Search This Blog

Monday, 22 June 2015

KING WINS JET CASE ON A TECHNICALITY

The company that sued King Mswati III of Swaziland for US$3.5 million in unpaid bills relating to his luxury private jet has lost its case on a legal technicality.

But, the Appeal Court in Ontario, Canada, said the issue of the unpaid debt could still be pursued at a different court. 

Air Leasing (SG Air) had sued in the Canadian courts under the Repair and Storage Liens Act. It said it had paid the money for repairs and upgrades to the King’s private jet, a MacDonnell Douglas DC-9 jet (also known as MD87). It had expected the money to be repaid by King Mswati, but this did not happen.

The Appeal Court in Ontario in a judgment dated 17 June 2015 decided that SG Air was not eligible to sue under the Repair and Storage Liens Act because the company was not an aircraft repairer and it did not undertake the repairs to the jet aircraft itself. The court accepted that SG Air might have paid the money for other companies to make upgrades to the jet.

The court said the issue of the unpaid debt was not within its jurisdiction and this would have to be pursued elsewhere.

The Appeal Court denied a request from King Mswati’s lawyers to release a US$3.5 million letter of credit the Swazi Government was forced to deliver in order to get the jet released from the custody of the court in May 2015.

The letter will still be held in trust in a bank in case SG Air decides to appeal the decision to the Canadian Supreme Court.

SG Air has not yet said if it will appeal the decision.

This should bring to a conclusion a story that began in May 2010 when, in the depths of Swaziland’s worst financial crisis in its history, King Mswati III secretly bought himself a private jet for US$11.45 million.

He then committed himself to paying another US$6 million over five months for luxury modifications.

While this was happening the Swazi Government, which he handpicked, was slashing department budgets and public services by E1.5 billion (US$150 million) in an attempt to keep the kingdom out of bankruptcy. Seven in ten Swazis continue to live in abject poverty with incomes of less than US$2 per day.

In December 2010, unable or unwilling to pay his debts, the King sold the plane to Millers Capital, a Singapore-based investment company, for US$7.5 million – US$3.95 million less than he paid for it five months earlier. In April 2012, he bought the plane back from Millers for US$9.5 million – US$2 million more than he had sold it. He then claimed to the Swazi people that the plane had been donated to him by development partners.

Papers presented to an Ontario court on 9 April 2015 revealed that on 20 May 2010, SG Air, a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, sold the jet to Inchatsavane, a company whose sole shareholder was King Mswati, for US$11.45 million. The sale was for the shell aircraft and engines and did not include the interior.

There was an additional agreement between Inchatsavane and Goderich Aircraft Inc (GAI) of Ontario, Canada, to modify the interior of the aircraft for a price of US$6 million, which was to be paid by the King’s company in instalments between 7 June 2010 and 8 November 2010.

In November 2010 GAI said that Inchatsavane was in arrears of payments by about US$2.6 million.

A close business associate of King Mswati introduced him to Millers Capital to assist Inchatsavane to obtain financing to pay off the debt.

On 30 December 2010, Millers Capital bought the aircraft from Inchatsavane for US$7.5 million, of which US$3 million went to GAI to pay off the arrears and US$4.5 million went to the King through his company Inchatsavane.

The court papers alleged that there was a verbal agreement between Millers Capital and Inchatsavane that the King would be allowed to repurchase the plane at a later date for US$9.5 million.

While the King was making this secret deal to secure the future of his private luxury jet, the Swazi economy was in free-fall. The mismanagement of the Swazi economy was so grave that in August 2010 both the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank refused to support Swaziland’s attempt to raise a US$500 million loan from the African Development Bank.

In August 2011, GAI said it was insolvent and could not complete the upgrading of the aircraft. SG Air agreed to fund the continuing upgrading on the understanding that the King’s company Inchatsavane would repurchase the aircraft from Millers Capital for US$9.5 million.

The court papers stated that if Inchatsavane did not buy back the plane, SG Air had an understanding with Millers Capital that the aircraft would be sold and SG Air would recover its expenses from that sale.
As of 17 April 2012, the costs paid by SG Air on behalf of Inchatsavane for the modifications to the jet totalled US$3.275 million. 

SG Air paid a further US$1.37 million in connection with repairs and improvements to the plane. This took the total amount payable to more than US$4.6 million.

The upgrades were all to increase the luxuriousness of the jet and had nothing to do with ensuring the King’s security. The court papers stated the jet had nothing in it ‘making it unique or necessary for HMK [His Majesty the King] to conduct any state / sovereign business’.

The papers added the aircraft had, ‘no missile detection  system, no military radar, no ammunition resistant steel, no in-flight refuelling connection, nor does it have any advanced avionics and defences or electronic counter measures to interfere with enemy radar. 

‘Practically speaking, the aircraft is an “ordinary” airplane retrofitted with luxury amenities.’

The King through his company Inchatsavane repurchased the jet on 18 April 2012 for US$9.5 million from Millers capital, through Wells Fargo in its capacity as trustee. This was in line with the verbal agreement they had made in December 2010.

The government which is hand-picked by King Mswati, who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch, made several public statements in April 2012 to say the jet had been donated to the King as a gift by ‘development partners’.

This was the first public announcement made about the plane, although it had originally been purchased nearly two years earlier in May 2010.

The King’s Prime Minister Barnabas Dlamini, said on government-controlled radio that the King had been given the jet as a birthday gift, ‘from development partners and friends of the King, to be used by their majesties for travels abroad’.

Government spokesperson Percy Simelane said at the time, ‘The donor has asked to remain anonymous and we stand by that agreement.  We don’t owe anybody an apology for having been lucky to have someone purchase a jet for the King.’ 

In April 2015, the court papers stated that although Inchatsavane had not remitted the outstanding monies owed, SG Air did not press for payment ‘aggressively’. But, by November 2014, more than two-and-a-half-years after the plane’s repurchase, SG Air told the King it was ‘imperative’ that it be repaid.

To facilitate a speedy resolution, SG Air agreed with King Mswati that US$3.5 million should be paid to SG Air as ‘full and final’ settlement of the costs in connection with the aircraft. By making this offer, SG Air wrote off US$1.1 million of the debt.

By 16 December 2014, the debt had not been paid and SG Air succeeded in obtaining an attachment of the plane for unpaid debts of the aircraft which was in Goderich, Ontario, for routine maintenance. The plane was eventually released after the Swazi Government delivered a letter of credit for US$3.5 million which is being held in trust in a bank until the court case is concluded. This guarantees the King will be able to pay the debt if the court orders him to.

See also

SWAZI KING NOT ABOVE LAW IN CANADA
SWAZI KING IS ABOVE THE LAW, COURT TOLD
WHO PAID FOR SWAZI KING’S JET
REVEALED: COST OF FLYING KING’S JET
SWAZI MPs CONFUSED OVER KING’S JET
REVEALED: DETAILS OF KING’S NEW JET
KING'S COMPANY AT CENTRE OF JET ROW
SWAZI KING ‘REFUSED TO PAY JET DEBT’
SWAZI KING’S JET HELD FOR UNPAID DEBTS
‘SWAZI KING TO BUY US$44m PRIVATE JET’
http://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2015/04/swazi-king-to-buy-44m-private-jet.html

Saturday, 20 June 2015

SACKED CHIEF JUSTICE LEAVES KINGDOM

Michael Ramodibedi, who was sacked as Chief Justice by Swaziland’s autocratic King Mswati III on Wednesday has left the kingdom. It is thought he is returning to his home country of Lesotho after he has received medical attention in South Africa.

The quick departure brings to an end speculation that he might face criminal charges in the courts. In April, a warrant was issued for Ramodibedi’s arrest on 23 charges relating to alleged abuse of power. Later, the warrant was suspended and Ramodibedi faced a hearing by the Judicial Service Commission (JSC).

Ramodibedi left his government house in the Swazi capital Mbabane on Friday (19 June 2015) and left Swaziland through the Ngwenya border post into South Africa. Local media reported that he was driven away by his son Napo and escorted to the border post by police.

The JSC heard evidence against Ramodibedi on 9 June 2015. Ramodibedi was not present at the hearing, citing illness. No defence against the allegations was given.

Ramodibedi faced three charges. They were:

1. Abuse of office – In the allocation of the Swaziland Revenue Authority (SRA) matter which was heard to hear a case brought by Ramodibedi  against the SRA for taxing his gratuity to the amount of E128 000 (US$12,800).

2. Abuse of office – In the hearing of the Impunzi Wholesalers (PTY) Ltd v The Swaziland Revenue Authority, in which it is alleged wealthy businessmen offered judges E2 million to help them win their case against the SRA involving the importation of goods into the kingdom.

3. Abuse of office in order to achieve an ulterior motive – In the hearing of the Estate Policy matter, where it is alleged Ramodibedi appointed three acting High Court judges to hear the case when their terms of office had expired.

Following the hearing, the JSC reported to King Mswati, who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch. The King appoints the government and top judges. Political parties are barred from taking part in elections and all groups advocating for democracy are banned under the Suppression of Terrorism Act.

The King then made the decision to sack his Chief Justice.

See also

SWAZI CHIEF JUSTICE’S HISTORY OF ABUSE
SWAZI KING SACKS CHIEF JUSTICE
ARREST WARRANT FOR CHIEF JUSTICE

Friday, 19 June 2015

SWAZI CHIEF JUSTICE’S HISTORY OF ABUSE

Swaziland’s Chief Justice Michael Ramodibedi who has been sacked by King Mswati III had a long history of abusing his power in office.

But, despite widespread criticisms from across the world, Ramodibedi was allowed to remain in power.

His dismissal for ‘serious misbehaviour’, will come as a shock to the man himself and as a puzzle to many observers of Swaziland because until now he had the support of the autocratic King. In return Ramodibedi gave unswerving loyalty to the King who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch.

The King appointed Ramodibedi, who is from Lesotho, as acting Chief Justice in 2010.

On 16 June 2011, Ramodibedi issued a directive that ensured the King would be above the law in his own kingdom.

Under s11 of the Swaziland Constitution the King was already immune from any suit or legal process ‘in any cause in respect of all things done or omitted to be done by him’. This was further reinforced by Ramodibedi’s explicit practice directive stated that immunity applied for any claims made indirectly against the King. 

The King was clearly satisfied with Ramodibedi’s conduct and in 2012 he appointed him the substantive Chief Justice for an indefinite period. This was done in contravention of the Swazi Constitution, which states that the Chief Justice must be a Swazi.

In Swaziland, the King chooses government ministers and top judges. Political parties are banned from taking part in elections and all groups opposing him are banned under the Suppression of Terrorism Act.

Ramodibedi had been in the spotlight for a number of years over the way he ran the Swazi judiciary on behalf of the King. 

Many allegations of abuse of power have been made from lawyers within Swaziland and also by the international human rights community. 

In May 2014, two Supreme Court judges reportedly threatened to resign if a warrant issued by Ramodibedi for the arrest of three High Court judges who were critical of him was served, Ramodibedi reportedly issued the warrants but the Swazi police did not make the arrests. 

The three judges were Mumcy Dlamini, Bheki Maphalala and Mbutfo Mamba.

Reportedly, arrest warrants were issued because the CJ felt the judges were ‘ignoring his orders and bringing the High Court into disrepute’.

It was reported at the time that should the warrants be effected and the judges arrested, the CJ planned to appoint interim judges himself.

This was not an isolated incident of abuse of power. In a report on Swaziland covering the year 2011, Human Rights Watch stated, ‘Serious deficiencies in Swaziland’s judicial system persist. In an ominous precedent for the independence of the judiciary, Chief Justice Michael Ramodibedi in August suspended Justice Thomas Masuku for insubordination and for insulting the king, among other charges.’

It added, ‘On August 11 [2011] Justice Masuku appeared before the Judicial Service Commission (JSC), whose six members are appointed by the king. On September 27 [2011] the king relieved Judge Masuku of his duties for “serious misbehavior.” Justice Masuku had in the past made several rulings in favor of human rights.’

In the case of Masuku, Ramodibedi acted as judge, prosecutor and witness in the case he himself brought.

David Matse, the Swaziland Minister for Justice, was fired from his job because he refused to sign the dismissal letter for Masuku. 

Human Rights Watch added, ‘Control over the daily allocation of cases for hearings, including urgent ones, has been placed solely in the hands of the chief justice, creating what is perceived by lawyers as an unacceptable bias in the administration of justice. In August [2011] the Law Society of Swaziland instituted a boycott of the courts to protest these developments and the failure of the authorities to hear its complaints regarding the running of the courts, including the chief justice’s allocation of cases. On September 21[2011], Law Society members delivered a petition to the minister of justice calling for action to address the decisions of the chief justice and the general administration of justice in the court system.’

In August 2011, Swazi police in bullet-proof vests and armed with shotguns and tear gas canisters invaded a meeting of lawyers in the Swaziland High Court, which had been called to discuss their on-going campaign to get Ramodibedi removed from office. Reports in the Swazi media said the Chief Justice himself ordered the police to break up the meeting.

In September 2011, the Centre For Human Rights, Swaziland, reported, ‘Swaziland lawyers embarked on the court boycott after the CJ issued a series of unlawful practice directives, to all courts of the land, directing them not to admit certain cases. In one directive, the CJ instructed the Registrar that cases would only be allocated to judges by the CJ himself, and no other officer. In another practice directive, issued in June 2011, the CJ instructed the Registrar and officers of all courts in the land that cases involving the king should not be admitted. These regrettable actions of the CJ were largely viewed as interference not only with the administration of the courts, but also as a denial of the fundamental right to access justice.’

In November 2011, the Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa (OSISA) reported, ‘Lawyers have been boycotting the courts for almost four months in protest at the maladministration of justice in the country by the incumbent Chief Justice, Michael Ramodibedi. But this week, they upped the pressure on the Chief Justice by staging a mass walk-out of the Supreme Court. This left all suspects and people with civil cases with no legal representation.

‘But astonishingly, the Chief Justice ordered that all cases be heard with or without the lawyers. This, as some have already observed, is the height of injustice. The Chief Justice is also on record as praising people who represented themselves saying that they actually argue “much better than the lawyers”.

‘Subsequent to the directive to proceed without the lawyers, Ramodibedi then went another step further - banning all lawyers from setting foot in the High Court. A heavily armed police contingent has been posted in and around the High Court premises and only government lawyers and people with cases have been allowed to enter. Banned from meeting at the High Court, the lawyers opted for a very innovative strategy, using their vehicles to “march” through the capital city in protest and brining the city to a stand-still - much to the consternation of the police.’

Ramodibedi was sacked on 17 June 2015 by the King after a Judicial Service Commission hearing into allegations of abuse of office.

The JSC heard evidence against Ramodibedi on 9 June 2015. Ramodibedi was not present at the hearing, citing illness. No defence against the allegations was given.

Ramodibedi faced three charges. They were:

1. Abuse of office – In the allocation of the Swaziland Revenue Authority (SRA) matter which was heard to hear a case brought by Ramodibedi  against the SRA for taxing his gratuity to the amount of E128 000 (US$12,800).

2. Abuse of office – In the hearing of the Impunzi Wholesalers (PTY) Ltd v The Swaziland Revenue Authority, in which it is alleged wealthy businessmen offered judges E2 million to help them win their case against the SRA involving the importation of goods into the kingdom.

3. Abuse of office in order to achieve an ulterior motive – In the hearing of the Estate Policy matter, where it is alleged Ramodibedi appointed three acting High Court judges to hear the case when their terms of office had expired.

Following the hearing, the JSC reported to King Mswati who then made the decision to sack his Chief Justice.

See also

SWAZI KING SACKS CHIEF JUSTICE
CJ AND JAILED JOURNALISTS
‘CJ ARREST WARRANTS FOR CRITIC JUDGES’
DOES CHIEF JUSTICE KNOW THE LAW?
JUDICIARY BID TO STOP MEDIA SCRUTINY
TOP JUDGE ATTACKS PRESS FREEDOM
CHIEF JUSTICE THREATENS MEDIA
SWAZI JUDGE FIRED FOR ‘DISRESPECT’
AMNESTY: REINSTATE JUDGE MASUKU
SWAZI LAWYERS MARCH FOR JUDGE
SWAZI KING ABANDONS RULE OF LAW
SWAZI MINISTER OF JUSTICE FIRED
SWAZI KING FIRES CRITICAL JUDGE
AMNESTY ON SWAZI JUDICIAL SYSTEM
SWAZI CHIEF JUSTICE MUST GO – SCCCO
SWAZI LAWYERS CHARGE CHIEF JUSTICE
SWAZI LAWYERS BOYCOTT COURTS
SWAZI CHIEF JUSTICE ‘ABUSES POWERS’

SWAZI KING SACKS CHIEF JUSTICE

King Mswati III of Swaziland has fired his Chief Justice Michael Ramodibedi for ‘serious misbehaviour’.

The King, who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch, signed a legal notice on Wednesday (17 June 2015).

The King, who appoints all government ministers and top judges and who appointed Ramodibedi, cited the Swaziland Constitution in announcing his decision.

The dismissal is with immediate effect. Ramodibedi had been suspended from office pending the outcome of a hearing of the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) into allegations of abuse of office.

The JSC heard evidence against Ramodibedi on 9 June 2015. Ramodibedi was not present at the hearing, citing illness. No defence against the allegations was given.

Ramodibedi faced three charges. They were:

1. Abuse of office – In the allocation of the Swaziland Revenue Authority (SRA) matter which was heard to hear a case brought by Ramodibedi  against the SRA for taxing his gratuity to the amount of E128 000 (US$12,800).

2. Abuse of office – In the hearing of the Impunzi Wholesalers (PTY) Ltd v The Swaziland Revenue Authority, in which it is alleged wealthy businessmen offered judges E2 million to help them win their case against the SRA involving the importation of goods into the kingdom.

3. Abuse of office in order to achieve an ulterior motive – In the hearing of the Estate Policy matter, where it is alleged Ramodibedi appointed three acting High Court judges to hear the case when their terms of office had expired.

Following the hearing, the JSC reported to King Mswati who then made the decision to sack his Chief Justice.


See also

CHIEF JUSTICE CASE HEARD IN HIS ABSENCE
SWAZI CHIEF JUSTICE FIGHTS FOR HIS JOB
JURISTS: DEEP FLAWS IN JUSTICE SYSTEM

Thursday, 18 June 2015

CAMPAIGN TO STOP ‘KING’S CUP’ SPREADS

News of the campaign to stop two top South African football clubs taking part in a tournament to honour King Mswati III of Swaziland is spreading globally.

South African newspapers, wire services and Internet sites across the world are reporting opposition to Kaizer Chiefs and Orlando Pirates taking part in the King’s Super Cup in honour of King Mswati, who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch.

The tournament, to be played this year for the first time, is due to take place on 18 July 2015 at the Somhlolo National Stadium in Lobamba.

In Swaziland political parties are barred from taking part in elections, the King chooses the government and top judges and opposition groups are labelled ‘terrorists’ under the Suppression of Terrorism Act.

Swazi campaigners for democracy said if the two football clubs took part in the tournament it would be a ‘mockery to the many activists that have died at the hands of the government and those who are presently languishing in jail for having dared to talk against the atrocities obtaining in Swaziland’.

The People’s United Democratic Movement (PUDEMO), in a statement that has been reported by news organisations across the world, said, ‘Almost 70 percent of Swazi citizens live under the poverty line of less than a dollar a day, while Mswati III’s preoccupation is buying private jets, luxury cars and touring the world with his throng of wives at the expense of the Swazi people.’

The statement added, ‘PUDEMO implores the two soccer giants to reconsider their decision to be involved in a tournament that seeks to put a human face on a government that has made it its prime occupation to govern the people with fear and dispossession. 

‘The fact that the tournament’s namesake is to honour an individual who uses fear and corruption to accumulate riches which he then uses to further suppress freedoms and curtail human rights, should be an indicator enough that the good game of soccer is being taken to the sewers, and this tournament will forever taint the good name of these two soccer giants for having dared to give credibility to a king who sits executive over cold blooded murder and the incarceration of innocent citizens.’

The Communist Party of Swaziland in a statement said the participation of the two football giants in the tournament undermined the efforts of democrats to isolate the King.

In an open letter to Irvin Khoza, Chairman of Orlando Pirates Football Club and Kaizer Motaung, Executive Director, Kaizer Chiefs Foodball Club, the Swaziland Solidarity Network said, ‘It is clear from the name of the event that this is not just a sporting event meant to promote goodwill but rather a political event meant to legitimise a despot who has lost credibility in the eyes of the world and the country that he rules with an iron fist.’

See also

CALL TO BOYCOTT KING’S SOCCER CUP
http://swazimedia.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/call-to-boycott-kings-soccer-cup.html

Tuesday, 16 June 2015

MPs WANT INQUIRY INTO ‘POLICE KILLING’

Members of Parliament in Swaziland on Monday (15 June 2015) called for an inquiry into the death in police custody of the Mozambique national Luciano Zavale.

He was reportedly suffocated to death while being tortured by police.

Swazi Prime Minister Barnabas Dlamini is expected to make an official statement to parliament on the matter on Wednesday. A further report from the PM is expected in the coming week.

The Mozambican High Commissioner to Swaziland Luis Adelino da Silva has also called for answers from the police on how Zavale, popularly known as Melusi, died.

The People’s United Democratic Movement (PUDEMO), the best known of the banned prodemocracy organisations in Swaziland, condemned the death as ‘cold blooded murder’.

It said in a statement, ‘These arbitrary killings have become commonplace in Swaziland because no action gets taken to bring the guilty to justice.’

See also

‘SWAZI POLICE ADMIT KILLING SUSPECT’
‘POLICE TORTURE SUSPECT TO DEATH’
http://swazimedia.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/police-torture-suspect-to-death.html

NO OVERSIGHT ON SWAZI KING’S SPENDING

There is no oversight on how Swaziland King Mswati III, his fifteen wives and vast royal family spend public money, a United States report has concluded.
 
The US makes annual reviews of the ‘fiscal transparency’ of governments that receive its financial assistance to ensure that American taxpayers’ money is used appropriately.

In its review of Swaziland, published on Friday (12 June 2015), the US Department of State concluded the kingdom, ruled by King Mswati, who is an absolute monarch, did not meet acceptable standards.

The report stated, ‘Expenditures to support the royal family, military, police, and correctional services are included in the budget, but are not subject to the same oversight as the rest of the budget.’

It added, ‘Revenues and expenditures related to natural resources are not included in the budget.’

The report concluded, ‘Fiscal transparency in Swaziland would be improved by including all expenditures and revenues in the budget; subjecting the entire budget to audit and oversight; consistently applying legal procedures in the awarding of natural resource extraction contracts and licenses; and making basic information on natural resource awards publicly available.’

The truth about of the King’s spending has been consistently hidden from the Swazi people, his budget is never debated in parliament, and audits of the budget are only presented to the King himself and the Royal Board of Trustees chaired by the minister of finance.

Media in Swaziland have access to the full budget estimates which contain information about the King’s budget but do not publish it. State media in the kingdom are heavily censored and the private media censors itself when reporting about the King.


Seven in ten of Swaziland’s tiny 1.3 million population live in abject poverty with incomes less than US$2 a day; three in ten are so hungry they are medically diagnosed as malnourished and the kingdom has the highest rate of HIV infection in the world.

Despite the poverty of the kingdom, King Mswati continues to live a lavish lifestyle. He has 13 palaces, fleets of top-of-the-range Mercedes and BMW cars, at least one Rolls Royce and a private jet.

See also

KING DIVERTS WEALTH FROM HIS SUBJECTS
KING MSWATI SPENDS AND SPENDS

Sunday, 14 June 2015

‘SWAZI EX-JUSTICE MINISTER TOOK BRIBE’

Sibusiso Shongwe took a bribe when he was still Swaziland’s Justice Minister and he tried to entice a High Court Judge and the Chief Justice Michael Ramodibedi to also take bribes, a top Swazi judge and a senior judicial officer have testified under oath.

Their evidence was given at the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) hearing into Chief Justice Ramodibedi’s alleged misuse of power

Evidence from suspended High Court Judge Mpendulo Simelane and High Court Registrar Fikile Nhlabatsi was presented to the JSC hearing on Tuesday (9 June 2015). Ramodibedi was charged with three counts of misuse of office. He did not appear at the hearing and his side of the story was not given. 

The case was concluded in his absence. King Mswati III, Swaziland’s absolute monarch, will decide what happens next.

The alleged bribery concerned a case involving Impunzi Wholesalers and the Swaziland Revenue Authority (SRA). The SRA demanded Impunzi paid about E10m (US$1 million) duty for goods imported from China. It said Impunzi has been declaring the goods at US$1.50 per item instead of US$14.50 thereby cheating the SRA of millions of Emalangeni. 

According to an account published in the Observer Sunday, a newspaper in effect owned by King Mswati III, ‘Suspended Judge Mpendulo Simelane has revealed how Shongwe summoned him to his home early in the morning, where he told him of wealthy businessmen operating Impunzi Wholesalers who were willing to pay out E2m [US$200,000] if they were helped to win the case against SRA.

‘Mpendulo said the ex-minster promised him a cut of E200,000 if he agreed to preside over the matter and that the chief justice would get a share of E500,000 while Shongwe would keep the remaining E1.3m.

‘The judge said he refused to be part of the scheme, citing religious convictions and legal ethics as his reasons.

‘“I told him that I do not accept bribes and that this borders on corruption. He further told me that he had discussed the matter with the Chief Justice and that he should allocate the case to me. I refused the offer and left his house and proceeded to work,” said Simelane in his affidavit submitted to the Judicial Service Commission.’

The newspaper added, ‘Moments later, Simelane was called by Ramodibedi who told him he had been allocated the Impunzi case but he claims to have politely turned the CJ down by citing a congested diary. The case was eventually allocated to Principal Judge Stanley Maphalala – something that did not go down well with the former minister, who feared that the judge would not give the ruling he desired.’

The newspaper reported Swazi High Court Registrar Nhlabatsi said she was summoned to Shongwe’s law firm offices at Eveni, where he found him with two Chinese nationals and they were talking about the Impunzi case.

The newspaper reported, ‘She said she was ordered to ask the judge to finalise the matter pronto but when the judge issued his ruling, it was in favour of SRA – as feared by Shongwe.

‘The matter then went to appeal and that is where the scales were swayed to favour Impunzi.

‘First, Simelane was illegally sworn in as acting judge of the Supreme Court so as to preside over the matter together with Ramodibedi and current acting CJ Bheki Maphalala.

‘The first hearing of the matter was postponed and when it returned, Simelane had been replaced with Judge Jacobus Annandale.

‘Ramodibedi, who the minister said stood to benefit E500 000 if Impunzi won, was now part of those to decide the matter.

‘Indeed, Impunzi won the case and it later emerged that E2 million had been deposited into a trust account of Shongwe’s law firm and he was the sole signatory of the account. The money was deposited into the trust account on December 17 and 19, 2014 in two separate amounts of E1 million cash. 

‘The dates show that the first deposit was made a day before the matter was due to be heard by the High Court, where Shongwe and Ramodibedi intended for Simelane to preside over it.

‘When the E2m was uncovered by the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC), which then sought an arrest warrant for Shongwe, Ramodibedi blocked every attempt to have the ex-minister arrested.

‘He said “an arrest cannot be done against His Majesty’s sitting minister without proper clearance”, and ordered that no other judge should deal with the matter without his authorisation.

‘It was also claimed that the money belonged to clients of Shongwe’ law firm, but it later emerged that he had used part of it to settle personal financial obligations such as paying for household furniture.

‘Seeing the net hovering above him, Shongwe tried to pay an amount of E900,000, from the E2m, to the SRA, allegedly on behalf of Impunzi but the SRA was advised by the ACC not to dare touch that money because it was under investigation.

‘Despite the CJ’s efforts, Shongwe was eventually arrested and is currently languishing in prison facing two counts; one of refusing to divulge information to the ACC about money deposited into his law firm’s account and also the theft of a file at the High Court. He was charged with contravening the Corruption Act.’

See also

CHIEF JUSTICE RUNS TO SUPREME COURT
CHIEF JUSTICE CASE HEARD IN HIS ABSENCE
SWAZI CHIEF JUSTICE FIGHTS FOR HIS JOB