The Swazi
Observer newspaper has once again named a rape victim in violation of her
human rights and journalism ethical codes.
It also disclosed her HIV-positive status.
The Sunday
Observer (22 October 2017) reported on a woman it called ‘mentally
unstable’. It named her and published two photographs of her as well as a
picture of where she lived and of her aunt. It also published a photograph of
her youngest daughter. This had her face blanked out but she would be easily
recognisable to people in her community.
The newspaper said the woman had been repeatedly raped
by men in her community and was now HIV-positive.
By publishing the name of the women, the Observer broke Article 15 of the Swaziland
National Association of Journalists (SNAJ) code of ethics on
Survivors of Sexual Assault which states, ‘Journalists shall avoid identifying
survivors of sexual assault or any information that may lead to the
identification of the survivor.’
Journalists across the world generally agree that it violates the rights
of rape victims to publish their names without their consent.
This is not the first time the Swazi
Observer has named alleged rape victims. In
February 2015, it published the names of eight alleged rape victims without
their consent.
The Observer published the
names as part of a report on the start of a trial of an alleged serial rapist.
In its report the Observer listed the
women’s names and details of their attacks in what it called ‘a sneak preview’
of the case. It gave their names and details of how each attack took place. The
newspaper named one woman and revealed she was a virgin.
In all of the attacks violence including a knife was used. In all cases
the alleged rapist did not use a condom.
When the publication of the report caused an outcry the Observer gave a
half-hearted apology, saying it had made a ‘boo-boo’.
In its apology, the Observer
said, ‘Indeed, the only decent thing we could do after mixing up the rules is
to draw our own sword and hang ourselves.’
The editor nor any other journalist involved in the story was
disciplined and the women involved received no compensation. Now, the offence
has been repeated it remains to be seen what action will be taken.
The Swazi Observer newspapers
are in effect owned by King Mswati III who rules Swaziland as sub-Saharan
Africa’s last absolute monarch. Its journalistic credentials have been called
into question many times. In a review
of press freedom in Swaziland, the Media Institute of Southern
Africa (MISA) called the Observer, a
‘pure propaganda machine for the royal family’.
The Observer regularly breaks
Article 1 of the SNAJ code Article 1which deals with people’s right to
information. The article says, ‘The duty of every journalist is to write and
report, adhere to and faithfully defend the truth. A journalist should make
adequate inquiries, do cross-checking of facts in order to provide the public
with unbiased, accurate, balanced and comprehensive information.’
The newspaper is on public
record to say that its ‘collective stand as a newspaper is that the integrity
of Swaziland as a democratic State and His Majesty King Mswati III as the
legitimate leader of the Swazi nation, must never be compromised in any way.’
It also publishes false reports about Asians in Swaziland that are
capable of string up racial hatred. In October 2016, it claimed
that 600,000 people in Swaziland are of Asian origin (14 October 2016). A
website called
countrymeters that constantly updates statistics
recorded Swaziland’s total population at that time as 1,312,881.
That would mean that about 45 percent of the entire Swazi
population were of Asian origin. In fact, every reputable source shows that about
97 percent of Swazi people are African. The sources include the CIA
factbook and indexmundi.
The Observer reported on 14 October 2016 that a parliamentary committee set up to investigate Asians in the kingdom was told Asian people had occupied, ‘every available space in the urban areas’. The newspaper did not name the source of this statement.
The Observer reported on 14 October 2016 that a parliamentary committee set up to investigate Asians in the kingdom was told Asian people had occupied, ‘every available space in the urban areas’. The newspaper did not name the source of this statement.
The Observer
reported as if fact that 90 percent of shops in the kingdom are owned by Asian
people (14 October 2016). It said, in Manzini, the main commercial city in Swaziland,
‘almost the entire city is reportedly in the hands of the Indians’ (14 October
2016).
Other reports it made without giving readers evidence
included: Asian people are rushing to acquire Swazi Nation Land to open up
small businesses (15 October 2016);
wealthy Asian businessmen are evicting Swazis in massive scales in the
areas of Manzini (17 October 2016); Asians are associating themselves with the
Swazi Royal Family because it would secure their investments (17 October
2016).
The constant trashing of Asian people runs against
Swazi journalists’ own code of ethics. It amounts to hate speech. The Swaziland
National Association of Journalists in Article
13 of its code states, ‘Hate speech. (Journalists shall
avoid by all means the publication of speech that might promote hatred, spite
and conflict amongst the Swazi or any other nation.)’
Richard
Rooney
See also
PRESSURE
ON ‘OBSERVER’ OVER RAPE
‘SWAZI
OBSERVER’ NAMES ‘RAPE VICTIMS’
‘OBSERVER’
SHRUGS OFF ITS RAPE OUTRAGE
SWAZI
KING’S PAPER ATTACKS ASIANS
UNREST
AT SWAZI KING’S NEWSPAPER
KING
KEEPS GRIP ON ‘SWAZI OBSERVER’
FALSE
CLAIM OF OBAMA SUPPORT FOR KING
KING’S
PAPER CALLS DEMOCRATS ‘HITLER’
AGOA
PROPAGANDA FROM KING’S PAPER
KING’S
PAPER AND ITS AIRPORT FANTASY
KING
FORCES NEWSPAPER APOLOGY
https://swazimedia.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/king-forces-newspaper-apology.html
No comments:
Post a Comment