Royal greed and oppression
sold as culture in Swaziland
Kenworthy
News Media, 3 August 2016
Swaziland’s
king Mswati III passes suppression, unaccountability and royal opulent spending
in the face of drought, starvation and poverty, as traditionally “Swazi”
values. Sonkhe Dube, a young exiled activist, begs to differ, writes Kenworthy News Media.
“The
Swazi system of governance, ‘Tinkhundla’, is indeed unique”, says, Sonkhe Dube,
who is the International Secretary of the Swaziland Youth Congress. “They claim
it is a democratic institution that encompasses traditional form of leadership.
But in a democratic state, the cabinet is not handpicked by a king who
literally controls everything without being accountable to his citizens”.
King
Mswati III has recently spent US$ 14 million on a new personal 375-seater jet
and will be spending millions of dollars more on hosting a SADC Heads of State
summit this year, while a quarter of his population is starving. According to
the World Bank, Swaziland is a lower middle income-country.
Swazi law
and custom
In Africa, many colonial authorities and traditional leaders together recreated the relatively pluralistic and consensus-driven traditional chiefdoms into a source of royal power that could be controlled by indirect rule.
In Africa, many colonial authorities and traditional leaders together recreated the relatively pluralistic and consensus-driven traditional chiefdoms into a source of royal power that could be controlled by indirect rule.
In
Swaziland, king Mswati’s father king Sobhuza II was given the power to appoint
and dismiss chiefs and in 1957, 11 years before independence, acts of
disobedience against the king was made illegal by a colonial act. The foundations
that were laid for such royal hegemony were seen a couple of years after
independence, in 1973, when Sobhuza II banned political parties, declared a
state of emergency that is yet to be officially repealed and began ruling as an
absolute monarch.
Tradition
is also the basis for Swaziland’s constitution (from 2005), where the words
“…in accordance with Swazi law and custom” are used many times. The
constitution also gives the king executive authority in Swaziland and in effect
lets him determine what constitutes “Swazi law and custom”.
Cultural
oppression
Nevertheless, Swazis are made to believe that the monarchy rules through the people by way of a traditional people’s parliament, ‘Sibaya’, say Sonkhe Dube.
Nevertheless, Swazis are made to believe that the monarchy rules through the people by way of a traditional people’s parliament, ‘Sibaya’, say Sonkhe Dube.
“But when
the king called Sibaya in 2012, and the convention pronounced to the king that
they wanted the Prime Minister Sibusiso Dlamini and his cabinet out, the king
responded by keeping them. The same Prime Minister is still in charge, against
the will of the people”.
Ordinary
Swazis are also at the mercy of the king through his chiefs in their everyday
lives. One example of this was in September 2014 in Nokwane, where the houses
of many poor Swazi families were bulldozed to the ground without a warrant and
with only 48 hours’ notice, to make way for a Science Park. Many of them had
lived there for decades and had nowhere else to go.
“Chiefs
allocate land to people and chase them out of their chiefdoms if they feel
there is something wrong with them, as happened in Kamkhweli and Macetjeni,
where the king sanctioned the eviction of families. The king and the chiefs
also order their subjects to do voluntary manual labour in their fields. The
product from the manual labour culturally has to cater for the vulnerable and
orphaned, but currently it is not doing that, yet people are still required to
provide labour for the chiefs and the monarchy. Culturally, the king and chiefs
do not own the land but are supposed to be holding it in trust for the people”,
Sonkhe Dube says.
Greedy
monarchy
No culture remains frozen in time. Culture is, or ought to be, about the adjustment of society to the needs of its citizens, as well as the other way round.
No culture remains frozen in time. Culture is, or ought to be, about the adjustment of society to the needs of its citizens, as well as the other way round.
And
according to Sonkhe Dube, the current Swazi Tinkhundla system of governance is
by no means adjusting itself to the needs and wishes of the people. It is
neither democratic nor even truly traditional in a Swazi sense.
“It is a
system based on the manipulation of culture to satisfy the insatiable appetite
of the greedy monarchy. The monarchy should stop hiding behind culture. Swazi
culture in not only about ceremonies but also about social responsibilities
which the present powers that be are intentionally ignoring”, says Sonkhe Dube.
No comments:
Post a Comment