as illegal’.
In April 2013, the Open Society Initiative for Southern
Africa (OSISA) reported
that recently Swaziland police and state security forces had shown ‘increasingly
violent and abusive behaviour’ that was leading to the ‘militarization’
of the kingdom.
OSISA told the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR) meeting in The Gambia, ‘There are also reliable reports of a general militarization of the country through the deployment of the Swazi army, police and correctional services to clamp down on any peaceful protest action by labour or civil society organisations ahead of the country’s undemocratic elections.’
OSISA told the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR) meeting in The Gambia, ‘There are also reliable reports of a general militarization of the country through the deployment of the Swazi army, police and correctional services to clamp down on any peaceful protest action by labour or civil society organisations ahead of the country’s undemocratic elections.’
In April 2013, the Swaziland United Democratic Front
(SUDF) and the Swaziland Democracy Campaign (SDC), two organiastions campaigning
for democracy in the kingdom, in a joint statement said police in Swaziland
were now a ‘private militia’ with the sole purpose of serving the Royal regime.
This was after about 80 armed officers broke
up a public meeting to discuss the lack of democracy in the kingdom.
See also
KING MSWATI REGIME ‘CATASTROPHIC’
SWAZILAND STILL VIOLATES FREEDOMS
U.S. REBUKES POLICE OVER VIOLENCE
SWAZILAND ‘BECOMING MILITARY STATE’
No comments:
Post a Comment