Search This Blog

Friday, 17 January 2014

TRUE FACE OF INJUSTICE IN SWAZILAND

Kenworthy News Media, January 16, 2014
Often the true extent of poverty and injustice is hidden behind the euphemism of impassive figures and statistics. Such a generalized picture can easily be misleading and desensitizing, however, if it is not qualified by concrete and personal accounts that reveal the true and emotive extent of poverty and injustice in the world, writes Kenworthy News Media.

The story of a young man, Thembinkosi Ngcamphalala, whom I met briefly in rural Swaziland last October is such an account. A bright and spirited young man who had done well in school and had a promising future, who suffered a cruel and ultimately fatal injustice at the hands of a repressive and inhumane regime.

Thembinkosi was unfortunate enough to have lived in a village right next to one of Swaziland’s national parks, where game rangers can shoot supposed poachers with impunity according to Swaziland’s Game Act – an act that Amnesty International says condones “unlawful killings” and “brutality towards suspect poachers”.

He was shot in the face by such a ranger outside the national park – according to his family he had not been poaching. The shot blasted his one eyeball and severely damaged the other, leaving him blind.

On Sunday, he died from these wounds, as his single-parent mother (whose husband had tragically died years earlier) and family were too poor to be able to afford proper treatment for him. The ranger has not been charged and there are several other examples of similar cases in Swaziland.

Thembinkosi’s family is, understandably, shocked, angry and distraught by his death. They are struggling to pay for the funeral service and bidding him farewell in a dignified manner at a time when their minds should be on their tragic loss.

This story shows only too clearly the despair and grief that lie behind the figures and general statements about poverty in countries such as Swaziland. It also reveals that Swaziland is a brutal absolute monarchy that keeps its national parks, with its zebras and lions in pristine condition, allows its game rangers to shoot and kill the poor neighbours of the parks with impunity, and totally disregards the plight of the two-thirds of the population who are virtually starving.

But Thembinkosi should have the last word here. Because after he had been shot he urged his family to still believe in him and that he felt stronger and more focused now that he was blind. He wanted to continue with his life instead of being confined to his bed, feeling sorry for himself. He himself wanted to fight, and kept urging others to fight, for what he referred to as the downtrodden and the oppressed in Swaziland.

The funeral of Thembinkosi Ngcamphalala is on Saturday morning [18th of January] after a night vigil. The night vigil will be preceded by a memorial service Friday [17th of January] at 2 pm at Sgcaweni High School.

Monday, 13 January 2014

MORE MEDIA SELF-CENSORSHIP OVER KING



Once again Swaziland’s Times Sunday has censored itself and misled its readers about international criticism of King Mswati III.

It misreported a CNN report about US President Barack Obama’s criticism of Swaziland and its king, who rules the kingdom as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch. Obama was speaking at the tribute to the life of Nelson Mandela.

The Times was reporting a commentary written by Frida Ghitis and published online by CNN, the international cable news channel.

The Times, which is part of the only newspaper group in Swaziland that is not controlled by the King, reported that Ghitis said Freedom House, an international human rights organisation, described Swaziland as a ‘failed state’.

But, that is not what Ghitis actually wrote. She said Freedom House called Swaziland a ‘failed feudal state’, which is something quite different. By deliberately changing the sense of the statement, the Times deflected the criticism away from the King.

The newspaper also did not report that Ghitis also referred in her article to ‘dictators and their right-hand men’ who were present at the tribute to Mandela.

Ghitis wrote, but the Times did not report,  ‘It included the likes of Swaziland Prime Minister [Barnabas] Sibusiso Dlamini, representing the small kingdom described by Freedom House as “a failed feudal state,” where the king uses photos of beautiful girls to attract tourists, “distracting outsiders from Swaziland's shocking realities of oppression, abject poverty, hunger and disease.”

‘Freedom House says that in the past 40 years, “two despots have used Swaziland for their personal purposes while ignoring the needs of the Swazi people and their legitimate rights to have a say over how they are governed and how the country's resources are used” -- the very antithesis of Mandela’s struggle.’

This is not the first time the Times Sunday has deliberately distorted the news to mislead its readers about criticism of King Mswati.

In 2012, it distorted a story about UK Prime Minister David Cameron and freedom and democracy in the kingdom, to deflect criticism away from the King.

The newspaper carried a report saying that Cameron had responded to a petition from the Swazi Vigil, a prodemocracy group in the UK. 

According to the Times Sunday, the petition read in part, ‘Exiled Swazis and supporters urge you to put pressure on (the Swazi Government) to allow political freedom, freedom of the press, rule of law, respect for women and affordable AIDS drugs in Swaziland.’

The newspaper inserted the words ‘the Swazi Government’ into the petition to make it seem that it was Prime Minister Barnabas Dlamini and his cabinet that was being criticised.

In fact, the petition sent to Cameron in May 2012 actually read, ‘Petition to the British Government: Exiled Swazis and supporters urge you to put pressure on absolute monarch King Mswati III to allow political freedom, freedom of the press, rule of law, respect for women and affordable AIDs drugs in Swaziland.’ 

The Swazi Vigil made it very clear that it was criticising ‘absolute monarch King Mswati III’.

The Times Sunday and other media in Swaziland constantly mislead their readers and audiences about how King Mswati is viewed outside his kingdom. In May 2012 there was widespread criticism against King Mswati’s invitation to join a lunch in London to mark the Diamond Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II’s reign.

There were street demonstrations in London against the King and prodemocracy campaigners drew attention to the lack of freedoms in Swaziland and the lavish lifestyle the king enjoys, while seven in ten of his subjects languish in absolute poverty, earning less than US$2 a day.

Inkhosikati LaMbikiza, one of the King’s 13 wives who accompanied him to the lunch, wore shoes costing £995 (US$1,559), the equivalent of more than three years’ income for 70 percent of Swazi people. The total cost of the King’s trip was estimated to be at least US$794,500. 

The Times, the companion paper to the Times Sunday, reported at the time that Inkhosikati LaMbikiza had ‘rave reviews’ from the Daily Mail newspaper in London for her dress sense, but omitted to say the same newspaper also reported, ‘Guests from controversial regimes include Swaziland’s King Mswati III, who has been accused of living an obscenely lavish lifestyle while many of his people starve.’ 

There was similar criticism a year earlier in April 2011 when King Mswati went to the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton. The Times newspaper in South Africa reported at the time, ‘The controversial absolute monarch, whose country is ranked among the poorest in the world, spent much of this week playing hide-and-seek with prodemocracy demonstrators tailing him across London.’ The King was forced to change his hotel to avoid pickets.

The Swazi media failed to report any of this, but did say that King Mswati had been welcomed by business people in the UK.

See also

PAPER DISTORTS STORY TO PROTECT KING

GOD IS LIKE KING MSWATI: GOVT MINISTER

Swaziland’s Minister of Justice and Constitutional Affairs Sibusiso Shongwe said God operates in the same way as King Mswati III – ‘in a monarchical way’.

He also said King Mswati III, who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch, was chosen by God.

‘It is God’s desire to see the people of Swaziland loving their monarchy. This is because God himself operates in a monarchical way,’ he told officers during a tour of the correctional facility’s criminal mental health centre and the correctional college in Matsapha on Friday (10 January 2014).  

‘The reason God’s eye is closer to the Kingdom of Swaziland is that we are a platform of showing the world how the Almighty God wants the world to be ruled,’ he said.

Shongwe was not elected to government; like all ministers in Swaziland he was appointed by the King. The Observer on Saturday, a newspaper in effect owned by the King, reported, ‘He said he was a minister because of the King, hence he would like to represent him everywhere he goes.’

Shongwe asked officers from the correctional service to give themselves to God in order to be able to do their work without a problem, the newspaper reported. He said officers must be born again in order to deal with convicts. He said they must always remember that breaking the law is demonic. 

It is not only Shongwe who believes King Mswati is chosen by God: the King himself thinks the same.

In August 2013 King Mswati said he had received a vision from God in which he was told to change the name of the undemocratic political system of tinkhundla that governs the kingdom to ‘monarchical democracy’.

This was not the first time King Mswati said he had received a vision from God. In 2011, the King said God spoke to him through a TV remote control.

It happened at the Lozitha Palace, near Mbabane. At the time the king told his subjects about his ‘miraculous experience’.

The Times of Swaziland, the kingdom’s only independent daily newspaper, reported in October 2011, ‘His Majesty saw a miracle yesterday when he was preparing a sermon [to preach to a group of evangelical Christians.] The King said a remote control lay at the centre of a coffee table but something mysteriously brought it down.

‘He said there was no person or wind that could have brought it down.  The King said he realised that God was with him.  It was Him who brought the remote control down.’

Reverend Jonas Dlamini, one of the king’s preachers, said, ‘The king preached to us. He was filled with the light of the Lord when he told us that God had given him a sign when he was getting ready to meet us.  He said a TV remote on his table dropped to the floor with no one touching it and that is how he knew God was communicating with him.’

It is common for apologists of King Mswati who controls a kingdom where political parties are banned and seven in ten of his 1.3 million subjects live in abject poverty, while he has 13 palaces and a fortune once estimated by Forbes Magazine to be US$200 million, to say he is chosen by God. The Swazi Observer newspaper, a stablemate of the Observer on Saturday, in October 2009 told its readers in an article written by the then editor-in-chief Musa Ndlangamandla: King Mswati III is ‘ordained by God to lead his people’.

See also

KING BELIEVES HE IS CHOSEN BY GOD
http://swazimedia.blogspot.com/2013/09/king-believes-he-is-chosen-by-god.html

Friday, 10 January 2014

HUNGER IS FAULT OF GOVERNMENT



King Mswati III of Swaziland incorrectly told his subjects that ‘hard work and prayer’ would stop hunger in the kingdom.

In a speech when dispersing regiments at the end of the Incwala ceremony, the King ‘noted that not every Swazi enjoyed a good livelihood but this could be overcome through hard work and prayer’, the Sunday Observer, a newspaper in effect owned by the King reported.

He said, ‘There should be no poverty in the country but every person’s prayers and wishes should come to fruition’.

‘As you go back to your respective homes, go and plough the land so that we can have a bumper harvest. Because we want to achieve first world status, we need to first have plenty of food.’

The Observer reported. ‘The king’s speech when dispersing the regiments is his first in the New Year and normally sets the tone for the country and gives the direction in which the nation needs to drive towards.’

The King’s call for prayer to overcome hunger is at odds with the evidence that shows government policies are largely to blame for the food crisis in Swaziland. King Mswati, as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch, handpicks the Prime Minister and members of the government. 

Exactly one year ago (January 2013),the Swaziland Vulnerability Assessment Committee in a report predicted a total of 115,712 people (one in ten of the population) in Swaziland would go hungry in 2013 as the kingdom struggled to feed its population as the economy remained in the doldrums.

The report said problems with the Swazi economy were major factors. The kingdom was too dependent on food imports and because of high price inflation in Swaziland people could not afford to buy food. About seven in ten people in Swaziland live in abject poverty, earning less than US$2 a day.

This was not an isolated statement. In 2012, three separate reports from the World Economic Forum, United Nations and the Institute for Security Studies all concluded the Swazi Government was largely to blame for the economic recession and subsequent increasing number of Swazis who had to skip meals.

The reports listed low growth levels, government wastefulness and corruption, and lack of democracy and accountability as some of the main reasons for the economic downturn that led to an increasing number of hungry Swazis.

The Swazi Government was also accused in May 2013 of deliberately withholding food donated from overseas as aid from hungry people as a policy to induce them to become disaffected with their members of parliament and blame them for the political situation in the kingdom. Newspapers in Swaziland and abroad reported the government wanted to punish the kingdom’s MPs for passing a vote of no confidence against it.

It was also revealed that the Swaziland Government had sold maize donated as food aid by Japan for hungry children in the kingdom on the open market and deposited the US$3 million takings in a special bank account. 

A report in July 2013 called The Cost of Hunger in Africa, which was prepared by the government of Swaziland working together with World Food Programme, found that around 270,000 adults in the kingdom, or more than 40 percent of its workers, suffered from stunted growth due to malnutrition. As a result, they were more likely to get sick, do poorly in school, be less productive at work and have shorter lives.

Poverty is so grinding in Swaziland that some people, close to starvation, are forced to eat cow dung in order to fill their stomachs before they can take ARV drugs to treat their HIV status.

In 2011, newspapers in Swaziland reported the case of a woman who was forced to take this drastic action. Once the news went global, apologists for King Mswati denounced the report as lies.

But, a video obtained by Think Africa Press revealed the hardships faced by Sophie Magagula, living in Siteki. In the video Magagula explained that she needed to have food with her anti-retroviral (ARV) drugs, but with food scarce, she was forced to eat anything she could find - including cow dung - to continue her course of medication. The video showed her mixing the cow dung in readiness for eating.

In July 2012, Nkululeko Mbhamali, Member of Parliament for Matsanjeni North, said people in the Swaziland lowveld area had died of hunger at Tikhuba.

In a New Year statement released on Tuesday (7 January 2014) the Prime Minister of Swaziland Barnabas Dlamini supported the King’s words on poverty. He said, ‘In line with the strategy presented by His Majesty, the Administration’s Five Year Programme of Action, that will be presented to Parliament following the Speech from the Throne 2014, will focus on our making more, and growing more, as well as increasing the provision of services such as tourism. And where we identify edible products for export we will aim to add value wherever possible in order to raise the financial return from our entry into the global supply chain.’

See also

GOVT ‘DELIBERATELY STARVING PEOPLE’

CORRUPTION ‘LEADS TO STARVATION’

Wednesday, 8 January 2014

FLIGHTS OF FANCY AT KING’S AIRPORT



Solomon Dube, Director of the Swaziland Civil Aviation Authority (SWACAA), took a flight of fancy this week when he claimed that The Royal Swazi National Airways Corporation (RSNAC) will fly to 10 countries from Sikhuphe Airport, which has yet to be opened.

Dube told local media that RSNAC, which at present has no aircraft and no routes, would fly to nine destinations in Africa and one in Asia.

The Times Sunday newspaper said the airline ‘will fly to destinations such as the United Arab Emirates, Kenya, Ethiopia, Zambia, Rwanda, South Africa, Namibia, Tanzania, Uganda and Botswana among others’.

The newspaper quoted Dube saying the Swazi Government had signed ‘Bilateral Air Service Agreements’ with the destination countries.

The Times reported, ‘Dube said the signing of the accord meant that the Swaziland airline, which also used to be called Lijubantsendzele, will fly to these countries and also the destination countries airlines would also fly into Swaziland.’

But, either Dube is not telling the full truth or the Times has made a blunder. This is because ‘Bilateral Air Service Agreements’ are accords that allow aircraft of one nation to fly over airspace of another: they do not mean that airlines automatically have rights to land at airports and run commercial routes into the country.

Sikhuphe is the airport that for the past 10 years has been under construction in a Swazi wilderness, about 80 km from the kingdom’s capital, Mbabane. Despite claims over the past years that international airlines are keen to fly into Sikhuphe, no agreements have been signed.

No independent study on the need for Sikhuphe Airport was ever undertaken and the main impetus behind its construction has been King Mswati III, who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch. He believes the airport will lend credibility to his dream to make Swaziland a ‘First World’ nation by 2022.

This is not the first time SWACAA has claimed a false success for Sikhuphe. The date for the airport’s opening in 2010 was missed and has been put back a number of times since. In November 2013, SWACAA said the airport was now completed and operational, but no flights have been in or out since.

Also in November 2013, SWACAA confirmed that the Swazi Government was ready to recreate the RSNAC and would set about purchasing a 100-seater jet, at a cost estimated by the Times of Swaziland of E700 million (US$70 million). This compares to the E125 million budgeted for free primary school education in Swaziland this year. It is not clear where the money to buy the aircraft would come from.

If Dube is correct and RSNAC is set to fly to 10 destinations, the airline would probably need a minimum of 10 aircraft to service the routes. For that to happen, assuming that the estimated cost of the aircraft is accurate, Swaziland would have to spend about E7 billion on aircraft. Such a sum of money would bankrupt the kingdom. To put the cost in context earlier this week the Central Bank of Swaziland announced that the kingdom’s Gross Official Reserves were E8.24 billion at the month ended November 2013.

Media reports in Swaziland suggest the cost of Sikhuphe has been about E3 billion so far from an initial budget of E500 million.

As long ago as 2003, the International Monetary Fund said Sikhuphe should not be built because it would divert funds away from much needed projects to fight poverty in Swaziland. About seven in ten of King Mswati’s 1.3 million subjects live in abject poverty, earning less than US$2 per day.

There is no obvious need for the new airport. Major airports already exist less than an hour’s flying time away in South Africa with connecting routes to Swaziland and there is no reason to suspect passengers would want to use the airport at Sikhuphe as an alternative. 

Swaziland’s present airport at Matsapha only carries about 70,000 passengers a year.

See also

PROMISE TO OPEN KING’S AIRPORT BROKEN